Employers Left in the Dark on New Mental Health Law
The mental health parity law takes effect Jan. 1, but critical guidance that companies need is still a long way off.

Implementation of the mental health parity law is proving to be another huge headache for employers. The law requires that benefits provided by employers for the treatment of mental illnesses and substance abuse be on a par with other medical and surgical benefits. The effective date is Jan. 1 for health plans on a calendar year, but the agencies in charge of writing the implementation rules have yet to produce them. “There are a lot of open questions and no guidance from the government,” says Kaye Pestaina of The Segal Company.
One key question is whether it’s OK to have separate deductibles. Employer groups say the law does allow that, and lacking contrary guidance, many companies are deciding to go that route. Employers that use a different vendor for mental health benefits than for other health benefits say separate deductibles are a must because of coordination problems. “A single deductible would result in a substantial and costly administrative burden to the plan,” say the American Benefits Council and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in a letter to the Department of Labor.
But congressional supporters of the legislation wrote in a recent letter to regulators that “separate but equal” is not parity. They said it’s discriminatory and “should be prohibited.”
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Copays are also an issue. Many plans have higher copays for specialists than for primary care doctors, and they want to use the higher ones for mental illnesses, regardless of the provider’s credentials. “Group health plans should be permitted to classify all mental health providers as specialists and apply the plan’s specialist co-pay to such providers,” say the council and the Chamber in their letter.
Another ambiguous issue involves the scope of services. Employers want confirmation that it’s up to the plan sponsor to determine what’s a covered benefit and what isn’t. Just as employers can decide not to cover certain medical services, such as chiropractic care or fertility treatments, they must be able to do the same in the area of mental health, they say. But in their letter to regulators, lawmakers asserted that the law intended that patients have access “to the full scope of services, medically appropriate for their condition.”
Employers can seek a one-year exemption from the parity law if their costs go up by 2% or more in 2010 or at least 1% in subsequent years. Employer groups have asked regulators to allow firms that qualify for an exemption one year to have an actuary make a forecast of costs for subsequent years.
Regulators are expected to go easy on enforcement the first year, especially since no guidance was available for employers as they were making decisions on how to comply with the law. As long as employers make a good faith effort to comply, regulators won’t take enforcement action against them.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

-
These Stocks Dipped in 2025. Do They Have Value?
If you are looking to add new long-term positions to your portfolio, as you should, this is the time to examine stocks that the market shuns.
-
Striking Gold (or Gas): A Financial Pro Unpacks the Nuances of Energy Investing
Investing in the energy industry, particularly oil and gas, involves understanding the facts about how projects generate returns through cash flow and long-term asset building, while also being aware of the risks.
-
Apple Readies for AI Upgrade with New iPhones
The Kiplinger Letter The tech giant has stumbled when it comes to artificial intelligence, but a new batch of iPhones will help it make headway.
-
Japan Enters a New Era of Risk and Reform
The Kiplinger Letter Japan has entered a pivotal moment in its economic history, undertaking ambitious policy and structural reforms to escape from decades of stagnation.
-
How Consumers Are Tinkering with Cutting-Edge AI
The Kiplinger Letter Companies launching artificial intelligence tools are jostling for consumer attention. Some products are already building a deep connection with users.
-
After Years of Stagnant Growth, Hope Emerges for EU Economy
The Kiplinger Letter Can a German fiscal push outweigh French political peril?
-
Small Businesses Are Racing to Use AI
The Kiplinger Letter Spurred on by competitive pressures, small businesses are racing to adopt AI. A recent snapshot shows the technology’s day-to-day uses.
-
How AI Puts Company Data at Risk
The Kiplinger Letter Cybersecurity professionals are racing to ward off AI threats while also using AI tools to shore up defenses.
-
AI Start-ups Are Rolling in Cash
The Kiplinger Letter Investors are plowing record sums of money into artificial intelligence start-ups. Even as sales grow swiftly, losses are piling up for AI firms.
-
What is AI Worth to the Economy?
The Letter Spending on AI is already boosting GDP, but will the massive outlays being poured into the technology deliver faster economic growth in the long run?