Two Consequential Tax Cases You May Not Have Heard About
The Supreme Court's decisions in these cases create uncertainty about challenging IRS regulations and guidance. Expect more litigation to follow.


Two of the most consequential Supreme Court cases affecting income tax planning did not directly involve income tax issues and did not even include the word “tax” in the opinion. Nevertheless, these cases substantially affect the enforceability of IRS regulations and guidance. The full effect of these decisions will almost certainly require additional litigation in the years to come.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (Docket No. 22-451) was issued by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 28, 2024. Since 1984, courts were required to give deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. That rule was established in Chevron USA, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984) (467 U.S. 877). Loper overruled the long-standing rule providing judicial deference to agency (including the IRS) interpretations of ambiguous statutes. This deference in simple terms created an “uphill battle” to challenge IRS regulations.
The Supreme Court determined that the rule established by Chevron did not comply with the Administrative Procedure Act. The Supreme Court even looked back to 1803 and held that the Chevron rule of deference violated the landmark holding of the Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803) (5 U.S. 137), which held that the court decides legal questions by using its own judgment. The net result for tax cases is that the court now decides the best interpretation of a contested statute and not the IRS.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
A much different standard
Prior to Loper, the court would determine whether the IRS interpretation was permissible — a much different standard for a taxpayer challenging the IRS interpretation.
Loper recognizes that judicial deference may be appropriate if the statute itself provides that the IRS is to issue regulations or guidance. Even in that case, Loper provides that the courts still have independent authority to police the outer boundaries of the regulations and to ensure that the IRS exercises its discretion in a manner consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act.
Right after Loper, on July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court issued Corner Post, Inc. v. Federal Reserve (Docket No. 22-1008). Corner Post provides that the six-year statute of limitations in 28 USC Section 2401 began to run when the plaintiffs actually suffered an injury rather than from when the rule, regulation or statute became final.
The Anti-Injunction Act (AIA) prevents pre-enforcement of judicial review. If the statute of limitations begins with the date of enactment of the regulation, then the six-year statute under Section 2401 of the AIA would run before the plaintiff, or anyone, could satisfy the requirements for a challenge. The effect of Loper is that a newly created entity would appear to be able to challenge a long-standing regulation that was otherwise believed to be final and not subject to challenge. In the past, the government used Section 2401 of the AIA to prevent judicial challenges to regulations.
Expect more litigation
We can expect to see more litigation due to the uncertainty created by Loper and Corner Post. Taxpayers may now be able to challenge regulations finalized 10 or 20 years ago and otherwise believed to be immune from such challenges. Courts no longer must give deference to the IRS' interpretation of regulations. Taxpayers can now more easily argue for meanings different than those asserted by the IRS.
We can be certain that we have interesting times ahead.
Taxpayers with positions well-reasoned and founded on case law or other authority may now be more willing to pursue positions contrary to IRS regulations. When challenged, the court can more easily accept a contrary position. This is true even for regulations that have been in place for many years.
Related Content
- Supreme Court Strikes Down Chevron: What It Means for the IRS
- How Four Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impact Your Money
- Murdochs' Dispute Highlights Benefits of Trusts in Nevada
- Nine Lessons to Be Learned From the Hilton Family Trust Contest
- What We Can Learn from Tony Bennett's Estate Dispute
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Founder of The Goralka Law Firm, John M. Goralka assists business owners, real estate owners and successful families to achieve their enlightened dreams by better protecting their assets, minimizing income and estate tax and resolving messes and transitions to preserve, protect and enhance their legacy. John is one of few California attorneys certified as a Specialist by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization in both Taxation and Estate Planning, Trust and Probate. You can read more of John's articles on the Kiplinger Advisor Collective.
-
Stocks Can't Hold Meta, Microsoft Gains: Stock Market Today
The main indexes all opened higher Thursday on impressive Big Tech earnings, but momentum faded into the close.
-
Retirement Health Care Costs Are On the Rise: What You Need to Know
A 65-year-old retiree will face significantly higher lifetime health care costs than they would have a year ago, even with Medicare. Here are the surprising totals.
-
Stocks Can't Hold Meta, Microsoft Gains: Stock Market Today
The main indexes all opened higher Thursday on impressive Big Tech earnings, but momentum faded into the close.
-
Three Ways to Find Deals in Your Investments This Year
Looking for ways to save because of tariffs? Don't forget to look for deals in your investments. Here are three expert tips for making a little extra this year.
-
How to Invest for a Fall Interest Rate Cut by the Fed
A lot can happen between now and then, but the probability the Fed cuts interest rates before the end of the year is better than 85%.
-
You Don't Have to Be Wealthy to Need a Wealth Manager
Navigating complex financial decisions is hard on your own, no matter how much money you have. A wealth manager can provide comprehensive financial planning, investment management, risk management and more.
-
Despite Tariffs, These Investment Experts Are Bullish on European Equities
European equities were one of the better-performing investments during the first half of 2025. They could be a good long-term prospect for U.S. investors needing to diversify, according to these investment managers.
-
Stocks Are Up and Down on Fed Day: Stock Market Today
In another sign of changing times, JPMorgan has partnered with Coinbase to enable cryptocurrency purchases with credit cards.
-
What Federal Interest Rates Mean for Your Grocery Bill
The relationship between grocery prices and the Federal Reserve has plenty of back-and-forth. Understand how they interplay.
-
5 Undervalued Stocks to Buy Now
There are plenty of high-quality undervalued stocks to buy right now, you just need to know where to look. Here, we highlight five of our top picks.