Federal Employees: Don't Panic About Changes
From a hiring freeze to possibly shrinking retirement and health care benefits, the future holds some uncertainty. However, most of these changes are manageable.


It didn’t take long for President Trump to follow through on his promise to take on government bureaucracy.
On Jan. 23, just three days into his administration, he ordered a hiring freeze for the federal government, halting hiring for all new and existing positions except those in national security, public safety and the military.
Federal employees are no doubt wondering what’s next — and some concern is legitimate. Trump was critical of the federal workforce during his presidential campaign; now that he’s in charge, and with a Republican-led Congress, there could be some more upheaval.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
But it’s time to take a breath. Knee-jerk reactions often lead to bad decisions. And many of the changes proposed so far won’t have much of an effect on current federal employees.
Here’s a look at three issues you’re likely to hear a lot about this year:
A shrinking federal workforce
No agency likes the idea of someone dictating who they can or cannot employ, but the reality is that the government wasn’t exactly hiring at a quick clip before the freeze. Because of budget cuts and sequestration, there have been controls on hiring for several years.
For now, the freeze is limited. It makes a good headline, but day to day, the hiring freeze probably won’t affect the average federal worker (outside of their workload!) very much. And although Trump’s proposed budget, unveiled in March, calls for large cuts in several federal agencies, it can be a lengthy and complex process to lay off federal workers.
Retirement benefits
Members of Congress already have been pushing for changes to federal employees’ retirement benefits. One proposal would have federal employees take on a larger share of contributions into their retirement system.
For federal employees who still have 20-plus years to work, this will make it harder to save more money in the Thrift Savings Plan — so it’s understandably a plan that’s unpopular with federal workers. But ultimately, the pension is a cost-of-living-adjusted benefit that a retiree can’t outlive — something that really doesn’t exist in the private sector. It remains a valuable benefit. And those who are nearing retirement shouldn’t see much impact.
Another idea that has been introduced a few times in the last couple of years is changing the way the return on the Thrift Savings Plan’s Government Securities fund, or G Fund, is calculated.
There have been a lot of estimates as to what this would save the federal government in terms of the interest it pays, because the G Fund has the highest participation rate of any fund within the Thrift Savings Plan. But if that interest rate drops, my guess is most participants would simply move their money to another allocation. The G Fund is attractive because it pays a nice rate of return for a safe investment. Take that away, and it’s not so appealing. And employees have several other options, such as the F Fund for Investment Grade Bonds and the C, S and I Funds for equities.
Health care benefits
Besides their pension, health care coverage is the most expensive benefit federal employees receive. Currently, the Office of Personnel Management is paying to cover about 8.1 million federal employees, retirees, family members and their survivors. The government pays roughly 70% of the premiums, and the employee/retiree pays about 30%. Lawmakers are looking at ways to put more of that cost on the insured.
Today, if the premium on a Blue Cross and Blue Shield policy goes up by $100, the Office of Personnel Management picks up $70 of that, and the federal employee picks up $30. One proposal is to take whatever the Department of Labor says is the cost of living on health care and pay 70% of that, not what the actual premium increase is. It’s projected that over 10 years, the federal employee would be paying roughly 50% of their premiums instead of 30%.
This proposal would result in a dramatic price increase — especially for someone who is already retired and vulnerable to inflation. It warrants watching and, if you’re so inclined, a letter to your representative.
Focus on the big picture
Bottom line: It may feel as though they’re rewriting the rules in the middle of the game, but you still have some control.
Employees who have been with the government for 30 years have seen their benefits under attack before. And they survived it. They still have a pension, and they’ll have a good income in retirement.
But if you aren’t already, it’s time to become more engaged with your benefits. Pay attention to the updates. Talk to a financial professional with some expertise in federal benefits so you understand your options and maximize their value.
And stay calm. The wheels of government move slowly. You’ll have time to react — wisely and without panicking — to the changes that come along.
Kim Franke-Folstad contributed to this article.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Ann Vanderslice, president and CEO of Retirement Planning Strategies, specializes in helping federal employees understand and maximize the value of their benefits and plan for retirement. Vanderslice holds the Registered Financial Consultant designation from the International Association of Registered Financial Consultants. She is the author of "FedTelligence 2.0: The Ultimate Guide to Mastering Your Federal Benefits."
-
13 Answers to Pressing Social Security Questions
From smart claiming strategies for couples to tips on maximizing your monthly check, we have advice that can help you.
-
Keep Tax Collectors at Bay with Muni Bond Funds
Municipal bonds can be good insurance against inflation — and interest is tax-free. But as with all investments, understanding risk is key.
-
Eight Tips From a Financial Caddie: How to Keep Your Retirement on the Fairway
Think of your financial adviser as a golf caddie — giving you the advice you need to nail the retirement course, avoiding financial bunkers and bogeys.
-
Just Sold Your Business? Avoid These Five Hasty Moves
If you've exited your business, financial advice is likely to be flooding in from all quarters. But wait until the dust settles before making any big moves.
-
You Were Planning to Retire This Year: Should You Go Ahead?
If the economic climate is making you doubt whether you should retire this year, these three questions will help you make up your mind.
-
Are You Owed Money Thanks to the SSFA? You Might Need to Do Something to Get It
The Social Security Fairness Act removed restrictions on benefits for people with government pensions. If you're one of them, don't leave money on the table. Here's how you can be proactive in claiming what you're due.
-
From Wills to Wishes: An Expert Guide to Your Estate Planning Playbook
Consider supplementing your traditional legal documents with this essential road map to guide your loved ones through the emotional and logistical details that will follow your loss.
-
Your Home + Your IRA = Your Long-Term Care Solution
If you're worried that long-term care costs will drain your retirement savings, consider a personalized retirement plan that could solve your problem.
-
I'm a Financial Planner: Retirees Should Never Do These Four Things in a Recession
Recessions are scary business, especially for retirees. They can scare even the most prepared folks into making bad moves — like these.
-
A Retirement Planner's Advice for Taking the Guesswork Out of Income Planning
Once you've saved for retirement, you'll need your nest egg to support you for as many as 30 years. For that, you need a clear income strategy, not guesswork.