How much are you paying for financial advice?
Ten to 15 years ago, my experience was that many people were stumped by that question. In fact, many of them didn’t seem to realize they were paying anything at all, although let’s get this straight: Something in exchange for nothing simply doesn’t happen in the world of investments.
Times change, though. In the last five to 10 years, I am finding that many investors I talk to – helped no doubt by the Internet placing so much information at their fingertips – have grown more savvy about the compensation systems for their advisers, who generally are paid either by commission or by fee and, in some instances, a combination of both.
Each method works in a different way.
Financial professionals who are paid based on commission, such as stock brokers or insurance professionals, are paid when a transaction happens, or the commission is built into the financial product. For example, a mutual fund could come with a sales charge or commission. The investor pays the load (commission), which goes to compensate a sales intermediary, such as a broker or financial adviser, for his time and expertise in selecting an appropriate fund for the investor.
The investment products a broker sells have to be suitable to your needs, although they aren’t required to be the least expensive or best option for you. In addition, if you’re changing your investment mix often, you could end up paying more in commissions. In today’s investment world, we tend to make allocation changes based on market conditions and our future outlook.
Now, if you happen to be one of those people who makes an investment and hangs onto it for 30 years, this could work out for you. In that situation, you’ll likely spend less over that long time frame than you would have with a financial professional who is paid by fee for assets under advisement.
I think many of the people who opt to connect with an adviser who charges a fee do so because fee-based or fee-only advisers put the professional on the same side as the client. The fee is based on the value of the client’s investments, or sometimes the client is charged a flat fee. Fee-only advisers don’t make a commission on the purchase or sale of any investment.
Financial professionals charging a fee also usually have a fiduciary responsibility, meaning they are required by law to do what’s in the best interest of a client. By comparison, a commission-based professional is required to do only what’s suitable for the client.
A combination approach
Some professionals work on a combination of the two compensation methods, collecting both fees and commissions. For example, a client may be charged a planning fee and then a commission for insurance and fee for assets under management. Advisers are generally compensated on insurance products via a commission from the insurance company. If the adviser is making financial planning recommendations (such as life insurance), the combination of a commission on the insurance product and a fee for assets under management might be the approach the adviser takes.
One of the advantages I see to the fee side of things is it tends to stretch the role of the professional beyond just recommending a certain stock or fund to buy. There’s financial planning, asset allocation and retirement planning that are incorporated by most fee-based professionals. The client and adviser tend to form a true, lasting relationship over the years.
While a lot of the interactions between adviser and client can take place via phone or email, personally, I like to meet clients face to face. After a while, you get to know them, their kids, and their passions in life and that can help give you a greater perspective about their needs and how your financial advice fits into that.
The bottom line
To sum it all up, there are a lot of pros and cons to the different compensation methods. The best one for you depends on your specific situation (age, risk tolerance, time frame, investment needs, etc.). Our industry has changed dramatically over the last decade and continues to evolve. The fee-based or fee-only adviser has become increasingly popular, and I see this continuing. The fiduciary standard is where the industry is heading as a whole.
Jason Mengel holds a Certified Financial Planner designation, and is a member of the Financial Planning Association. In 2010, he co-founded Fusion Capital, which operates with three locations in South Carolina.
Rozel Swain contributed to this article.
Jason Mengel, originally from Atlanta, Ga., currently resides in Isle of Palms, S.C. He holds a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ designation and is a member of the Financial Planning Association. Mengel graduated from Wofford College in Spartanburg, S.C., with a B.A. in Finance.
5 Midsize Companies to Add to Your Portfolio
Midsize companies promise a long runway for growth, with less volatility than smaller firms. Here are five to consider.
By Kim Clark Published
10 Things to Know About Working in Retirement
Working in retirement could give you more money but also could impact some benefits.
By David Rodeck Published
Health Care Costs in Retirement: Budgeting for a Healthy Future
Many factors affect your health care costs as you age, including where you live, your Medicare selections and whether you have long-term care insurance.
By Brandon Hill Published
The Three Basic Components of a Good Estate Plan
Getting your estate in order so everyone knows what you want when the time comes can save your loved ones confusion and stress.
By Jason “JB” Beckett Published
How to Use Your Estate Plan to Save Tax Now: A Timely Update
Consider an upstream basis trust and a general power of appointment for an older family member to reduce capital gains taxes on highly appreciated assets.
By John M. Goralka Published
Workplace Financial Coaching Has Become Ever More Important
Employees face growing challenges to their financial wellness today, so it’s more critical than ever that employers provide the help they need to navigate them.
By Greg Ward, CFP® Published
Three Reasons Not to Use a Real Estate Agent When You Sell
While this financial adviser doesn’t recommend taking that route, he does see scenarios where it could make sense for you.
By Evan T. Beach, CFP®, AWMA® Published
Soon-to-Be Retirees, Beware: Small-Caps Are Cheap for a Reason
Higher interest rates make debt more expensive for smaller companies, and that could become challenging for them if we head into slower economic times.
By Michael Joseph, CFA Published
The Five Stages of Retirement (and How to Skip Three of Them)
Getting the first step wrong inevitably means you’ll go through stages three through five. Get step one right, and it’s a two-step process.
By Richard P. Himmer, PhD Published
Six Financial Actions to Take the Year Before Retirement
Having your income, health care and tax plans in place before you exit the day job can make it more likely that you'll have a happy retirement.
By Evan T. Beach, CFP®, AWMA® Published