Cash in Hand
The No-Stock Portfolio
Try these investments to earn a decent return with less risk.
By Jeffrey R. Kosnett, Senior Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance
December 15, 2008
I'm starting to lose count of how many financial planners and investment advisers have been telling me lately what a great time this is to buy stocks. You've probably heard their basic argument: Share prices are cheap relative to earnings, cash dividends, historical growth rates and various arcane yardsticks. If you invest at these levels, or at least stick by your bullet-riddled stocks and mutual funds, say the pros, your fortitude will pay off by 2010, maybe even sooner.
Many of these same experts are quick to howl that Treasury bonds, the most-successful investments of 2008, are massively overpriced. With one-month Treasury bills yielding virtually nothing and ten-year Treasury notes paying a scant 2.5%, the government has switched from offering low-risk investments to providing cold storage. I cannot recommend that anyone buy Treasury securities at these rates.
RELATED LINKS![]() | |||
![]() |
Six Reasons to Buy Stocks Now | ||
![]() |
Investing Outlook 2009 | ||
The orthodox response to this year's awful market is to stick with stocks (see Six Reasons to Buy Stocks Now), best accomplished by investing monthly or quarterly. Automatic buying frees you from panic-selling and rushed bandwagon-buying. Don't worry about picking among growth stocks and value stocks, big companies and small companies, foreign and domestic, industrial stocks and consumer stocks. Just about everything is cheap.
If you believe in "reversion to the mean" (the idea that extremes balance out), such blue chips as AT&T (symbol T), Caterpillar (CAT) and General Electric (GE) look like no-brainers. Their prices are 30% to 60% below their five-year highs and 30% to 40% lower than they were one year ago.
An exchange-traded fund, WisdomTree Total Dividend (DTD), gives you a cross-section of battered blue chips and pays a current dividend yield of 4.6%, nearly two percentage points more than what a ten-year Treasury IOU pays. Over the past few weeks, I bought DTD on four different occasions, 100 shares at a time whenever the Dow industrials fell by triple-digit amounts.
Yet I respect that many of you would like to earn a decent return without tying your fortunes to stocks. This may sound like trying to eat meat without harming any livestock, and if you've tried tofu turkey or soy-protein bacon, you've probably concluded that you should either eat the real thing or forswear the idea of meat in disguise.
But the more I think about it, the more comfortable I've gotten with the notion that it is possible to earn respectable money without holding common stocks. Low or nonexistent inflation, tax advantages, high yields, a strong dollar and the collapse of real estate and commodity prices are on your side. T-bills and CDs aren't your only options.
So, here's my Tofurky Portfolio. It looks like the real thing but it's not as risky, and I hope you'll find it just as tasty.
Blue-chip IOUs (15% of your assets). Do it with high-quality corporate bonds, which are sporting unusually generous yields. One of my favorite pickups recently was a Wal-Mart bond maturing in 2038 with a 6.2% coupon. I bought the bond, rated AA by Standard & Poor's, for 98 cents on the dollar. Today, it's trading at 105 cents on the dollar. The bond cannot be called, which means that Wal-Mart cannot redeem it before maturity should interest rates go lower.
Maybe Wal-Mart's stock will return more than 6.2% a year for the next 30 years, but it hasn't done squat for the last ten. If Wal-Mart's business remains sound but doesn't grow as fast as the company did in its heyday, the bond offers comparable returns but with less risk. Look at the bonds of other famous companies, and you'll see that the Wal-Mart issue is only one of many possibilities.
Real estate investment trust preferreds (15%). REIT preferreds, like REIT common stocks, have been clobbered this year. A mutual fund that specializes in REIT preferreds, Grubb & Ellis AGA Realty Income Fund (GBEIX), debuted at $10 in July and is now at $5.65.
Preferreds' edge is that their holders get their dividends before the common stockholders get theirs. Most REIT preferreds are callable, but not for a year or two, and besides, what REIT would redeem for $25 preferred shares that are trading for $15 to $17?
With their depressed prices, preferred REITs are sporting wild yields. Try 13% from the preferreds of Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE), a REIT that houses biotech and scientific facilities. The yield is the same for the preferred of Corporate Office Properties Trust (OFC), which, not surprisingly, owns offices. Go down the list of REIT preferreds on the New York Stock Exchange and you can spread your money around all kinds of properties.
Energy (15%). Oil, gas and coal prices have plunged more than the broad stock averages, and to most of us, that's just fine. Who wants to cough up $100 to fill up an SUV? Who can? But oil and natural-gas prices may have sunk too low. They will rebound. Two exchange-traded funds -- U.S. Oil Trust (USO) and U.S. Natural Gas Fund (UNG) -- follow the price of these commodities to the upside as well as the down and are simpler to understand than futures and partnerships. They aren't perfect, but neither are the shares of Exxon and Schlumberger.
Tax-free income (15%). For reasons I could take five screens to explain, tax-exempt bonds are unbelievably cheap. Here's what I mean: Buy a ten-year Treasury and you get 2.5%, taxable at your marginal federal income-tax rate. A typical ten-year state or local municipal bond with a top credit rating yields more than 4% and sometimes more than 5%. That's quite an advantage.
