America Online stock, which went public in 1992, made many early investors rich. Shares soared more than 10,000% over the next seven years as the company introduced millions of people to the Internet. But AOL, as it is now known, is unlikely to do the same for current investors. In fact, we think AOL faces a daunting future in its return as an independent company.
With its spinoff from Time Warner completed, the new AOL (symbol AOL) began trading for the first time as an independent entity on December 10. The stock, which had been trading on the New York Stock Exchange on a “when-issued” basis since November, opened at $23.39, then remained fairly flat for the rest of the day. It closed at $23.52 on light volume.
AOL must replace a dying dial-up Internet-access business, which accounts for nearly half its revenues, by drawing bigger crowds to its stable of advertising-supported Web sites. But given intense competition among online media firms and how easy it is for new entrants to compete, we don’t think that will be enough to produce significant returns for shareholders.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
As of September 30, 2009, AOL had 5.4 million dial-up customers, down from 6.9 million at the beginning of the year. During those nine months, dial-up revenue was $1.1 billion (out of $2.4 billion in total revenue). That’s down only 28% from the same period a year earlier.
But merely replacing dial-up revenue with advertising won’t keep the company level. The dial-up business requires little new investment, so the profit margins are higher than in advertising. In addition, dial-up customers are a reliable and critical source of traffic for AOL’s advertisers. As these people migrate to faster Internet service at cable and phone companies, AOL will need to “increase the number and engagement of other consumers on AOL media,” the company says in a regulatory filing. In other words, as millions of people switch to Comcast, Verizon and anyone else, AOL has to find replacements willing to pay for more services.
That won’t happen in the short term. For one thing, advertising revenues are declining as well, down 19% over the first nine months of 2009 . But even if advertising were growing enough to offset declining dial-up revenue, it would still “likely result in declines in operating income and cash flows for the foreseeable future,” the company admits.
Moreover, chief executive Tim Armstrong, a former advertising chief at Google, is firing one-third of the company to save money while simultaneously trying to beef up media and service offerings. It’s hard to see how AOL can gain a competitive edge while walking that tightrope.
Granted, the company does have more than its famous name. It owns a number of popular entertainment, news and lifestyle Web sites, as well as local entertainment guides and directories and consumer services such as AOL Music, Moviefone and MapQuest. Its e-mail and instant-messaging services are also widely used. But AOL doesn’t dominate any of these areas in the way that Google rules searches (and maps) or Facebook and MySpace reign over the social-networking universe.
AOL does have a few things going for it. As a recognized brand, its sites draw 108 million visitors, fourth-best among U.S. Internet properties, according to research firm comScore Media Metrix.
In addition, AOL has emerged from the Time Warner entanglement—their combination in 2001 is considered one of the most-disastrous mergers ever-- with no debt. And, by reasonable yardsticks, the shares look cheap. Analysts expect AOL to produce operating income of around $1 billion this year. At a price of $23.52, it has a market value of $2.53 billion, or about three times cash flow.
Yahoo and InterActiveCorp, two firms with Internet advertising-based businesses, trade at 13 and ten times cash flow, respectively. On the other hand, dial-up Internet service providers EarthLink and United Online trade at two and four times cash flow, respectively. The right multiple for AOL, with its blend of dial-up and advertising, should probably fall somewhere in between. That would imply the stock can go up as long as AOL’s revenues don’t utterly collapse.
Given widespread skepticism about AOL’s prospects, some early successes as an independent firm might produce short-term trading profits for early investors. But for the long term, it’s hard to justify risking money on a company with shrinking profits, enormously strong competitors, and so many uncertainties in its turnaround plan.
-
Original Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Quiz: Which is Right for You?Quiz Take this quick quiz to discover your "Medicare Personality Type" and learn whether you are a Traditionalist, or a Bundler.
-
Ask the Editor: Capital Gains and Tax PlanningAsk the Editor In this week's Ask the Editor Q&A, Joy Taylor answers questions on capital gains tax rates and end-of-year tax planning
-
Time Is Running Out to Make the Best Tax Moves for 2025Don't wait until January — investors, including those with a high net worth, can snag big tax savings for 2025 (and 2026) with these strategies.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Coca-Cola Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayEven with its reliable dividend growth and generous stock buybacks, Coca-Cola has underperformed the broad market in the long term.
-
If You Put $1,000 into Qualcomm Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You Would Have TodayQualcomm stock has been a big disappointment for truly long-term investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Home Depot Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayHome Depot stock has been a buy-and-hold banger for truly long-term investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Bank of America Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBank of America stock has been a massive buy-and-hold bust.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Oracle Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayORCL Oracle stock has been an outstanding buy-and-hold bet for decades.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Sherwin-Williams Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodaySherwin-Williams stock has clobbered the broader market by a wide margin for a long time.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UnitedHealth Group Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUNH stock was a massive market beater for ages — until it wasn't.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Berkshire Hathaway Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBerkshire Hathaway is a long-time market beater, but the easy money in BRK.B has already been made.
