Smith & Wesson: Packing Heat
The famous gunmaker is setting its sights on new contracts.
Who can forget the .44 Magnum immortalized by Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry. Gunmaker Smith Wesson also made history with its .38 Special, a standard police revolver for a century. But that's the trouble with the venerable, 154-year-old Springfield, Mass.-based gunsmith: too much living on legend.
Decades back, Smith Wesson held a near-monopoly on the law-enforcement market. Then SW's market share collapsed because the company failed to scoot fast enough from revolvers into pistols and higher-powered firearms that help outgunned cops fight the bad guys.
Lee Schulteis, who runs Alpha Hedged Strategies Fund, a mutual fund that employs hedging strategies, thinks SW (symbol SWB) is being reborn. He dates the turnaround from when new leadership took control in late 2004. Leveraging a highly recognizable, respected brand name (thank you, Hollywood), SW beefed up advertising and marketing to the recreational market and developed new lines of weapons, such as pistols and rifles for the military, and less-than-lethal technologies. The company is winning local law-enforcement contracts again and has garnered a series of contracts with federal agencies, including one to supply 75,000 guns to the Afghan army.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Smith Wesson's factories are running at only 50% of capacity. Schulteis sees that as a good thing. It's one reason he thinks the arms maker is in a strong position to win a U.S. military contract for 645,000 pistols worth between $300 million and $500 million. It helps that two rival bidders, Beretta and Glock, are both foreign outfits.
Revenues are growing 20% a year, but Smith Wesson has predicted a 50% increase in earnings, to $7.5 million to $8 million, in the fiscal year that ended April 30. The company forecasts profits of $12.5 million, or 30 cents a share, in the current fiscal year. Given the rate at which SW is winning new weapons contracts, Schulteis thinks the company could easily exceed earnings expectations.
The stock has gone ballistic, tripling to $6.62 since early 2005. Schulteis thinks the stock can trade at $9 to $10 over the next six to 12 months, and at $12 to $15 if Smith Wesson pulls down some large contracts. The company currently has a market value of about $260 million.
--Andrew Tanzer
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
-
What Tariffs Mean for Your Sector Exposure
New, higher and changing tariffs will ripple through the economy and into share prices for many quarters to come.
-
How to Invest for a Fall Interest Rate Cut by the Fed
A lot can happen between now and then, but the probability the Fed cuts interest rates in September is back above 80%.
-
Are Buffett and Berkshire About to Bail on Kraft Heinz Stock?
Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway own a lot of Kraft Heinz stock, so what happens when they decide to sell KHC?
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First 6 Months of Trump's Second Term
Six months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Berkshire Hathaway Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have Today
Berkshire Hathaway is a long-time market beater, but the easy money in BRK.B has already been made.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Procter & Gamble Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have Today
Procter & Gamble stock is a dependable dividend grower, but a disappointing long-term holding.
-
My Three-Day Rule for Investing: And If it Applies Now
Stock Market I've seen a lot in my career. Here's what I see now in the stock market.
-
Is It Time to Invest in Europe?
Stock Market Europe is being shaken out of its lethargy, militarily and otherwise, by Donald Trump's changes in U.S. policy. Should investors start buying?