Making Your Money Last

An Income Stream to Last a Lifetime

No company pension? You can create one of your own.

By Anne Kates Smith, Senior Associate Editor

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, September 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Imagine a retirement-savings well that never runs dry, no matter how long you live. If that's the dream of future retirees, why are annuities, which make that very promise, such a minuscule part of our collective nest egg?

This so-called annuity puzzle has baffled academics, policymakers and financial advisers for decades. Now, as more retirees shift their focus from accumulating assets to spending them, solutions to the puzzle may finally be emerging.

In exchange for a lump sum, annuities guarantee retirees regular payments for the rest of their lives. Sounds attractive, but investors have long shunned annuities, citing high fees, low returns and the inability to bequeath the money to heirs. Worst of all, there's the "bus" risk -- that is, the chance of getting hit by one, or meeting some other untimely demise and not getting your money's worth.

"I've explored all the perfectly rational reasons people don't like annuities, and I've concluded there's something more fundamental," says Jeffrey Brown, a finance professor at the University of Illinois. Namely, he says, we're trained to think in terms of accumulating wealth, with a focus on rates of return, market risk and the like. As an investment, an annuity just doesn't stack up.

But if your objective is to ensure enough money to live on no matter how long you live -- think consumption instead of accumulation -- then an annuity is a no-brainer. "I just tell clients that they're buying their own pension," says financial planner Jim Saulnier, in Fort Collins, Colo. "That grabs their attention."

In a world with fewer corporate pensions, longer retirements and substantial 401(k) balances, annuities should loom large in most retirement plans. Borrowing from the playbook of the 401(k) industry is the way to make that happen, says a group of researchers at the Retirement Security Project in Washington, D.C. The group is pitching a plan to employers that would let retirees "test drive" an annuity by automatically channeling a portion of 401(k) assets into one at retirement, similar to the way many workers are automatically enrolled in 401(k) savings plans at the start of their career. After two years, retirees could opt out.

Specifics -- such as how much to put into which type of annuity -- would vary. In general, Saulnier suggests putting no more than one-fourth to one-third of your portfolio into an immediate annuity, or just enough to cover required expenses. He rarely chooses inflation protection because the monthly payout is so much lower it takes years of inflation adjustments to catch up. He does recommend a "period certain" feature -- meaning that if you die before a certain cut-off date, your heirs will receive annuity payouts until the cutoff. Check annuities and their prices at www.immediateannuities.com.

If you designate less for an annuity -- say, 10% to 15% of your portfolio -- then a longevity annuity may be a better choice, says Jason Scott, of Financial Engines. Because payouts don't start until later in life, perhaps in your eighties, longevity annuities cost less to purchase. Plus, with the worry of outliving your money off the table, these annuities let you spend more freely in retirement. And isn't that what we're all saving for?

Get Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine for $12. Save 75%!

Discuss

Reader Comments (23)

Posted by: wkgrt at 08/25/2008 09:39:37 AM

This...sounds like a re-dress of old "whole life" policies that insurance companies pushed 20 years ago.

Posted by: Nomen at 08/25/2008 09:55:19 AM

"...all the perfectly rational reasons people don't like annuities..." How about lack of trust? After years of watching huge executive salaries coupled with company and employee losses ,after watching the largest financial institutions brought down by questionable business practices and risky investments, after watching the stock market floundering,why would I give anyone control of a big chunk of my retirement savings? I've looked into a dozen major annuity plans. After all the hype and verbal guarantees,I have always been stopped by the fine print which says there is NO guarantee that you won't lose your investment. Until the finance world cleans up its act and some strict regulations are put into place,TRUST will be the biggest obstacle for annuities to overcome. My second reason for shunning annuities is simply that I'm not worried about outliving my money. As an anonymous old person said "They haven't left anyone above ground yet."

