There’s a quote from an old Morgan Stanley ad that gets passed around a lot at tax time: “You must pay taxes, but there’s no law that says you gotta leave a tip.”
Savers, especially, should pay heed to this advice.
Taxes already take a chunk of your earnings — the more you make, the more you pay (in most cases). But that burden can be even heavier for those who save and invest.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
For example, if you have investments such as mutual funds that aren’t in an IRA/Roth IRA and are generating annual income, that money, in most situations, is 100% taxable. If you didn’t know that, and were surprised when a 1099-DIV showed up in the mail, you may have some re-evaluating to do.
How much of a difference can a tax-efficient portfolio make?
Let’s say there’s a 20-year-old with $100 received from a mutual fund dividend, and he pays 30% (25% federal and 5% state) in taxes. He’s left with just $70.
Next, let’s look at his twin brother’s account. He has assets in the same amount, but it’s been structured in a way so that 50% isn’t taxable. He’s paying $15 in taxes — 30% of $50 — and ends up keeping $85 instead of $70.
For a younger person, that tax savings is important because of the compounding interest; if you’re keeping more, you’re likely investing more, and you’re probably earning more.
Even if these brothers got the exact same rate of return on the exact same dollar amount, the one with the tax-efficient portfolio is going to likely end up with more money in retirement.
Now, let’s go bigger — and older.
Recently, we had a woman come in with a $1.5 million portfolio — all stocks, bonds and mutual funds, no municipal bonds or any tax-advantaged vehicles. All of the money was non-qualified (or non-retirement), and therefore all of the income being created was taxable. Her adviser told her that when she reaches retirement, her portfolio will provide $40,000 in income each year.
But that isn’t a complete picture. I ran the numbers and showed her: With that $40,000 in income, and paying 30% in taxes ($12,000), she’ll really be living on only $28,000.
If she had a 50% tax-efficient portfolio, she’d keep $34,000 instead of that $28,000. Which one would you rather be living on?
Unfortunately, this seems to be the message a majority of the population doesn’t hear. Instead, much of their focus goes to rate of return or that big number at the bottom of those quarterly statements.
But even if the rate of return on your mutual fund is 7% or more, you’re not getting all of that. That’s not the net. And if that big dollar amount is bumping you into a higher tax bracket, you’re not keeping as much as you could.
In the end, it isn’t about how much you make, it’s about how much you keep.
Your financial adviser can help you find tax-wise ways to help shield your assets and still use income-producing assets such as municipal bonds, interval funds, alternative investments, IRAs, real estate and other strategies. Get an analysis of your portfolio to help ensure the money you’ve put away to build a better future doesn’t end up costing you at tax time.
Kim Franke-Folstad contributed to this article.
The article and opinions in this publication are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. Please consult with your tax and/or legal adviser for such guidance.
Examples are for illustrative purposes only and may not be indicative of your situation. Your results will vary.
Securities offered only by duly registered individuals through Madison Avenue Securities, LLC (MAS), Member FINRA & SIPC. Advisory services offered only by duly registered individuals through Brighter Financial Capital Management, LLC, a SEC Investment Advisor. Insurance products and services are offered through Clark & Associates, Inc. Financial Solutions, an affiliated company. Brighter Financial Capital Management, LLC and MAS are separate entities, independently owned.
The appearances in Kiplinger were obtained through a PR program. The columnist received assistance from a public relations firm in preparing this piece for submission to Kiplinger.com. Kiplinger was not compensated in any way.
Related Content
-
Ask the Editor, October 17: QCDs and Tax-PlanningAsk the Editor In this week's Ask the Editor Q&A, Joy Taylor answers more questions about the use of qualified charitable distributions (QCDs) in end-of-year tax planning.
-
You May Want To Think Twice Before Selling These Four Assets in RetirementSitting on little gold mines? It's natural to want to cash out when you retire. Here’s why you may not want to.
-
Treat Home Equity Like Other Investments in Your Retirement Plan: Look at Its Track RecordHomeowners who are considering using home equity in their retirement plan can analyze it like they do their other investments. Here's how.
-
Why Does It Take Insurers So Darn Long to Pay Claims? An Insurance Expert ExplainsThe process of verification, investigation and cost assessment after a loss is complex and goes beyond simply cutting a check.
-
Two Reasons to Consider Deferred Compensation in the Wake of the OBBB, From a Financial PlannerDeferred compensation plans let you potentially lower your current taxes and help to keep you out of a higher tax bracket. It's important to consider the risks.
-
Financial Fact vs Fiction: The Truth About Social Security Entitlement (and Reverse Mortgages' Bad Rap)Despite the 'entitlement' moniker, Social Security and Medicare are both benefits that workers earn. And reverse mortgages can be a strategic tool for certain people. Plus, we're setting the record straight on three other myths.
-
The End of 2%? An Investment Adviser's Case for Why the Fed Should Raise Its Inflation TargetYes, inflation can be tough on those living on fixed incomes, but protecting us from it too strictly could do our overall economy more harm than good.
-
Medicare Open Enrollment: Why You Need to Pay Extra Attention to Part D, From a Financial AdviserThe lowest premium for prescription drug coverage might not actually save you the most money. Make sure you take copays into consideration and do the math.
-
How the One Big Beautiful Bill Will Change Charitable GivingTaxpayers who don't itemize will be able to take a bigger deduction for donations, which could boost giving. However, high-income donors could see their tax benefits reduced.
-
A 'Fast, Fair and Friendly' Fail: Farmers Irks Customers With Its Handling of a Data BreachFarmers Insurance is facing negative attention and lawsuits because of a three-month delay in notifying 1.1 million policyholders about a data breach. Here's what you can do if you're affected.
