Tallying Up the Financial Rescue
Government inventions are winding down, but there's still cash flowing out and billions outstanding. What can we expect to get back?
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
The government’s massive financial rescue effort is winding down. Two years after global financial meltdown threatened -- with the collapse of Bear Stearns and Lehman Bros., and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rapidly heading south -- it’s impossible to tell exactly how much the final price tag will be. But odds are that when all loans that can be repaid are repaid and all assets acquired in the effort are sold off, the tab will come to between $300 billion and $450 billion. Compared with the savings and loan bailout in the 1990s, the tally will be at least twice as much in dollar terms, though about the same, if measured as a percentage of gross domestic product.
Parts of the package are already gone or soon will be. A money market fund guarantee from the Federal Reserve disappeared months ago. Fed programs for purchasing commercial paper, lending to securities firms to keep them afloat and purchasing debt backed by small business, car and other loans have all served their purpose and will end shortly, with little taxpayer cost. Ditto, loaning dollars to foreign banks to help them thaw credit markets, though recent troubles in Greece gave that initiative new life.
Other changes, such as an increase in the ceiling for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s insurance of bank deposits, will be permanent. Raised from $100,000 per account to $250,000 in the heat of the crisis, the higher limit will be stipulated by law as part of federal financial regulatory reform legislation now working its way through Congress.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Many big-bucks programs will linger. Subsidies for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, intended to keep home mortgage funds flowing and ward off collapse of housing markets, will continue through at least 2013, for example. So far, Washington has shelled out about $145 billion to make good on sour loans guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The final tab could climb to as much as $400 billion by the time the quasi-governmental institutions wring out all the bad loans made.
Uncle Sam also has $13 billion left of a $50-billion program to help homeowners avoid foreclosures. None of that money will ever come back to Treasury, at least not directly. But to the extent that it helps buoy housing markets -- which won’t be much because more than half the homeowners it helps will default again -- it will help keep the economy growing.
In addition, the Federal Reserve remains deeply enmeshed in mortgage markets. Although it recently stopped buying long-term bonds -- mostly mortgage backed securities plus Treasuries and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds -- it’s sitting on a stash worth $2 trillion. Acquired to keep downward pressure on mortgage rates as the housing market was tanking and credit was tightening, the Fed now faces the dilemma of how to extricate itself from the holdings, without pushing rates higher.
Treasury and the Federal Reserve also continue to shovel money into AIG -- $132 billion so far, with an additional $50 billion possible. The beleaguered insurance giant plans to sell stock and peddle its foreign insurance arms to raise $100 billion toward repaying Uncle Sam, and eventually Treasury may recover something on the toxic loans it swept from AIG. But odds are taxpayers will wind up swallowing about $30 billion of the debt.
By early next year, Treasury will start to recoup its investment in General Motors (GM) as the car company, which is now 60% taxpayer owned, initiates a series of public stock offerings, now that the Detroit automaker is headed back into the black. Although it’s likely to take a few years, Washington is likely to recapture essentially all of the $43 billion it sank into a bankrupt GM.
The outlook for Chrysler paying back the $12 billion Uncle Sam gave it, in exchange for a 10% stake in the company, is iffier. Though the firm may be marginally profitable this year, policymakers in Washington know that putting off an initial public offering (IPO) for a few years will yield a better price for its shares. Italy’s Fiat car company, which now owns 20% of the company, could also buy up to an additional 15% from the U.S. Treasury, though given the potential for at least the appearance of close-dealing, it seems more likely that Uncle Sam will wait to get his money out through an IPO.
Finally, small and midsize banks still owe Washington over $60 billion, about a fourth of the $250 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) loans. The country’s big banks have repaid all of their loans. Most of the remaining balance will eventually be repaid as well. Meanwhile, taxpayers are actually earning some income from the program. Assets acquired by the Treasury Department under TARP have so far brought in about $21 billion in fees, dividends and profits from sales.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

-
Americans, Even With Higher Incomes, Are Feeling the SqueezeA 50-year mortgage probably isn’t the answer, but there are other ways to alleviate the continuing sting of high prices
-
Hiding the Truth From Your Financial Adviser Can Cost YouHiding assets or debt from a financial adviser damages the relationship as well as your finances. If you're not being fully transparent, it's time to ask why.
-
How to Manage a Disagreement With Your Financial AdviserKnowing how to deal with a disagreement can improve both your finances and your relationship with your planner.
-
How AI Chatbots Can Secretly Give Biased AdviceThe Kiplinger Letter “Poisoned” artificial intelligence can give untrustworthy advice about finance, health and lots more. Here’s how to fend off the growing threat.
-
Farmers Brace for Another Rough YearThe Kiplinger Letter The agriculture sector has been plagued by low commodity prices and is facing an uncertain trade outlook.
-
AI Sparks Existential Crisis for Software StocksThe Kiplinger Letter Fears that SaaS subscription software could be rendered obsolete by artificial intelligence make investors jittery.
-
A Scary Emerging AI ThreatThe Kiplinger Letter An emerging public health issue caused by artificial intelligence poses a new national security threat. Expect AI-induced psychosis to gain far more attention.
-
An Inflection Point for the Entertainment IndustryThe Kiplinger Letter The entertainment industry is shifting as movie and TV companies face fierce competition, fight for attention and cope with artificial intelligence.
-
Humanoid Robots Are About to be Put to the TestThe Kiplinger Letter Robot makers are in a full-on sprint to take over factories, warehouses and homes, but lofty visions of rapid adoption are outpacing the technology’s reality.
-
Trump Reshapes Foreign PolicyThe Kiplinger Letter The President starts the new year by putting allies and adversaries on notice.
-
Congress Set for Busy WinterThe Kiplinger Letter The Letter editors review the bills Congress will decide on this year. The government funding bill is paramount, but other issues vie for lawmakers’ attention.