Annuities
Lock In Your Retirement Income
Three strategies that use annuities to guarantee monthly paychecks for life.
By Kimberly Lankford, Contributing Editor
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, May 2010
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
As rumors spread that President Obama might utter the word annuity during his State of the Union address earlier this year, the insurance industry went wild. Salespeople touted the president's impending seal of approval as a reason to buy their wares -- even if the high-fee, complex versions they were promoting only vaguely resembled the products that the president supports.
Although Obama never actually mentioned the A-word in his speech, his Middle Class Task Force later recommended annuities as a good way to reduce "the risks that retirees will outlive their savings or that the retirees' living standards will be eroded by investment losses or inflation."
The need for lifetime income is huge and growing as life expectancies continue to increase and traditional sources of guaranteed income disappear. For a 65-year-old couple, there's a 25% chance that one spouse will live until age 97, yet fewer people are retiring with pensions, and Social Security covers only a small portion of most people's expenses. Many retirees who had planned to fill the income gap with their savings are wondering where to turn after suffering through two severe market downturns over the past decade. An annuity may be the answer, but not all annuities are alike, and some may not be appropriate for you.
Plain and simple
An immediate annuity is based on a simple concept: You give an insurance company a lump sum and it promises to send you a monthly check for the rest of your life -- no matter how long you live. For example, a 65-year-old man who invests $100,000 in an immediate annuity today could collect $8,112 per year for the rest of his life. That's about twice as much as he could safely withdraw from his savings each year if he followed the widely accepted recommendation to limit initial withdrawals to 4% of your portfolio to avoid outliving your savings.
Part of the reason for the bigger annuity payout is that each distribution consists of interest as well as a return of principal. But the real secret behind the beefed-up annuity checks is that you pool your risk with other policyholders. People who die early end up subsidizing the payments of people who live longer. You get the biggest bang for your buck if you buy a "straight life" annuity, which pays out only for your lifetime, with no survivor benefits. But most married couples prefer to buy annuities that pay out as long as either spouse lives, even though it means smaller benefits. For example, a 65-year-old couple who invest $100,000 in an immediate annuity and choose dual coverage would receive an annual payout of $6,634.
Buying an immediate annuity helped Elaine Leaf stretch her retirement income. Ten years ago, Leaf, now 63, retired from a career in radio and moved from New Jersey to Edgewater, Fla. "I thought I could live on the funds from the sale of my house," she says. But she soon discovered she was wrong. Medical-insurance premiums alone cost $1,000 a month, and her investments took a major hit during the 2000-02 bear market.
Leaf took a job as a cashier at a discount clothing store to earn some extra money and qualify for health insurance -- but she was miserable. Her financial adviser recommended that she buy an immediate annuity from New York Life. She invested about $375,000 and now receives $2,500 per month -- twice as much as she was able to withdraw safely from her savings. (Because interest rates were higher four years ago, Leaf locked in a bigger payout than a 59-year-old could buy today.) "I feel protected for life," says Leaf. "Now I can count on a check that comes every month like clockwork."
How to shop
When deciding how much to invest in an immediate annuity, follow Leaf's lead: Add up your monthly expenses, subtract any guaranteed sources of income (such as Social Security and pension benefits) and buy an annuity to fill the gap. But watch out. Payouts can vary enormously by company, so it's a good idea to compare prices from many insurers. "There's easily a 10% to 15% spread from the top to the bottom of the list," says Hersh Stern, publisher of AnnuityShopper.com. Stern's Web site (www.immediateannuities.com) includes a database of more than a dozen annuity companies, making it easy to compare benefits.
One risk of immediate annuities, however, is that your fixed monthly check will lose purchasing power over time, so it's important not to tie up all your cash at once. Interest rates and your age at the time of purchase also affect the size of your monthly check. Because current interest rates are so low, you may want to ladder annuities, meaning you invest some money in an immediate annuity now and buy another one later when interest rates may be higher. Plus, you'll get a bigger payout because you'll be older and have a shorter life expectancy.
