The 8% Solution
What rate of return should investors expect these days?
There's a popular tool at Kiplinger.com that lets you figure out whether you're saving enough for retirement. All you do is plug in key information about your salary and savings, along with "the number," the rate at which you expect your money to grow (you can choose 6%, 8% or 10%). Back in the day, few people would have disagreed if you assumed that you could earn the historical return of roughly 10% a year, including dividends, by investing in stocks.
But then came the decade of the aughts, when the overall return for Standard & Poor's 500-stock index was less than aught (-0.95% annualized for the ten years ended December 31, 2009). And now we're in the tenuous teens, when the shock waves from a Grecian burn and trading turbulence on Wall Street can send the market down hundreds of points in the blink of an eye.
(Investors, as evidenced by reader comments on recent Kiplinger articles aimed at both younger investors with decades to save and older workers trying to catch up to retirement, are understandably dialing back their expectations.)
What return should investors expect in the decade ahead? Jeremy Grantham, chief investment strategist for GMO, predicts that a mix of global stocks and what he calls U.S. high-quality blue chips -- those with high returns on equity, low earnings volatility and low leverage -- will return about 8.3% (including inflation of 2.5%) on an annualized basis. But he has significantly lower expectations for other stocks in the S&P 500.
Among market optimists, Kiplinger's columnist Jeremy Siegel predicts that rising profits could result in a real return of 7% -- or close to the historical range of 9% to 10% if you assume inflation of 2% to 3% per year.
We offer our own midyear outlook in our July 2010 cover story. Over the long term, Kiplinger contributing economist Richard DeKaser thinks 7% is realistic (including an inflation factor). And if the stock market is undervalued, as DeKaser suspects it may be, returns could be as high as 8% or 9% over the next decade. (Read An Insider's View of the Economy, from our July 2010 issue, for more of his economic outlook.)
Meanwhile, executive editor Manny Schiffres points out that returns over any ten-year period depend on your starting point. From the vantage point of March 2019, precisely a decade after the recent bear-market low, the ten-year return could be "quite impressive," says Manny.
Gun-shy investors. But there's also a psychological factor, and investors can be forgiven for being wary. In the Thrivent Financial/Kiplinger Survey of Family Finances, nearly three-fourths of those interviewed said recent market volatility has affected the way they handle money, and 55% said they are less willing to take risks. (See the eight threats to the bull market).
So what number should you plug into that retirement calculator? For young people in their twenties whose retirement stash is primarily in stocks, the historical annual return of roughly 10% isn't out of the question. But nobody would accuse you of being imprudent if you assumed an 8% return for the long term -- or 6% for the years leading up to retirement. Just remember that cutting back too much on stocks exposes you to the risk that your savings won't keep up with inflation or that you'll outlive your money. If you had panicked and sold at the bottom of the bear market, you would have missed out on a remarkable surge in stock prices. Through May 10, stocks were up 76% from the market bottom. Now that's a number worth remembering.