Gold (5%). I've never loved the stuff. My friend and colleague Bob Frick laid out the case against it in a recent Kiplinger.com article, Is Gold Right for You?. But if you insist on holding some yellow metal, use iShares Comex Gold Trust (IAU), a neat ETF that tracks the price of gold. You needn't store coins or wonder whether a dealer is legit or overcharging you.
A rank speculation (5%). Junk bonds are yielding 20 percentage points more than Treasury securities of the same maturity. You can't buy a new junk-bond issue nowadays because nobody is actually issuing junk debt, only trading a dwindling supply of existing bonds.
But if you bravely step into one of the more respectable junk-bond mutual funds, such as Northeast Investors Trust (NTHEX), you can obtain a diversified package of low-grade bonds that yields about 13%. If you're lucky, junk-bond prices will stop sinking and you'll at least earn that fat yield -- and perhaps some capital appreciation, once investors start sensing that we're not heading into a depression.
Add all of the above to your holdings in CDs, Treasury inflation-protected securities, high-yield online savings deposits, and short-term U.S. government-agency bonds, and you are fully exposed to all the food groups of U.S. financial markets without owning any common stocks. I said no stocks and I meant it.
This improbable portfolio lost about 15% in 2008 through December 15 -- hardly a terrific result. But investments such as preferreds and gold and corporate bonds have also produced double-digit up years. Just because you don't own stocks doesn't mean you have to abandon all hope for growth and solid dividends.




Reader Comments (7)
Posted by: Jane at 12/16/2008 08:50:39 AM
What about I-bonds? what about agency bonds? Why no other commodities besides oil and gold, like agri? what about currency ETFs? If you're willing to say something like "if you're lucky, junk bond prices will stop sinking" in THIS market, you can't say ANY of the above are "too risky."
Posted by: Martin Weiss at 12/16/2008 10:26:21 AM
...Wall Street cheerleaders refuse to admit that an obviously massive deflation can lead to an equally massive collapse in the nation’s economy. They’ve repeatedly sworn on a stack of Bibles that the deflation in housing would “soon end,” the crisis would be “contained” and everything would be “just fine.” They’ve tried to persuade nearly every investor to stay the course, keep their money in the stock market, or even buy more. But as 2008 comes to a close, no one can possibly deny that the U.S. economy is in deep trouble. Anyone can see the evidence — the sharpest declines in the economy since the 1970s, the worst debt crisis in a lifetime, the largest financial failures and bailouts in history. Everyone can also agree on the likely causes — the economic blunders of Washington, the financial greed of Wall Street, the big debts and bets by almost everyone. And no one could dispute the probable consequences — surging unemployment and potentially years of hardship for millions of Americans. Yet despite this widespread agreement, nearly every authority still tries to persuade you to keep your money in the stock market. Financial experts on NBC Nightly News tell millions of viewers that, as long as they’ve got plenty of years to live and recoup losses, they should continue investing most of their 401k or IRA in stocks. Suze Orman on Oprah advises millions more to continue socking away their retirement money in stocks regardless of any market decline...Their unwavering message: Don’t sell. Stick with it. Buy more. Read what you can do to protect yourself in the coming year...(in the book) Deflation strikes hard! What to do …
Posted by: Censorship sucks at 12/16/2008 11:10:11 AM
...Investing in the stock market is a SCHILL game...
Posted by: Jeff Kosnett at 12/16/2008 05:41:39 PM
Jane, this Jeff Kosnett, author of this column. Agency bonds would be safe but the yields are too low to be suitable for a growth portfolio. Agricultural commodities would be fine, I'd endorse a farmland partnership but the ones I've seen are either illiquid or open only to accredited investors. Obviously there are other investments besides stocks that could add to this suggested collection. Hope this helps.
Posted by: closer at 12/20/2008 09:58:01 AM
This "improbable portfolio" strikes me as a grab bag of speculative asset classes. Its"growth" oriented strategy is based more on wishful thinking that the depressed prices of preferred REITS, muni bonds, commodities (gold, oil, natural gas), and high-yield corporate "junk" bonds will stop sliding and recover their value. With its weighting in energy and gold, such a portfolio would likely show high volatility on a day to day basis. With the exception of "Blue-chip IOUs" (investment-grade corporate bonds), the suggested asset classes are vulnerable to continued deflation of commodity prices and property values, junk bond defaults. The author tells a poster that yields of U.S. agency bonds are "too low to be suitable for a growth portfolio." Retirees take note: The author is reaching for growth and higher yields rather than capital preservation and reasonable yields.
Posted by: Brenda at 12/21/2008 08:23:54 AM
How do annuities fit into this picture?
Posted by: numericalexample.com at 05/18/2009 08:19:45 AM
Maybe its worth to have a look at the Trading Simulator, a new free online trading tool. You can find the tool by searching on the following: "Trading Simulator" numericalexample Users can enter almost any number of transactions, dividends, an initial cash balance, interest rates, costs and dividends. The Trading Simulator computes the value of your portfolio, the costs, the interest received or paid and the ROI. In addition the Trading Simulator produces two time graphs. The top graph shows the value of the portfolio, the cash part and the investments. The second graph shows the value of each (risk) category of your investments.