Scientific Games gets paid whether you win or lose. The company supplies equipment to run state lotteries and pari-mutuel betting at dog and horse race tracks. Lately, the New York City company has been on a roll, buying businesses that extend its gambling franchise to more countries. Citigroup analyst Geoffrey Davis rates the stock (symbol SGMS) a buy based on the potential for Scientific Games to use its size to win more business overseas, particularly in Germany.
In 1974, Scientific Games produced the first scratch-off ticket for the Massachusetts lottery. Now the company makes 15 million scratch-off tickets per year, making it the dominant player in the instant-ticket business with a 65% share of the market.
Scientific Games is also involved in lotteries, such as Powerball, in which players buy a ticket and wait for a television drawing. In January, the company bought Stockholm, Sweden-based rival EssNet for $60 million. EssNet runs online lotteries in Australia and Europe, including those in 13 of 16 German states. "EssNet's online lottery relationships should help the company compete for new instant-ticket business in Germany," Davis says. In March, Scientific Games began operating two German instant-games contracts that Davis believes will add $8 million, or 9 cents a share, to yearly profits. Moreover, he says, the acquisition puts the company in position to vie for at least a dozen more deals in Germany.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
EssNet is only the start of Scientific Games' spending spree. Pending regulatory approvals, the company expects the $183 million purchase of Global Draw, a maker of sports-betting machines in the United Kingdom, to be completed by June. And on April 5, Scientific Games bought a Connecticut betting parlor for $12 million. Scientific Games runs nearly all the off-track betting facilities in Connecticut and operates all on-track and off-track pari-mutuel wagering in the Netherlands under a license that lasts until June 2008.
Despite the moves into other kinds of gambling, the bulk of Scientific Games business is lotteries, which offer a steady stream of recurring revenues. All told, the company generated revenues of $782 million last year, about 75% coming from its lottery operations. It earned $75 million, or 81 cents per share.
Shares of Scientific Games, at $35, are near their all-time high. The stock trades at 28 times the $1.27 per share that analysts, on average, expect the company to earn this year, according to Thomson First Call. Davis thinks the company's gamble on the international lottery market could boost 2006 profits to $1.32 per share. That and future overseas growth makes the stock worth $42.50 a share, he says.
--Thomas M. Anderson
-
$100 Fee Turning Away Visitors from National ParksDiscover how the new $100 fee will impact your experience visiting 11 of America's most popular parks.
-
Is Mechanical Breakdown Insurance Better Than an Extended Car Warranty?More insurers are starting to offer mechanical breakdown insurance to new car owners. What is it and should you buy it?
-
What to Do When You Bank Lowers Your APYWhy banks lower APYs, options you can explore when it happens and whether more rate cuts are on the horizon.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Lowe's Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayLowe's stock has delivered disappointing returns recently, but it's been a great holding for truly patient investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into 3M Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayMMM stock has been a pit of despair for truly long-term shareholders.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Coca-Cola Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayEven with its reliable dividend growth and generous stock buybacks, Coca-Cola has underperformed the broad market in the long term.
-
If You Put $1,000 into Qualcomm Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You Would Have TodayQualcomm stock has been a big disappointment for truly long-term investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Home Depot Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayHome Depot stock has been a buy-and-hold banger for truly long-term investors.
-
What the Rich Know About Investing That You Don'tPeople like Warren Buffett become people like Warren Buffett by following basic rules and being disciplined. Here's how to accumulate real wealth.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Bank of America Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBank of America stock has been a massive buy-and-hold bust.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Oracle Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayORCL Oracle stock has been an outstanding buy-and-hold bet for decades.
