The Claremont McKenna Controversy
Falsified SAT data earn the school a black eye . . . and removal from Kiplinger's ranking of Best College Values.
- (opens in new tab)
- (opens in new tab)
- (opens in new tab)
- Newsletter sign up Newsletter
Claremont McKenna College, a small, private liberal arts college about 30 miles east of Los Angeles, was ranked number 18 in Kiplinger's latest 100 Best Values in Private Colleges. Announced in our December 2011 issue and in a highly popular Web story on Kiplinger.com, the rankings focus on schools with strong academic qualities that also meet our definition of affordability -- based on total cost, need- and non-need-based aid, and average student debt upon graduation.
SEE OUR SPECIAL REPORT: Best College Values, 2012
Last week, however, we learned that the school had provided deliberately falsified SAT scores of incoming freshmen -- one of the factors we use to measure academic competitiveness. To preserve the integrity of our rankings, we pulled Claremont McKenna from the list. After recomputing the rankings based on what the college says is accurate SAT data, we discovered that the inflated figures did not give the school an advantage in our rankings. Honest data would have earned Claremont McKenna the number-18 ranking. Still, the school will not be reinstated to the 2012 rankings.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
"After careful deliberation, we believe that the best way to preserve the integrity of our rankings -- and the trust our readers put in them -- is to make it clear that deliberate falsification of the data will not be tolerated," said Kevin McCormally, editorial director of Kiplinger. "Any school found to have submitted falsified data -- whether via self-disclosure or thanks to a whistle-blower -- will not be included in Kiplinger's rankings."
How Kiplinger's ranks colleges
Jane Bennett Clark, Kiplinger's senior editor who oversees the annual college ranking project, explains that the magazine uses objective criteria to measure academic quality and affordability -- our definition of value. On the quality side, which is more heavily weighted, the measures include admission rate, student-faculty ratio and SAT scores of incoming freshmen. On the cost side, our criteria include total cost of attendance, average financial aid and average debt on graduation among students who borrow.
We don't inject subjective opinions of college presidents on the merits of competing colleges, Clark notes, or the results of student surveys on the best school for "Birkenstock-wearing, tree-hugging, clove-smoking vegetarians." We have concocted no whimsical categories, such as "least rigorous" or "best weather" or "happiest students."
The numbers we use come from the colleges, via our data provider, Peterson's, a division of education services firm Nelnet, or through our own reporting. We vet the numbers, some 4,000 of them, for sense and consistency with previous years, but we also rely on the colleges to report them accurately and honestly. If we see a number that looks too high or too low, we follow up with the college and adjust, if necessary.
For all that, our rankings rely largely on the honor system. If a college deliberately submits false data, as was the case with Claremont McKenna, it undermines the very outcome we are trying to achieve: an objective assessment of best college values.
That's why we dropped Claremont McKenna from this year's rankings -- not from a desire to punish what by all accounts is a fine school, but to reassert our commitment to fairness, accuracy and integrity, and to put colleges on notice that we will tolerate no less. We expect to include Claremont McKenna in next year’s rankings for its longstanding, and legitimate, record for value.
The SAT scandal
That's what they’re calling this issue at Claremont McKenna. The Claremont Port Side, a campus publication, reports that the school’s longtime dean of admissions, Richard Vos, "systematically manipulated" SAT data for years. (The school says that privacy laws and college personnel policy prevent it from disclosing the name of the person involved but says the responsible individual has resigned.) A Port Side analysis of the inflated data found that since 2005, SAT verbal scores were exaggerated by an average of more than 17 points (out of 800 total) and math scores by an average of 10.5 points (out of 800).
Marc Wojno, Kiplinger chief of research, says that such discrepancies might well have affected the Kiplinger rankings. But the inflation in the 2010 data used in the latest rankings was more modest. There was no exaggeration in the math scores, for example, and just four points were added to reported verbal scores.
Is cheating widespread?
Excellent reporting on the Claremont McKenna story by New York Times reporter Daniel E. Slotnik has focused attention on college rankings in general. "The inaccurate numbers were a rare example of an institute of higher learning falsifying data submitted to a rankings agency," Slotnik wrote, "and appear to be the work of an individual . . . But Claremont McKenna College was far from alone. Many schools employ a variety of manipulative, if not deceitful, methods to alter their appearance before rankings organizations."
For more on attempts at gaming the system, read the New York Times' article, Gaming the College Rankings (opens in new tab).
-
-
Personal Finance Tips for the Year of the Rabbit
Being intelligent like a rabbit by making smart choices about spending and saving, paying attention to details and exercising patience in investing can help increase financial security.
By Marguerita M. Cheng, CFP® • Published
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Drop After Bleak Big Tech Earnings, Jobs Shocker
Apple (AAPL), Amazon.com (AMZN) and Alphabet (GOOGL) all reported quarterly profit that fell short of estimates.
By Karee Venema • Published
-
Best Cash Back Credit Cards February 2023
Smart Buying Looking for the credit card that pays the most cash back? These lenders may pay hundreds of dollars, with minimum hassle.
By Lisa Gerstner • Last updated
-
I-Bond Rate Is 6.89% for Next Six Months
Investing for Income If you missed out on the opportunity to buy I-bonds at their recent high, don’t despair. The new rate is still good, and even has a little sweetener built in.
By David Muhlbaum • Last updated
-
What Are I-Bonds?
savings bonds Inflation has made Series I savings bonds enormously popular with risk-averse investors. How do they work?
By Lisa Gerstner • Last updated
-
Your Guide to Open Enrollment 2023
Employee Benefits Health care costs continue to climb, but subsidies will make some plans more affordable.
By Rivan V. Stinson • Published
-
Watch Out for Flood-Damaged Cars from Hurricane Ian
Buying & Leasing a Car In the wake of Hurricane Ian, more flood-damaged cars may hit the market. Car prices may rise further because of increased demand as well.
By Bob Niedt • Last updated
-
What You Need to Know About Life Insurance Settlements
life insurance If your life insurance payments don’t seem worth it anymore, consider these options for keeping the value.
By David Rodeck • Published
-
Best Travel Rewards Credit Cards February 2023
credit cards Business road warriors and leisure travelers can use travel rewards credit cards to turn miles logged into other things — including more travel.
By Lisa Gerstner • Last updated
-
What Is APR?
credit & debt Even for those who pay off their credit card balances every month, knowing your APR is part of keeping good credit habits.
By Rivan V. Stinson • Published