Fee Or Commission: How’s Your Adviser Being Paid And What’s Best For You?
Ask yourself this: Am I a buy-and-hold investor who doesn’t need a lot of hand-holding, or do I need more comprehensive services?
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered daily
Kiplinger Today
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more delivered daily. Smart money moves start here.
Sent five days a week
Kiplinger A Step Ahead
Get practical help to make better financial decisions in your everyday life, from spending to savings on top deals.
Delivered daily
Kiplinger Closing Bell
Get today's biggest financial and investing headlines delivered to your inbox every day the U.S. stock market is open.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Adviser Intel
Financial pros across the country share best practices and fresh tactics to preserve and grow your wealth.
Delivered weekly
Kiplinger Tax Tips
Trim your federal and state tax bills with practical tax-planning and tax-cutting strategies.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Retirement Tips
Your twice-a-week guide to planning and enjoying a financially secure and richly rewarding retirement
Sent bimonthly.
Kiplinger Adviser Angle
Insights for advisers, wealth managers and other financial professionals.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Investing Weekly
Your twice-a-week roundup of promising stocks, funds, companies and industries you should consider, ones you should avoid, and why.
Sent weekly for six weeks
Kiplinger Invest for Retirement
Your step-by-step six-part series on how to invest for retirement, from devising a successful strategy to exactly which investments to choose.
How much are you paying for financial advice?
Ten to 15 years ago, my experience was that many people were stumped by that question. In fact, many of them didn’t seem to realize they were paying anything at all, although let’s get this straight: Something in exchange for nothing simply doesn’t happen in the world of investments.
Times change, though. In the last five to 10 years, I am finding that many investors I talk to – helped no doubt by the Internet placing so much information at their fingertips – have grown more savvy about the compensation systems for their advisers, who generally are paid either by commission or by fee and, in some instances, a combination of both.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Each method works in a different way.
Commission-based compensation
Financial professionals who are paid based on commission, such as stock brokers or insurance professionals, are paid when a transaction happens, or the commission is built into the financial product. For example, a mutual fund could come with a sales charge or commission. The investor pays the load (commission), which goes to compensate a sales intermediary, such as a broker or financial adviser, for his time and expertise in selecting an appropriate fund for the investor.
The investment products a broker sells have to be suitable to your needs, although they aren’t required to be the least expensive or best option for you. In addition, if you’re changing your investment mix often, you could end up paying more in commissions. In today’s investment world, we tend to make allocation changes based on market conditions and our future outlook.
Now, if you happen to be one of those people who makes an investment and hangs onto it for 30 years, this could work out for you. In that situation, you’ll likely spend less over that long time frame than you would have with a financial professional who is paid by fee for assets under advisement.
Fee-based compensation
I think many of the people who opt to connect with an adviser who charges a fee do so because fee-based or fee-only advisers put the professional on the same side as the client. The fee is based on the value of the client’s investments, or sometimes the client is charged a flat fee. Fee-only advisers don’t make a commission on the purchase or sale of any investment.
Financial professionals charging a fee also usually have a fiduciary responsibility, meaning they are required by law to do what’s in the best interest of a client. By comparison, a commission-based professional is required to do only what’s suitable for the client.
A combination approach
Some professionals work on a combination of the two compensation methods, collecting both fees and commissions. For example, a client may be charged a planning fee and then a commission for insurance and fee for assets under management. Advisers are generally compensated on insurance products via a commission from the insurance company. If the adviser is making financial planning recommendations (such as life insurance), the combination of a commission on the insurance product and a fee for assets under management might be the approach the adviser takes.
One of the advantages I see to the fee side of things is it tends to stretch the role of the professional beyond just recommending a certain stock or fund to buy. There’s financial planning, asset allocation and retirement planning that are incorporated by most fee-based professionals. The client and adviser tend to form a true, lasting relationship over the years.
While a lot of the interactions between adviser and client can take place via phone or email, personally, I like to meet clients face to face. After a while, you get to know them, their kids, and their passions in life and that can help give you a greater perspective about their needs and how your financial advice fits into that.
The bottom line
To sum it all up, there are a lot of pros and cons to the different compensation methods. The best one for you depends on your specific situation (age, risk tolerance, time frame, investment needs, etc.). Our industry has changed dramatically over the last decade and continues to evolve. The fee-based or fee-only adviser has become increasingly popular, and I see this continuing. The fiduciary standard is where the industry is heading as a whole.
Jason Mengel holds a Certified Financial Planner designation, and is a member of the Financial Planning Association. In 2010, he co-founded Fusion Capital, which operates with three locations in South Carolina.
Rozel Swain contributed to this article.
-
Over 65? Here's What the New $6K Senior Bonus Deduction Means for Medicare IRMAATax Breaks A new deduction for people over age 65 has some thinking about Medicare premiums and MAGI strategy.
-
U.S. Congress to End Emergency Tax Bill Over $6,000 Senior Deduction and Tip, Overtime Tax Breaks in D.C.Tax Law Here's how taxpayers can amend their already-filed income tax returns amid a potentially looming legal battle on Capitol Hill.
-
5 Investing Rules You Can Steal From MillennialsMillennials are reshaping the investing landscape. See how the tech-savvy generation is approaching capital markets – and the strategies you can take from them.
-
When Estate Plans Don't Include Tax Plans, All Bets Are Off: 2 Financial Advisers Explain WhyEstate plans aren't as effective as they can be if tax plans are considered separately. Here's what you stand to gain when the two strategies are aligned.
-
Counting on Real Estate to Fund Your Retirement? Avoid These 3 Costly MistakesThe keys to successful real estate planning for retirees: Stop thinking of property income as a reliable paycheck, start planning for tax consequences and structure your assets early to maintain flexibility.
-
I'm a Financial Planner: These Small Money Habits Stick (and Now Is the Perfect Time to Adopt Them)February gets a bad rap for being the month when resolutions fade — in fact, it's the perfect time to reset and focus on small changes that actually pay off.
-
Social Security Break-Even Math Is Helpful, But Don't Let It Dictate When You'll FileYour Social Security break-even age tells you how long you'd need to live for delaying to pay off, but shouldn't be the sole basis for deciding when to claim.
-
I'm a Wealth Adviser Obsessed With Mahjong: Here Are 8 Ways It Can Teach Us How to Manage Our MoneyThis increasingly popular Chinese game can teach us not only how to help manage our money but also how important it is to connect with other people.
-
Global Uncertainty Has Investors Running Scared: This Is How Advisers Can Reassure ThemHow can advisers reassure clients nervous about their plans in an increasingly complex and rapidly changing world? This conversational framework provides the key.
-
Should You Jump on the Roth Conversion Bandwagon? A Financial Adviser Weighs InRoth conversions are all the rage, but what works well for one household can cause financial strain for another. This is what you should consider before moving ahead.
-
The 8 Stages of Retirement: An Expert Guide to Confidence, Flexibility and Fulfillment, From a Financial PlannerRetirement planning is less about hitting a "magic number" and more about an intentional journey — from understanding your relationship with money to preparing for your final legacy.
