Amgen: Biotech Value
Shares of this biotechnology giant have suffered -- yet the company's pipeline and growth strategy look as healthy as ever.
Sometimes stocks get sick even when their companies are in good health. Take biotech giant Amgen. Five years ago, its stock traded in the mid $60s; Monday it closed at $68. Over those same five years, Amgen's sales more than tripled, from $4.0 billion to $12.4 billion, and earnings per share nearly tripled, from $1.03 to $2.93 in 2005.
The upshot: Amgen (AMGN) is a growth stock trading at a value price. Analysts, on average, expect earnings of $3.66 per share this year and $4.14 next year. That puts Amgen's price-earnings ratio at 19 based on '06 estimates and at 16 based on '07 forecasts. At the same time, analysts expect earnings growth of 15% annually over the next few years.
Unlike most biotech companies, which drip gobs of red ink, Amgen is immensely profitable. Operating profit margins are about 40% of sales. Key blockbuster products include Aranesp, for anemia associated with kidney failure and chemotherapy; Neulasta, to help the immune system in chemotherapy patients; and Enbrel, for rheumatoid arthritis.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Amgen's pipeline of potential new products is rich, too. The company has several new drugs for cancer, as well as a medication for osteoporosis, in clinical trials. In addition, existing drugs are being tested for new applications. Most notably, Aranesp shows promise in preventing heart failure in patients with diabetes.
The stock has been beaten down this year in tandem with other biotech stocks. In addition, Amgen and Roche are battling in the courts over whether Roche can introduce a competitor to Aranesp in the U.S. But even giving Roche a 50% chance of winning that litigation, Bank of America analyst David Witzke recommends buying Amgen. "We believe Amgen should be a core holding in biotech and would look to use recent weakness to add to positions." Wachovia Securities analyst George Farmer on Monday upgraded Amgen to a buy, citing potential for its osteoporosis medication to be on the market in 2008 -- a year ahead of Wall Street expectations.
Amgen isn't just inventing new medications. Awash with cash, the company is buying up promising, small biotechs. It acquired Abgenix this year and Tularik last year. It recently set up a corporate venture fund to invest in other biotech firms. Amgen also has the heft to do its own marketing, as well as to market for smaller biotech companies, without having to enlist a big pharmaceutical firm.
Among the pessimists, Merrill Lynch analyst Eric Ende worries that in the short run Amgen could be a "value trap" -- that is a stock that seems cheap, but still falls. Ende is concerned about the Roche litigation and possible competition for other Amgen drugs. Plus, he sees little chance for any of Amgen's new drugs to be on the market until 2007.
Still, with the shares so cheap and the company so powerful, these are risks that may be worth accepting.
--Steven Goldberg
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
-
The Best (and Worst) Airlines for Flight Delays and CancelationsWhich airlines should you book and which should you avoid if you want to make it to your destination on time?
-
I Tried a New AI Tool to Answer One of the Hardest Retirement Questions We All FaceAs a veteran financial journalist, I tried the free AI-powered platform, Waterlily. Here's how it provided fresh insights into my retirement plan — and might help you.
-
Stocks Rally as Investors Buy the Dip: Stock Market TodayMost sectors are "go" only a day after talk of bubbles, extended valuations and narrow breadth undermined any kind of exuberance.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Home Depot Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayHome Depot stock has been a buy-and-hold banger for truly long-term investors.
-
What the Rich Know About Investing That You Don'tPeople like Warren Buffett become people like Warren Buffett by following basic rules and being disciplined. Here's how to accumulate real wealth.
-
S&P 500 Sees New Highs on Shutdown Day: Stock Market TodayMost of its components were in the red, but the S&P 500 Index still managed to hit a new intraday all-time high.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Bank of America Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBank of America stock has been a massive buy-and-hold bust.
-

If You'd Put $1,000 Into Oracle Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayORCL Oracle stock has been an outstanding buy-and-hold bet for decades.
-
How to Invest for Rising Data Integrity RiskAmid a broad assault on venerable institutions, President Trump has targeted agencies responsible for data critical to markets. How should investors respond?
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Sherwin-Williams Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodaySherwin-Williams stock has clobbered the broader market by a wide margin for a long time.