Stop the presses! Someone says something nice about a newspaper stock. Yep. It's true. Deutsche Securities upgraded the shares of Lee Enterprises (symbol LEE) on January 17, and the stock responded with a 5.5% gain, to $31.90. That's a big splash for a group of stocks that seem to have been bleeding red since the millennium. Such storied news chains as Gannett, McClatchy and Tribune have either imploded or sagged so long that only a masochist or a rock-ribbed contrarian would invest in them now and expect much appreciation. Tribune's inability to find a buyer willing to pay much of a price summarizes big money's disdain for newspaper investments.
But smaller, under-the-radar companies may be better bets, particularly if they can demonstrate rising circulation in suburbs and faster-growing small cities. There's also the promise of online ad riches. Lee, which is based in Iowa and owns 58 dailies in 23 states and a slew of weeklies, recently reported that its online ad revenue is growing more than 50% annually, compared with an industry average of 25%. The Web brings Lee just 5.5% of its ad income now, but the trajectory is impressive. Continued growth of Internet ad sales would mitigate much of the decline in classified revenues.
Moreover, circulation is up at most of Lee's daily papers, including, improbably, its largest property, the St. Louis Post Dispatch. St. Louisans are avid newspaper readers and baseball fans. Advertising and newspaper sales bumped up last year as the Cardinals unexpectedly won the World Series.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Getting back to the stock, Lee shares sell at about 20 times earnings, which is expensive for a company in a troubled sector. But Lee produces healthy free cash flow (earnings plus non-cash charges, minus the capital expenditures needed to maintain the business), pays a good dividend (the stock yields 2.5%), and is working down the long-term debt it assumed to buy the Post-Dispatch and the Arizona Daily Star in 2005.
Lee is still old media, but if you're game for an overlooked stock in a sector that's out of favor, it's a name worth considering.
-
Four Surprising Signs You’ll Never Retire (and How to Fix Them)Gearing up to retire? If any of these four signs ring true, you may want to make some changes before you do.
-
Stocks Rise After Trump-Powell Fed Tour: Stock Market TodayNvidia hit a new all-time high intraday, but another renowned semiconductor name and some less iconic stocks were bigger movers Friday.
-
Are Buffett and Berkshire About to Bail on Kraft Heinz Stock?Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway own a lot of Kraft Heinz stock, so what happens when they decide to sell KHC?
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First 6 Months of Trump's Second TermSix months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Berkshire Hathaway Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBerkshire Hathaway is a long-time market beater, but the easy money in BRK.B has already been made.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Procter & Gamble Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayProcter & Gamble stock is a dependable dividend grower, but a disappointing long-term holding.
-
My Three-Day Rule for Investing: And If it Applies NowStock Market I've seen a lot in my career. Here's what I see now in the stock market.
-
Is It Time to Invest in Europe?Stock Market Europe is being shaken out of its lethargy, militarily and otherwise, by Donald Trump's changes in U.S. policy. Should investors start buying?
-
Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged: What the Experts Are SayingFederal Reserve As widely expected, the Federal Open Market Committee took a 'wait-and-see' approach toward borrowing costs.
-
Fed Sees Fewer Rate Cuts in 2025: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve cut interest rates as expected, but the future path of borrowing costs became more opaque.