Posted by: Martin at 08/25/2008 10:03:46 AM

I think telling people to buy annuities is one of the worst things to recommend. It's not that hard to open a discount broker account, buy closed-end funds that pay monthly income, and always be able to access your money in a emergency. I wish the author would let me write up how exactly to do that so the reader would be presented a better working alternative.

Posted by: Scott Roberts at 08/25/2008 10:24:13 AM

As an Investment professional I am surprised that this article doesn't talk about how annuties have changed over the years. There are several annuities that do offer a guarantee that you won't lose your principal and offer an additional guarantee of 5, 6 or even 7 percent returns on top of how your investment performs. They also allow you to choose your investments within your annuity, very similar to the way a 401k works. Also, you can choose to take a payout without turning over control of your annuity to the issuing company and anything left over when you die can be left to your heirs...

Posted by: skeezaroonie at 08/25/2008 11:03:23 AM

And I would want to buy an annuity that effectively returns less than 1% instead of investing that money directly and taking a annual paydown from that account because . . .?

Posted by: bd at 08/25/2008 01:22:03 PM

I AGREE. Until there is something akin to FDIC deposit insurance for annuities, where you are insured by the FED govt against loss up to a certain amount, I wouldn't turn a large part of my nest egg over to ANY corporation for a mere promise that they will pay. NO way.

Posted by: Nichols at 08/25/2008 01:24:23 PM

The author uses "Guarantee?" What guarantee?

Posted by: aleck at 08/25/2008 02:59:29 PM

I'll give my perspective for annuity aversion. Annuity, aside from providing retirement income, is primarily designed to make money for the annuity issuer. By using statistical data of average lifespans, the company that sells annuity is almost guaranteed to make money. So, an average person is likely to lose money on the annuity compared to periodic distributions from a lump sum. An average person is now capable of putting numbers in a spreadsheet and realize that a period annuity quoted on the site linked in the article provides about 5% rate of return on an invested lump sum.

Posted by: Neil H Murphy at 08/25/2008 05:54:37 PM

I once read an article by two guys in the America Association of Individual Investors. Their research showed that porftolios of fixed income investments ran out of money before the indiduals ran out of retirement. When I was a kid first class postage was $0.03 now its 0.42 - you do the math.

Posted by: Banish Taylor at 08/25/2008 09:26:00 PM

All Annuities are expensive to buy and they all STINK!

Posted by: Jason C at 08/25/2008 11:21:33 PM

I find these comments interesting. I am willing to bet that every negative poster is male. Any insurance product (life, health, auto, annuity, etc) is about the transfer of risk, and yes, most insurance companies are not in the non-profit business. People often buy annuities based on how they feel about their future. The author points out using a portion in an immediate annuity, not every dime of a portfolio. A 20 - 25% investment in something that will provide a lifetime of income, say to cover basic expenses as the author suggests, is a good way for some people to hedge their risk of running out of money, if the other 75-80% tanks. If the other portion works as planned then they can possible keep up with inflation and have liquid money for other reasons. Either way, the investor can sleep well at night knowing that the annuity, or lifetime income stream, is there. There isn't any investment out there that is right for everyone, but annuities have there place for a certain segment of the investing population. It irritates me to hear, or read, such ignorant, one sided negative statements like the ones I have been reading so far. The number one fear of women investors, despite of income or net worth, is running out of money. It has nothing to do with ROI or expenses.

Posted by: aleck at 08/26/2008 11:09:53 AM

To Jason C's comment. If Jason is willing to bet on the responders' demographics, then I am willing to bet that he is a financial adviser (trying to sell) an overpriced product. If you are worried about running out of money, calculate the most conservative life expectancy and use money accordingly. Just because a product gives a piece of mind does not mean it is good. Does a protection plan offered by Best Buy for your new LCD TV give you a piece of mind? Sure. Is it a good investment? Absolutely not.

