Not All Fiduciaries Are Created Equal
There are different kinds of fiduciaries, and some offer more layers of protection than others. So make sure you understand the nuances behind the designations.
Financial advisers who serve as fiduciaries, like those at my firm and me, live by a simple rule: Act in the best interests of our clients. This philosophy is the underpinning for the financial advisory industry’s “Fiduciary Standard.”
But the word “fiduciary” is truly a sophist’s dream. There’s a veritable alphabet soup of letters and numbers that can let certain actors play games with what the meaning of “fiduciary” truly obligates them to do and the way they must act.
Investors with money in their company’s 401(k) plan should know that there’s a difference between the two primary codified definitions of a fiduciary. The first is known as a 3(21) fiduciary; the second is a 3(38). These are both so-named for their sections under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA, which is administered by the Department of Labor.
The distinction is important for sponsors and asset owners in company plans to know. The primary difference between a 3(21) and 3(38) fiduciary is that the former makes “recommendations” on plan assets, with the employer/plan sponsor having the final decision. In contrast, a 3(38) fiduciary has control and management of the plan assets fully delegated to them.
When is a Fiduciary Not a Fiduciary?
For many company plan sponsors and asset owners that do not possess the requisite time and/or talent under ERISA to administer their investments, an outsourced investment adviser may appear to be an ideal solution.
On its surface, hiring an adviser appears to “offshore” some of the liability inherent with managing a large and highly regulated pool of other people’s money. However, the simple act of hiring an adviser does not, in fact, mitigate the risk for the plan’s fiduciaries.
Under ERISA section 404(a)(1)(B), plan sponsor fiduciaries — such as those who administer 401(k) plans and the like — are required to exercise the “highest standard of care.” The law mandates that these fiduciaries act:
- “With the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims.”
This “prudent man” standard often comes into play when non-investment professional fiduciaries — such as employers who offer benefit plans to their workers — are put in the position of making investment decisions for others. This can create an immediate liability. There are several procedural criteria used by courts to determine if prudence was used that we won’t delve into here, but as you can see, fiduciary determinations and decisions are quite complex. This observation begins to make a strong case for outsourcing liability given these various legal gray areas.
One way plan sponsors can mitigate fiduciary liability is to hire a 3(21) or 3(38) fiduciary. This should be codified in your company’s management agreement and in an Investment Policy Statement (IPS) to document the processes and procedures around who is responsible for making investment decisions and why those decisions are being made. Just make sure you understand the difference in responsibility.
A truly outsourced investment fiduciary under ERISA is identified as a Section 3(38) fiduciary, so named for the 38th definition in the ERISA law. However, all fiduciaries for a retirement plan also fall under the definition of a Section 3(21) fiduciary.
It is important to note that while a section 3(21) fiduciary may de facto arise from certain actions and involvement with the plan’s assets, a 3(38) fiduciary designation must be accepted explicitly by the third party. Plan sponsors often assume that their investment adviser is a 3(38) fiduciary automatically, thereby absolving them of certain responsibilities. If, in fact, the investment adviser is only a 3(21) fiduciary, certain liabilities will be placed back on the shoulders of the plan sponsor.
Again, the complexities, vagaries and nuances of fiduciary rules under ERISA, combined with the severe consequences for even inadvertent violation, seem to mandate work with a true and knowledgeable fiduciary.
The bottom line for investors is to check with your company's plan administrator to see exactly what kind of "fiduciary" is minding your money: A 3(38) fiduciary offers more protection — to your plan sponsor and to your own future."
In subsequent pieces we’ll unpack the byzantine nature of the ERISA world further, addressing questions such as:
- What's the difference between Suitability and Fiduciary, and why should you care?
- What does Rules vs. Principal regulation mean, and why should you care?
- If things go wrong, who's on the hook — your adviser, or you?
- How can you protect yourself?
Joseph F. Bert, CFP®, AIF®, the Founder of Certified Financial Group, Inc., has been in the financial planning profession since 1976. He is also President of Certified Advisory Corp. Joe is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional and a member of the Financial Planning Association where he served as its President and Chairman.
About the Author
Joe Bert, CFP®, AIF®
Chairman and CEO, Certified Financial Group, Inc.
Joe Bert, CFP® is the Chairman and CEO of Certified Financial Group, Inc. and has been in the financial planning profession since 1976. Joe can be heard every Saturday in Orlando, FL on News 96.5 FM at 9:00 a.m. EST hosting On the Money and seen twice weekly on the Fox TV affiliate, WOFL Fox 35. An experienced and knowledgeable financial planning practitioner, he has been affectionately referred to as the "Oracle of Orlando®" by his audience.