3 Out-of-the-Box Proposals to Fix the Student Loan Mess
Education gurus push novel solutions to the debt problem.
The numbers are eye-popping. Student loan debt in the U.S. now stands at $1.1 trillion, with a current rate of default approaching 15% for loans within three years of beginning repayment. Still, fears of a crisis on the order of the recent mortgage meltdown seem overblown, with two in five borrowers on the hook for less than $10,000. What’s scary is that you don’t need an exorbitant loan balance to face financial hardship. The highest rate of late payments is among borrowers with outstanding loans of less than $5,000, says Beth Akers, a fellow at the Brookings Institution. Clearly, the current college-financing system is in need of repair, if not outright overhaul. To learn how to borrow wisely, see The Right Way to Borrow for College. For three out-of-the-box proposals to fix the student loan market over the long term, read on.
See Our Slide Show: 9 Ways to Reduce Your Student Loan Debt
1. Streamline repayment. Replace the bewildering array of existing options for repaying federal loans with a single, income-based plan, says economics professor Daniel Kreisman, of Georgia State University. After leaving college, borrowers would be automatically enrolled in the program. Your employer would deduct a fraction of your paycheck to apply toward the debt (you’d check a box on your W-4 form if you have a loan to repay), starting at 3% on the first $10,000 of income and rising as earnings increase, to a cap of 10%. Interest rates would fluctuate with market rates, and your contributions would stop when the loan was repaid or after 25 years. You could indicate on your W-4 that you want to pay back the loan faster.
Drawback: The plan could stretch out the typical 10-year payback period, increasing the amount of interest paid.
2. Give colleges skin in the game. Schools already lose access to federal aid if their students’ default rates soar. But some experts want colleges to pay as much as 20% of the losses incurred on bad loans at their school. “The lender takes all the risk. The student has the obligation to pay. But colleges just get the money,” says finance scholar Alex Pollock, of the American Enterprise Institute. Sharing the risk puts more of the onus on schools to keep academic standards high and ensure students’ success.
Drawback: Schools that serve high-risk populations might be unfairly penalized.
3. Let investors foot the bill. Income-sharing agreements, or ISAs, give investors the right to a slice of a student’s future earnings for a fixed period. Agreements are tailor-made; terms might be more favorable for an engineering major in a top program than for a humanities student at a lower-tier school. Lest you think that all the money would go to Harvard financiers, consider that you’d expect abundant funding at, say, a community college with ties to area employers and a strong vocational bent. The beauty of this human-capital market is that it alerts prospective students to high-quality, low-cost programs, says Vanderbilt finance professor Miguel Palacios, cofounder of Lumni, one of a few firms making such deals. Regulatory uncertainty about ISAs are for now their biggest hurdle.
Drawback: Fields of study deemed valuable by society but not necessarily lucrative might find it hard to tap the ISA market.