Another option is to buy an immediate annuity with inflation protection. Chris O'Flinn, of Elm Income Group (www.elmannuity.com), in Washington, D.C., recommends buying an annuity with annual payout increases linked to the consumer price index. Although the initial payouts are about 25% to 30% less than you would get by investing the same amount in a fixed annuity, you'll preserve your buying power. "When inflation comes, it tends to gallop in and stay around for quite a while," says O'Flinn.
Hedge your bets
Another way to deal with rising expenses is through a deferred variable annuity. (Despite the shared "annuity" label, the similarities end there.) Deferred variable annuities are complex products that try to do a lot at once. You invest in mutual fund-like accounts that can grow through time, and they give you a minimum guarantee in case the investments lose money. They're most attractive to preretirees in their fifties or sixties who want to capture stock-market gains during their final decade of work without exposing their nest egg to investment losses.
James Rogers, a financial planner in Exton, Pa., had avoided recommending deferred annuities for years, mainly because the distributions are taxed at ordinary income-tax rates rather than lower capital-gains rates reserved for most other investments. But Rogers took a second look when insurers started offering generous guarantees. "I found they really had some appeal to clients who have lived through two serious bear markets in the past ten years and have seen significant volatility in their portfolios," Rogers says. Clients who bought a deferred annuity with guaranteed benefits gained the confidence to remain invested in the stock market rather than stash their money in safe but low-return investments.

Rogers uses an annuity from Sun Life Financial that guarantees to increase the initial investment by 7% per year for up to ten years and then allows annuity holders who are 65 to 79 years old to withdraw up to 5% per year from that guaranteed base amount (or from the actual investment-account balance, if it is higher) for life. If you invest $100,000, for example, it would be worth $170,000 after ten years, at which point you could start withdrawing $8,500 per year. The company can afford to increase the guaranteed base by 7% for ten years, net of fees, because you can't take that cash in a lump sum. You can access only a small portion of that guaranteed amount every year, and the insurer is betting that it can earn more in the long run. You can withdraw only 4% of the guarantee every year if you start taking withdrawals when you are younger than 65, or 6% if you start when you are 80 or older.
In addition to offering investors both guaranteed income and a chance to let their account balances grow, deferred annuities are more flexible than immediate annuities, which generally require you to lock up your investment for life. You can cash out of a deferred annuity at any time, although you'll generally pay a hefty surrender charge if you do it in the first seven years or so. Cashing out an annuity would make sense only if your investments performed well and your actual account value was worth more than the guaranteed amount.
Unfortunately, annuities with guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits aren't as good a deal as they were even a few years ago. After ratings agencies expressed concerns over insurers' ability to make good on their promises, many companies scaled back their guarantees and increased fees for new policyholders. When you add up the total cost of insurance, underlying investments and added guarantees, most deferred annuities cost between 2.5% and 3% per year of your initial investment amount. Many insurers also curtailed the investment options and now require you to invest a portion of your portfolio in a balanced fund rather than keeping all of it in stock funds. That minimizes their risk -- and limits your potential gain.
An alternative strategy
Mark Cortazzo, a financial adviser in Parsippany, N.J., has devised an alternative strategy to replicate the growth and income benefits of an annuity at a much lower cost. His clients invest some money in longevity insurance and the rest in a portfolio that he manages of low-cost exchange-traded funds.
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy



Reader Comments (11)
Posted by: Nomen at 04/12/2010 04:43:54 PM
"For a 65-year-old couple, there's a 25% chance that one spouse will live until age 97..." Let's see, that's one chance in four that one of two people will live that long. Is that one chance in eight?? I don't think so. Every time I go to an annuity seminar those projected lifespans get more exaggerated. It was 92 then 95 and now I read 97. I guarantee that if you scan the obits every day you won't see nearly that many 97 or over. As obese as most of us are, we''ll be lucky to see 85. Until then I will handle my own money instead of buying an annuity where they are counting on the odds of 7 out of 8 or worse that I won't make it. If I do live to be 97 and run out of money, I REALLY WON'T CARE!!!