Posted by: PW at 08/26/2008 01:39:54 PM

Part of the hesitation is also not knowing much about how annuities work. Are they a legal ponzi scheme, where today's investors are paying for yesterday's? Or do the annuity managers invest in the markets? Either way there are questions about the solvency of the investment in the future. Most of our 401Ks are taking a hit with the rest of the markets because of the stupidity and greed of people -- including bankers and investment managers -- who put our money into shaky mortgage-backed securities. If annuity managers did the same, how do the losses affect future payouts? What's to say these will be there when we need them?

Posted by: Ellie at 08/27/2008 02:07:18 AM

I just got information on immediate annuities from AARP. The annuity income payments are guaranteed by NY Life Insurance and Annuity Corp. The monthly payment is guaranteed for how long a person lives. If a person passes before prematurely a "Cash Refund" feature that guarantees that you won't lose a penny of your premium. If you pass away before your total monthly income payments equal the full amount of your annuity purchase price, your beneficiary will be paid the difference! I think this is something to think about seriously. It would be a monthly check that can be counted on like a pension check - the same amount monthly for as long as you live!

Posted by: BW at 08/29/2008 06:12:02 PM

Nobody ever tells the people who are buying these annuities that they are a general creditor of the insurance company. Would most people be willing to take 1/3 of their assets as the author suggests and buy a single unsecured bond in AIG or Met Life or Aetna - hoping that they stay in business for the next 30 year. Certainly bondholder right now won't lend to these companies at the interest rates that the annuities are paying. Why should an investor. There's a reason that annuities are "sold" rather than bought - they pay the advisors/insurance salesman among the highest commissions of any product out there.

Posted by: Jason C at 08/30/2008 10:17:33 AM

...there are several types of annuities used for various purposes. I think it is unfair on here for some of the posters and their negative comments to lump them all together. I agree that Equity Indexed Annuities (EIA) have been extremely abused, expensive, and difficult to understand, and there are other investment instruments out there that can often achieve the same goal with more liquidity, transparency and lower cost. That is just one kind of annuity, however. BW makes some interesting points. I understand his point about bonds and creditors, it is a mathematical illustration. But let's just be clear here, with an annuity you do not have the rights of a bond holder and not a creditor of the firm. You have purchased a product. As for the word "Guarantee". The only investments that are guaranteed are FDIC deposits and US Treasury instruments. An annuity is only guaranteed by the strength of the insurance company's ability to pay claims. Insurance companies are highly regulated and must keep large pools of reserve funds and must meet certain requirement on their outstanding obligations. The reputable companies are rated by agencies like AM Best, Fitch, Standard and Poor's, and Moody's. This information can easily be obtained from a public library for free. To answer PW's comments about a Ponzi scheme, after doing a little research you will find that under the eyes of regulators and rating agencies it would be very, very difficult to run a scheme. By and large, due to the nature of their business and compliance standards, life insurance companies are some of the more conservatively run companies. They invest their reserves in a wide range of investments. At one time MetLife was the largest private holder of commercial real estate in the United States. However, in a worst case scenario, your insurance company goes bankrupt, most state regulators require an insurance company, as a requirement for doing business in that state, to enter a legal binding pact that will buy, service and honor the insurance contracts of the defunct insurance company. In addition, many of the larger insurance companies have their own form of insurance, called reinsurance, on themselves. These are policies issued by other, highly specialized insurance companies, that back up the life insurance company's ability to pay claims. All of this can be found out in your state and on your insurance company with very little research. As for the claims on this message board about annuities, salesmen, commissions, etc., there are several companies out there that offer their products on a no-load basis with no commission paid to the financial professional. Once again, a little research would prove this.

Posted by: Dave CFP at 09/05/2008 02:14:40 PM

There are very few circumstances that would warrant purchasing an annuity. The vast majority are fixed income streams. Would you take a job that would not give you a raise for the rest of your life? Then don't buy an annuity. Inflation will be the biggest problem for most retirees, and creating a non-inflation adjusted income with any or all of one's retirement assets is absolutely ridiculous. It is just the continuing ploy of the insurance industry to push them because agents make a lot of money to sell them...

