Advertisement
Economic Forecasts

What to Do About Tax Reform

You can't keep marginal rates low if you allow deductions for such items as mortgage interest.

Tax reform is the number-one concern of financial markets.

The first big item is how we should tax the returns on savings, specifically dividends and capital gains. Some argue that we should exempt these sources of income because saving is necessary for economic growth and because the income that investors receive has already been taxed, when it was earned by the company.

I believe that investors who accumulate huge fortunes should pay some taxes on their investment income. But a strong argument can be made that income generated from wealth, particularly dividends and capital gains, should be taxed at a preferential rate. That's because, unlike interest, dividends are not deductible from the corporate tax. Dividends are first taxed as corporate earnings, and taxing them again at the full rates for ordinary income would be double taxation.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Some preference should be given to risk-takers, so capital gains should also qualify for lower tax rates. The tax code greatly restricts the ability of investors to deduct capital losses in excess of gains. As a result, risk-taking would be reduced if some break isn't given to an investor who turns up on the winning side of an investment.

The Republicans want to retain the 15% rate on capital gains and dividends, while the Democrats want to raise it to its former level of 20%. A compromise of 17.5% sounds reasonable, although high-income investors will also pay an extra 3.8% to help finance the new health care law. That would bring the total to above 20%, but that is still below the Clinton-era capital-gains rate of 28%.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

Keeping rates low. When it comes to ordinary income, economists want to keep marginal tax rates as low as possible so that workers have an incentive to earn more. But you can't keep marginal rates low if you allow deductions for such items as mortgage interest, taxes and charitable giving. Many people favor eliminating the mortgage deduction because mortgage payments don't benefit the public at large. Furthermore, given today's extra-ordinarily low rates, the write-off is worth comparatively less, so I don't believe that disallowing the interest deduction would restrain the housing recovery.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Instead of trying to decide which deductions are justified, perhaps the best solution is to cap the total amount of deductions taxpayers are allowed, with a five-year phaseout of the mortgage deduction. I would cap total deductions at, say, $20,000 or 10% of adjusted gross income, whichever is higher. The one exception I might make is for charitable giving. It's difficult to say how much of the hundreds of billions of dollars donated to charitable causes by very-high-income individuals would disappear if the deduction did not exist. My recommendation: Allow an additional deduction for charitable contributions equal to 10% of income.

I'm not persuaded by arguments calling for the complete elimination of the estate tax on the grounds that income that has already been taxed once should not be taxed again. That's because the wealth in most large estates has been created by the accumulation of substantial capital gains. I do favor reducing the tax rates and providing an estate-tax exemption of about $4 million, but there is a good argument that large amounts of wealth should not be passed down without some of it going to the public coffers, either through taxes or charitable giving. Another idea with merit is to allow lifetime charitable contributions to be deductible against the estate tax instead of against ordinary income.

I recall Milton Friedman once saying that major tax reforms that eliminate special deductions and subsidies come once every 30 or 40 years -- so politicians can give them away again in the future. Perhaps, but we all have to clean out our closets occasionally.

Columnist Jeremy J. Siegel is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and the author of Stocks for the Long Run and The Future for Investors.

Kiplinger's Investing for Income will help you maximize your cash yield under any economic conditions. Subscribe now!

Advertisement

Most Popular

What Are the Income Tax Brackets for 2020 vs. 2019?
tax brackets

What Are the Income Tax Brackets for 2020 vs. 2019?

The IRS unveiled the 2020 tax brackets, and it's never too early to start planning to minimize your future tax bill.
June 20, 2020
Tax Changes and Key Amounts for the 2020 Tax Year
tax law

Tax Changes and Key Amounts for the 2020 Tax Year

Americans are facing a long list of tax changes for the 2020 tax year...and it's never too early to start thinking about next year's return.
June 22, 2020
10 Tax Breaks for the Middle Class
tax deductions

10 Tax Breaks for the Middle Class

Tax breaks aren't just for the rich. There are plenty of them that are only available to middle- and low-income Americans.
June 30, 2020

Recommended

8 Ways You Might Be Cheating on Your Taxes
taxes

8 Ways You Might Be Cheating on Your Taxes

Don't fall into these common traps that can get you in hot water with the IRS.
July 8, 2020
2020 Tax Deadline: When Are Tax Returns Due This Year?
tax deadline

2020 Tax Deadline: When Are Tax Returns Due This Year?

The April 15 deadline for filing your 2019 federal income tax return (and paying taxes) has been moved back...but the new due date is approaching fast…
July 8, 2020
How to Get an Extension for Filing Your Tax Return
tax deadline

How to Get an Extension for Filing Your Tax Return

If you can't wrap up your tax return by the July 15 deadline, it's easy to buy yourself more time.
July 7, 2020
Tax Tips for Last-Minute Filing
tax deadline

Tax Tips for Last-Minute Filing

As you rush to meet the July 15 tax filing deadline, here are some pointers to bring your stress level down.
July 7, 2020