Posted by: Linc at 04/14/2010 05:23:40 PM
And what happens when the insurance company (think AIG, Madoff, Enron, WorldComm, FNMA, any firm on Wall Street, etc. etc.) that took your $277,000 goes belly up -- then what do you do? Ask the crooks on the Board of Directors and senior management team to return the bonuses they received as a reward for driving the company into the ground? I'm just certain they would willingly return all their ridiculously inflated compensation in order to make all the poor suckers that bought their so-called "insurance policies" (aka "scam", "ponzi scheme", "fraud") whole again.
Posted by: James at 04/14/2010 05:39:46 PM
@Nomen: Yes, the statistic is *For a couple that is already 65* there is about 1/8 chance that one of them will live 32 years (or until 97). I agree, an average life expectancy is still around 77. However, for people that have lived to 65, their average life expectancy is more like 85, and they have just over a 10% chance of living to 97. From experience (with an elderly relative), you probably will worry very much about running out of money in your old age. Once you hit about 70 it's basically impossible to work, so you're entirely dependent on Social Security, any money you've saved, and the generosity of others. Once your money starts dwindling, panic sets in.
Posted by: Ron at 04/15/2010 08:00:36 AM
I have seen several articles about these single payment annuities from Kiplinger and I usually see comments like Linc's which question: what if the insurance company goes belly up? Is there any protection or recourse? If Kiplinger has responded to this, please refer me to the article(s), if not then please post an article addressing these concerns. Thanks.
Posted by: Jack at 04/15/2010 11:34:55 AM
You make reference to the rule of withdrawing 4% of your portfolio in retirement. I've never understood if that includes interest and dividends. In other words, If my portfolio is $500,000 -- 4% is $20,000. But if that portfolio is also earning $10,000 a year in dividends/interest/cap gains distributions, does the rule let me spend $30,000? Or does the rule assume I'm reinvesting the money and I have to stick to $20,000.
Posted by: Jeff at 04/15/2010 11:43:00 AM
It is correct that is one reaches age 65, then for a female the average expectancy is above 85 and few years less than for men. Asume that they reach that age and recieve the $50 k\year and one lives to age 87, then there will be a 350000 payout, much less than if one conservatively invests this sum at age 65. $50k sounds like a lot now but in 15 years the value may be much lower especially if inflation increases.
Posted by: Kim Lankford at 04/15/2010 05:01:00 PM
Ron and Linc, this is Kim Lankford, the author of the article. That is a very important point about the financial strength of the annuity company. I wrote an article addressing that issue in November 2008, soon after the announcement of AIG's financial troubles, explaining the risks and protections. A key point is to know the annuity coverage limits for your state guaranty association -- you may want to split a very large annuity purchase over several insuers so you can increase the protection if your insurer does become insolvent. The article is called "Is Yur Annuity Safe?" and you can find it at www.kiplinger.com/features/archives/2009/01/krr_is_your_annuity_safe.html. I hope this information helps.
Posted by: The Ryan at 04/16/2010 11:34:48 AM
Are the annuities described here a smart investment for folks in their 30s? Example - if I start now, does that mean my principal investment would be lower than if I started in my 50s?
