Are Speed Cameras a Trap?

Camera placement should be determined by public safety concerns, not revenue potential.

Q. My city contracted with a company to install speed-activated cameras on our streets, ostensibly to reduce accidents and improve pedestrian safety. The city shares the robust ticket revenue with the company, which seems to have a say in where the cameras are installed.

Very few cameras were placed on busy, congested streets—where speeding would be most dangerous, but where it is difficult to drive at even the posted speed and revenue from tickets would be low. The champion revenue generator is a camera in a long underpass with a 25 mph limit—four divided lanes, no cross streets, no pedestrian access, where motorists can safely make up a little time without endangering anyone. Your thoughts, please.

Subscribe to Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Save up to 74%
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hwgJ7osrMtUWhk5koeVme7-200-80.png

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

Sign up

To continue reading this article
please register for free

This is different from signing in to your print subscription


Why am I seeing this? Find out more here

Knight Kiplinger
Editor Emeritus, Kiplinger

Knight came to Kiplinger in 1983, after 13 years in daily newspaper journalism, the last six as Washington bureau chief of the Ottaway Newspapers division of Dow Jones. A frequent speaker before business audiences, he has appeared on NPR, CNN, Fox and CNBC, among other networks. Knight contributes to the weekly Kiplinger Letter.