Should Employers Check My Credit Before Hiring?
Credit checks should be allowed, and job applicants should have the right to explain negative information.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Q: Do you think it is ethical for businesses to use a job applicant's credit report and rating in the hiring process? I have a feeling that I have been hurt by this practice.
This is a hot subject these days, and it's the basis for a number of lawsuits that challenge the growing practice and seek to ban any use of credit-report checks in hiring decisions. (Editor's note: Employers do not use credit scores for this purpose.)
There are various reasons for a spotty credit record, including limited previous use of credit, which shouldn't be held against anyone. Some people get into credit trouble because of unforeseen crises, such as a severe illness with big medical bills or a lengthy layoff with no severance.
Article continues belowFrom just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Other people, whatever their income, simply live beyond their means on a regular basis, overspending on credit. To some employers, that would raise a warning flag about an applicant's possible lack of self-discipline -- and maybe even lack of integrity. And employers might reasonably be concerned that an employee's money woes could tempt him or her to steal or to pad an expense account.
Whatever the courts eventually decree in pending lawsuits, I think the most ethical outcome would be a middle ground -- allowing the continued use of credit checks in evaluating job applicants but giving applicants the right to explain negative information in their reports. (I also think that arrest records -- say, for disorderly conduct or DUIs -- may ethically be used in evaluating job applicants, with a similar right for applicants to explain the infractions.)
Employers could still use a credit history as one of numerous factors in evaluating someone's fitness for a job, but no one could be rejected simply on the basis of that history.
So many candidates with similar qualifications -- education, special skills and job experience -- are looking for work these days that it's understandable if employers often look for small differentiating factors (positive and negative) to help them make decisions. Credit history can be one of these.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Knight came to Kiplinger in 1983, after 13 years in daily newspaper journalism, the last six as Washington bureau chief of the Ottaway Newspapers division of Dow Jones. A frequent speaker before business audiences, he has appeared on NPR, CNN, Fox and CNBC, among other networks. Knight contributes to the weekly Kiplinger Letter.