Posted by: Joe8881 at 04/18/2010 12:16:34 PM
Kimberly, Good article on Immediate Income Annuities. Let me add more to it...The majority of retirees for the last 15 years that have purchased Immediate Income Annuities are very, very happy with them. It is best to shop around for the Highest Immediate Income Annuity Payout... You can do that with one service and making only one request... What is an Immediate Income Annuity?... It is an exchange of a Lump-sum of money for a Monthly Income Stream guaranteed for Your Life, the joint life of you and your spouse or for a Specified Period of Time 10 Year to 30 Years. Contrary to what you read and hear, you can add guarantees to the Life Options. This can be in the form of an Installment Refund Guarantee or a Certain Period. The tradeoff is a lower monthly income stream and is not as low as you may think. The younger you are the less the trade off is. You should never purchase the inflation protection option. There are other strategies you can employ to increase your monthly payouts in the future. Safety, Simplicity and No Fees: You know up front how much of a Lump-sum you need to exchange for the Monthly Payment you receive. Nothing else is charged to you nothing is deducted from your payments. It is what it is! Immediate Income Annuities are all about Guaranteed Fixed Spendable Monthly Cash Flows that you receive each month for life. When youre in Retirement these Cash Flows are whats important to you. Nothing else comes close in importance. Having a Guaranteed Monthly Income Stream as part of your Portfolio improves the performance of your Entire Retirement Portfolio. How? It allows you to focus on investing long-term for maximum compounded return without having to worry about your monthly spendable funds/cash flows. A point that is unique, very important and never discussed in buying a lifetime annuity The waiting for Higher Monthly Payouts. Remember Immediate Income Annuities are based on how long you live even when you add a guarantee. We all know that you will die at a point in time in the future. We just dont know when that point in time is. So, weather you Buy an Immediate Income Annuity today, 1 Year for now or 2 Years from now is not going to change the point in time payments will stop (Your date of Death). Therefore, each month you wait to Buy this annuity is a month of cash flow you forgo. Wait a Year and it may take years to make up that loss of cash flow and you may never make it up. My point Once you are at or near the point when you need monthly cash flow and you have made the decision that Immediate Income Annuities are what you want to help meet your retirement income needs then it simply makes no economic sense to wait. In the last 10 years, the Payouts in Immediate Income Annuities are not materially different from the high point to low point especially on the Life Options which are based on the very long end of the Yield Curve. As an example the 30 Year Treasury Bond Yield today is 4.66%. The two peak yields in the last 10 years were ~ 5.35% in June of 2007 and ~ 6.23% in February 2000 (moved quickly into the mid 5%s after). Not much of a range If you really think about it. Yes, Immediate Income Annuities, Fixed Rate Annuities and Index Annuities when honestly reviewed should play a role in everyones portfolio for a percentage of your investable long-term assets from age 50 up and until the day you die. They provide safety, predictability, an attractive rate of interest and Cash Flows during Retirement that cant be safely matched by other assets of like dollar amounts you may allocate into...
Posted by: mk at 06/09/2010 09:57:31 AM
I am 63. I have four $100,000 income annuities with four different life insurance companies for diversification. I receive four checks a month until I die. Each check is over $700. My annuities are insured by Michigan Guaranty Assoc. My annuities plus my social security pay me over $5000 a month. I am very happy and recommend income annuities for retirement income. I switched from the stock market roller coaster {worry all the time) to {never worry} income annuities. Now I can sleep at night without worrying about a stock market crash. I shopped everywhere for the highest paying annuities. I bought my annuities from Hersh Stern at annuities.com.(He is the best!) I checked out each insurance company at my local library for insurance company ratings. (A.M.Best) I did my home work. The paper quote I received from Hersh Stern at income annuities was about $50 higher per month on each $100,000 annuity then everyone else including Fidel...and Vang.... Thats $200 more a month in my pocket. Most state guaranty assoc. only guarranty up to $100,000 on regular money and up to $ 250,000 on untaxed IRA money. Hersh Stern will send you free packet quote with a list of every state and there level of protection. I have been receiving income annuities for two years now. Its the best decision I ever made. I did my home work and it paid off. If I tried to live off my savings instead of a guaranteed annuity I would run out of money in about 12 years. My retirement savings would run dry before age 75. With an annuity I never run out of money.You cant beat guaranteed income for life. The stock market can crash and my checks will still come through in the mail. Dont believe people that tell you not to buy income annuities. I plan on buying another one from Stern in the future. The longer you wait,the higher the monthly payout. I love my four income annuities from Hersh Stern. I first read about this company in Money magazine and other money publications. I wanted to make sure I wasn't sending my $400.000 to a Bernie Madoff! My annuities are with Genworth, New York Life, Metlife and North American Life. These companies are all rated A+. I am diversified. I cant wait to purchase another annuity at age 65. Good Luck!
Posted by: CHAKKA at 09/13/2010 08:53:34 PM
Has anybody considered how inflation will impact that lifetime income stream from a fixed annuity? Your monthly $700 today may only be worth $250 in 10 years' time.