Southwest Airlines: Experiencing Turbulence
Shares of the Dallas-based airline might look attractive at current levels, but before you take a flier, remember it's in an industry that has a history of giving investors a case of air sickness.
Every budget traveler has been there. Queued up at the gate, waiting for the flight attendant to call your letter. Passengers asking you if they are in the right line, others trying to cut in. If you're lucky enough to have an "A" on your ticket, you get the run of the whole plane. Take a window seat or plop down in a chair with some extra leg room by the aisle. If you are among the poor unfortunates in the "C" group, expect to be wedged in a middle seat between two obese passengers or left with a spot in the stinky row of seats next to the lavatory in the rear of the plane. Cruel, efficient and profitable -- we all know the cattle call at Southwest Airlines.
Complain about the no-frills service if you must, but Southwest is the best-run airline in the business. The ruthless boarding procedures allow Southwest employees to turn planes around faster, which translates into more flights per day than their competitors. While its rivals wallow in red ink, battle with bankruptcy court or issue a "passenger bill of rights," Dallas-based Southwest squeezes out profits year after year, even during the industry's turbulent patch after the September 11 terrorist attacks.
But for the past seven months, Southwest shares have lagged as the stocks of its financially inferior competitors have rallied. These so-called legacy airlines are saddled with hefty pension costs, overlapping routes and Byzantine bureaucracies. Yet the market has rewarded their investors while more or less ignoring Southwest's. Shares of AMR Corp. (symbol AMR), parent of American Airlines, Continental Airlines (CAL) and UAL (UAUA), parent of United Airlines, have soared 75% to 80% from their August lows. Meanwhile, Southwest (LUV) has fallen 7% in that period. Speculation about industry consolidation and lower fuel prices may have contributed to an outbreak of irrational airline optimism.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Market sentiment has beaten down Southwest shares to bargain prices, says Prudential analyst Bob McAdoo. He upgraded the stock to "overweight" from "neutral" on March 1. McAdoo points out that the stock, which closed at $15.20 on March 2, has historically traded at about 20 times earnings but is now selling at about 15 times his 2007 earnings estimate of $1.01 per share.
Greater market share in Florida bodes well for the airline, McAdoo predicts. As a result, he says, Southwest will report earnings in the second quarter better than what most analysts expect. He estimates that the airline will earn 41 cents in the quarter, versus the average analyst estimate of 34 cents.
McAdoo's arguments are reasonable, but the airline industry does not have a history of rational behavior. Since 1947, the industry as a whole has racked up an estimated $14 billion in net losses, according to the Air Transport Association, a trade group.
Plus, airline stocks have disappointed investors for decades. Even Warren Buffett has sworn off airline stocks, after making an ill-fated investment in US Air in the 1990s. Earnings of airline stocks are notoriously difficult to predict because analysts have to forecast business-travel spending, fuel-price volatility, labor disruptions, bankruptcies and terrorism risk. A foiled terrorism plot by British authorities sparked a sell-off of airline stocks in August. Next week, a spike in fuel prices could cause a similar result. It's hard for investors to know with a great degree of confidence.
Traders can profit from sharp moves in airline stocks, but buy-and-hold investors are better off putting their money elsewhere. McAdoo may be right about Southwest shares, but it's a trip you don't want to take over the long haul.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
-
Dow Trims Its Loss to 498 Points: Stock Market TodayMarkets are wondering more and more about returns on the enormous amounts of capital hyperscalers are investing in AI.
-
5 Mark Cuban Quotes Every Retiree Should Live ByThe billionaire businessman and Shark Tank alum has some advice that may surprise you.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Home Depot Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayHome Depot stock has been a buy-and-hold banger for truly long-term investors.
-
What the Rich Know About Investing That You Don'tPeople like Warren Buffett become people like Warren Buffett by following basic rules and being disciplined. Here's how to accumulate real wealth.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Bank of America Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBank of America stock has been a massive buy-and-hold bust.
-

If You'd Put $1,000 Into Oracle Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayORCL Oracle stock has been an outstanding buy-and-hold bet for decades.
-
How to Invest for Rising Data Integrity RiskAmid a broad assault on venerable institutions, President Trump has targeted agencies responsible for data critical to markets. How should investors respond?
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Sherwin-Williams Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodaySherwin-Williams stock has clobbered the broader market by a wide margin for a long time.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UnitedHealth Group Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUNH stock was a massive market beater for ages — until it wasn't.
-
What Tariffs Mean for Your Sector ExposureNew, higher and changing tariffs will ripple through the economy and into share prices for many quarters to come.