What's the IRA Mistake Almost All Retirees Make?
Picking funds and diversifying your portfolio isn't enough. You have to have a plan on dealing with taxes, too. You need to diversify your investments based on their different tax treatments.

Good financial advisers and smart investing DIYers have something in common when it comes to building a portfolio.
They both put a high priority on risk tolerance and how it applies to asset allocation.
After all, a diversified blend of stocks, bonds and cash is the well-established path to reaching your retirement goals. It helps you grow and protect your nest egg and retire with the money you need … right?

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Well, yes. But if that’s your only focus, you’re likely neglecting another crucial piece of long-term portfolio planning: tax efficiency.
I see people, even some financial professionals, make this mistake all the time. They determine risk tolerance — often with an in-depth risk assessment tool — then go for a stock-bond mix based on the suggested asset allocation.
And that’s it. They’re investing and growing their money as comfortably, and safely, as possible. Or so they think.
Unfortunately, they haven’t put much thought into how those investments will be taxed when they retire and start drawing income from their savings. All too often they’ve created a tax trap inside their tax-deferred IRA.
That’s bad enough, but when I see an investor whose portfolio includes taxable and tax-deferred accounts that mirror each other exactly, it really makes me scratch my head. When it’s a retiree with a large nest egg or a high income-tax rate, I just want to jump in and fix it.
The problem? That investor is growing her IRA and, therefore, her required minimum distributions (RMDs). Those mandatory withdrawals, which begin at age 70½ whether you want them or not, will be taxed as ordinary income — the highest tax rate.
But she doesn’t have to do it that way if she also has a taxable account, which doesn’t have RMDs and offers other advantages for handling the growth in her portfolio, including tax harvesting possibilities and profits that are taxed at the lower capital gains rates, instead of as ordinary income.
Here’s a hypothetical: Let’s say our investor, Sandy, is 70½ years old and has $500,000 in her IRA and $500,000 in a taxable brokerage account. For the next 20 years, she plans to take only her RMDs and let the rest of her investment savings compound. She wants her money to grow, but not by putting it at too much risk, so she fills out a risk assessment questionnaire that tells her to use a 50%-50% blend of stocks and bonds.
Sounds pretty simple. Except that Sandy puts the exact same blend of investments in both her IRA and brokerage accounts. That could cost her thousands of dollars, thanks to the effect taxes will have on her returns (not to mention the likelihood of duplicate management fees).
Sandy was off to the right start worrying about risk and determining which specific stocks, bonds and other investments best met her portfolio needs. But she (or her adviser) should have taken it a step further by looking at those investments and assigning them to either her IRA or brokerage account based on how they’re taxed.
Her strategy could have been to place her more conservative investments (those with lower expected returns) in her tax-deferred IRA and her more aggressive (higher-earning) assets in her taxable brokerage account or a Roth IRA. Each account still would have been working hard for her but in very different ways. The conservative funds in her IRA would fill her need for safety, and as they grow more slowly, the higher tax rate wouldn’t take as big of a bite. Meanwhile, the more aggressive funds in her taxable brokerage account would grow more quickly, but be taxed at a lower rate.
If, like Sandy, you have the same or a similar blend of investments in your accounts, it’s probably going to cost you. But if you coordinate your accounts instead, you can cut your tax liability considerably.
I believe managing taxes in retirement (and pre-retirement) is just as important to financial success as choosing the right investments. If you don’t have the time or inclination to research the tax consequences of your investments yourself, find a trustworthy CPA or financial adviser to help you out.
You’ve worked hard to build your nest egg. Don’t lose that money to a mistake.
Kim Franke-Folstad contributed to this article.
Investment advisory services offered only by duly registered individuals through AE Wealth Management, LLC (AEWM). AEWM and RightBridge Financial Group are not affiliated companies. Investing involves risk including the potential loss of principal. Any references to protection benefits or lifetime income, etc. generally refer to fixed insurance products, never securities or investment products. Insurance and annuity product guarantees are backed by the financial strength and claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company. AW06172999
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Keith Gebert, a Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor, is the founder and CEO of RightBridge Financial Group. He has passed the Series 65 Securities exam and holds life, health and annuity insurance licenses.
-
Is Delta's New AI Pricing Bad News for Your Wallet?
Delta is using AI to "personalize" the price you pay for airfare. Here's what that could mean for your next trip.
-
The 10 Places Where Social Security Covers the Most (and Least) Of Your Expenses
On average, Social Security covers 30.11% of retirees’ spending. Fortunately, there are places where those dollars will stretch further and cover more of your spending.
-
How Divorced Retirees Can Maximize Their Social Security Benefits: A Case Study
Susan discovered several years after she filed for Social Security that she is eligible to receive benefits based on her ex-spouse's earnings record. This case study explains how her new benefits are calculated and what her steps are to claim some of the money she missed.
-
I'm an Investment Pro: Here's How Alternatives Could Inject Stability and Growth Into Your Portfolio
Alternative investments can often avoid the impact of volatility, counterbalancing the ups and downs of stocks and bonds during times of market stress.
-
An Investment Strategist Takes a Practical Look at Alternative Investments
Alternatives can play an important role in a portfolio by offering different exposures and goals, but investors should carefully consider their complexity, costs, taxes and liquidity. Here's an alts primer.
-
Ready to Retire? Your Five-Year Business Exit Strategy
If you're a business owner looking to sell and retire, it can take years to complete the process. Use this five-year timeline to prepare and stay on track.
-
A Financial Planner's Prescription for the Headache of Multiple Retirement Accounts
Having a bunch of retirement accounts can cause unnecessary complications. Consolidation can make it easier to manage your savings and potentially improve investment outcomes.
-
Overpaying for Financial Advice? A Financial Planner's Guide to Fees
Take five minutes to review how much you're paying for financial advice. If you're overpaying, you could be better off with an adviser who charges a flat fee.
-
The Big Red Bucket Theory: A Financial Adviser's Simple Way to Visualize Your Retirement Plan
When you think about retirement, picture a big red bucket brimming with all the money you've saved. It's everything you've got, and it has to last you.
-
A Guide to Personalizing Your Retirement Plan for Maximum Impact
This strategy challenges conventional retirement rules of thumb by combining traditional savings, home equity and annuities to provide higher income and liquid savings and help cover long-term care costs.