Focus on Protecting Your Nest Egg Once You're Retired
How much do you really need to earn on your investments once you retire? Figure it out, and then don't take one more iota of risk than necessary.
If you’re like most investors, you’ve focused on making money for most of your financial life. But once you’re retired or close to retirement, I believe you need to shift gears, to put protection ahead of growth in order to make your savings last.
SEE ALSO: Is 4% Withdrawal Rate Still a Good Retirement Rule of Thumb?
In other words, I suggest you should only take as much risk as is necessary to accomplish your financial goals.
Calculate How Much Return You Really Need
Let's say you’ve done extremely well with your savings and investments over the years. You have $10 million in savings and live on $100,000 a year, so your cost of living is basically 1%. If you earned just 1% on your money, you’d never tap into your nest egg at all. I’d say you’ve won the game, and that you shouldn't risk that win. If you were the coach of a football team that was ahead by 10 points in the fourth quarter, would you tell your players to do anything that could cost you the game? I wouldn’t, and I’d say the same to an investor.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
If you have $10 million and only need a 1% return to support your lifestyle, I believe you should have no stock market risk. At that rate, you could probably put your money in a savings account and make enough to support your lifestyle.
It can be tempting to take a risk, especially when the market is bullish, but let me ask you this: If I could somehow guarantee you that a 2% rate of return would keep you financially secure for the rest of your life, would you take that rate — even if it didn’t beat the S&P? I think most people would take that deal and be really happy that they never had to worry about money again.
That’s why I believe that your retirement income is more important than the percentage return on your money.
What If You’re Not as Well Off?
But what if you only had $100,000 saved and you needed $10,000 a year to support your lifestyle? That would mean you needed a 10% rate of return. Would I advise you to chase a 10% return? No. I’d argue that that there’s no way to get that rate consistently.
Yes, the average annual return for the S&P 500 since its inception is 10%, but once you adjust for inflation, the average drops to around 7%. And there’s a bigger problem: That rate is an average from 1926 through 2018. The rate is nowhere as consistent in smaller increments of time. The average rate of return in 2007 was just 5.48% — and in 2008 it was -36.55%.
And to reiterate the point of this article: If you chase high returns, you are taking high risks. When you were working, you might have been able to cover some of your losses with your salary. But once you’re retired, you’re not just risking your nest egg: You’re risking income that helps to cover your cost of living. You’re running the risk of becoming poor.
See Also: How Can I Estimate the Income I'll Need in Retirement?
Two Options to Address Your Shortfall
Since attempting high returns is too risky, what can you do to make ends meet in retirement if your savings are falling short of your spending needs? Before you consider amping up your stock market risk to make up for the shortfall, first I’d suggest you take a hard look at your expenses instead.
Cost-cutting is difficult for most people. The term implies eliminating something you do—and probably do for enjoyment rather than necessity, or else it wouldn’t be on the table as a cost-cutting option. Instead, I advise people whose lifestyles outstrip their financial capabilities to reduce quantity. For example, I don’t suggest they stop playing golf, but cut back from playing from five days a week to playing three. If they’re eating out three times a week, I suggest they dine out once weekly.
It makes sense: If you want to lose weight, you don't stop eating, you just eat less. This “reduction in quantity” is the same sort of idea. If you manage quantity, the expenses will take care of themselves.
And if cost cutting doesn’t get you far enough? Well, there’s another thing you may need to do: Consider working longer, or, if you’re already retired, go back to work.
A Different Way to Think About Retirement
If you think my version of financial planning for retirement looks more like cash flow analysis than a typical investment plan, you’d be right. My job as a financial adviser is to help my clients’ money last as long as they do. I think that’s your job as an investor, too. And I think the best way to do that is to take only as much risk as you need to support your standard of living.
See Also: Want a Second Passport? Here Are 3 Countries You Can Buy Your Way Into the EU
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Ken Moraif is the CEO and founder of Retirement Planners of America (RPOA), a Dallas-based wealth management and investment firm with over $3.58 billion in assets under management and serving 6,635 households in 48 states (as of Dec. 31, 2023).
-
Stocks Slip to Start Fed Week: Stock Market TodayWhile a rate cut is widely expected this week, uncertainty is building around the Fed's future plans for monetary policy.
-
December Fed Meeting: Live Updates and CommentaryThe December Fed meeting is one of the last key economic events of 2025, with Wall Street closely watching what Chair Powell & Co. will do about interest rates.
-
This Is Why Investors Shouldn't Romanticize BitcoinInvestors should treat bitcoin as the high-risk asset it is. A look at the data indicates a small portfolio allocation for most investors would be the safest.
-
Why Investors Shouldn't Romanticize Bitcoin, From a Financial PlannerInvestors should treat bitcoin as the high-risk asset it is. A look at the data indicates a small portfolio allocation for most investors would be the safest.
-
I'm a Financial Pro Focused on Federal Benefits: These Are the 2 Questions I Answer a LotMany federal employees ask about rolling a TSP into an IRA and parsing options for survivor benefits, both especially critical topics.
-
Private Credit Can Be a Resilient Income Strategy for a Volatile Market: A Guide for Financial AdvisersAdvisers are increasingly turning to private credit such as asset-based and real estate lending for elevated yields and protection backed by tangible assets.
-
5 RMD Mistakes That Could Cost You Big-Time: Even Seasoned Retirees Slip UpThe five biggest RMD mistakes retirees make show that tax-smart retirement planning should start well before you hit the age your first RMD is due.
-
I'm a Wealth Adviser: My 4 Guiding Principles Could Help You Plan for Retirement Whether You Have $10,000 or $10 MillionRegardless of your net worth, you deserve a detailed retirement plan backed by a solid understanding of your finances.
-
A Retirement Triple Play: These 3 Tax Breaks Could Lower Your 2026 BillGood news for older taxpayers: Standard deductions are higher, there's a temporary 'bonus deduction' for older folks, and income thresholds have been raised.
-
If You're Retired or Soon-to-Be Retired, You Won't Want to Miss Out on These 3 OBBB Tax BreaksThe OBBB offers some tax advantages that are particularly beneficial for retirees and near-retirees. But they're available for only a limited time.
-
Waiting for Retirement to Give to Charity? Here Are 3 Reasons to Do It Now, From a Financial PlannerYou could wait until retirement, but making charitable giving part of your financial plan now could be far more beneficial for you and the causes you support.