Posted by: AP at 09/06/2008 01:34:49 AM

Dave...There are current annuity products that have an automatic step-up provision which allows your guaranteed annual income payment to INCREASE every year that the market is UP. That new gain increases your income and gets "LOCKED IN" and cannot go back down. WHich means every year that the market is up, you get a raise and once you get that raise it can never go backwards. Think of a ratchet.

Posted by: NJMC_CFP at 09/07/2008 11:58:25 AM

With the exception of Jason C, most of the comments here are nonsense. The simple (& low cost)immediate annuity (not any VA or EIA with their high costs and commissions)is the perfect product for most of the fixed income portion of a retirees portfolio. It's simple, an 8 - 9% payout on the annuity beats your common garden variety Treasury or Corporate bond for cash flow hands down. That cash flow enables you to have more stocks in your portfolio and not be forced to sell them for cash flow when the market is down. This combination has proven successful during all of our great bear markets ('29, 73-74+ and 2000 to 2002). If one wants to have a better chance of a long & succcessful retirement spending 5% of assets instead of 4%,(25% more), use immediate annuities. If not, don't buy them and hope for the best. Its your choice. For me buying 3 SPIAs (limited to $150K for state guarantee funds)combined with a pension with "retirement" in '99 allowed me to coast thru the '00-02 bear market and be up in assets and income by 50% since then. Don't knock something until you have researched it in detail. These academics have no axes to grind and they agree with my experience and research.

Posted by: hm at 09/09/2008 08:06:29 AM

Like others I have always seen annuities as a great way for insurance companies (and their agents) to bilk the public. But it occurs to me now that for people like me who haven't had the advantages of IRAs, 401Ks or other tax sheltering plans, the tax treatment seems helpful, maybe going some good way toward making up the difference between the annuity's low return and the return you would get in a conservative portfolio of other investments. If this thought is wrong, I would be happy to hear why. It occured, too, that outside of relying mostly on bonds, it would be clumsy trying to sort out an even monthly income stream. I assume that there are funds that do this, but I don't think there are many, and from what I've seen they don't pay very well either. So it seems like if you want to keep the larger portion of your investments in equities, the annuity could provide regular income without the need to sell small tranches of assets, and again saves creating tax events.

Posted by: DW at 10/06/2008 02:11:10 PM

NJMC_CFP - I generally agree with your comments and, in fact, have long planned to employ that sort of strategy for retirement. However - I do have a question - do you really have strong data supporting the strategy from the 1929 period? Or are you employing hypotheticals? Thanks.

Posted by: Ram at 12/11/2009 12:18:06 AM

The author says 10 to 20% of anyone's portfolio. How many corporates grants pension these days? Life Time Income annuities are not to be compared with Stocks and Real Estates since there is a downside on the later portfolio. Annuities can be structured the way you want. For example, A joint annuity (Grand pa and Grand son) with a 50% refund on death of both annuitants passed on to their heirs. Compare a grandpa aged 70 with a grand son aged 10 and the second generation getting the 50% death proceeds. Any one challenging it???

Posted by: Andrew at 01/25/2010 02:28:29 PM

what annuity is paying less than 1%? I have long wondered why it is that people without a background in finance feel the need to push what they watch on tv onto those who are actually concerened with their own personal situation. For starters my whole policy paid a NET of a little over 5% last year, how did that portfolio do? Secondly the average person taking out 4% annually of their portfolio has a significant chance of running out of money by the time they are 85. So let the insurance companies take that risk no the investor. What are you going to tell people when their bond investments drop 20% in value in the next 3 years due to inflation and increasing interest rates? Lifetime income annuities with inflation protection riders are an amazing vehicle for retirees that dont want to be in the drama that is going to be the stock market over the next 10 years until we hit another recession.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Save Money in February

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement