Why You Should Delay Social Security Benefits
And the three reasons you might opt to claim sooner.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered daily
Kiplinger Today
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more delivered daily. Smart money moves start here.
Sent five days a week
Kiplinger A Step Ahead
Get practical help to make better financial decisions in your everyday life, from spending to savings on top deals.
Delivered daily
Kiplinger Closing Bell
Get today's biggest financial and investing headlines delivered to your inbox every day the U.S. stock market is open.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Adviser Intel
Financial pros across the country share best practices and fresh tactics to preserve and grow your wealth.
Delivered weekly
Kiplinger Tax Tips
Trim your federal and state tax bills with practical tax-planning and tax-cutting strategies.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Retirement Tips
Your twice-a-week guide to planning and enjoying a financially secure and richly rewarding retirement
Sent bimonthly.
Kiplinger Adviser Angle
Insights for advisers, wealth managers and other financial professionals.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Investing Weekly
Your twice-a-week roundup of promising stocks, funds, companies and industries you should consider, ones you should avoid, and why.
Sent weekly for six weeks
Kiplinger Invest for Retirement
Your step-by-step six-part series on how to invest for retirement, from devising a successful strategy to exactly which investments to choose.
With more than 10,000 baby boomers crossing the retirement threshold each day, I get my share of clients asking whether they should delay their Social Security benefits. For many retirees, that can be a $200,000+ decision. That's the amount that top earners can expect to receive in excess of their normal benefits should they delay them until age 70.
Each year you delay your benefits past the age of 66 increases your benefit payout by 8%. Waiting until age 70 to start benefits results in a 32% increase in your monthly benefit for life. So I have to ask someone considering the question: "Where else can you earn a guaranteed 8% return on your money?"
Some planners argue that the benefit formula is actuarially sound and that, if you live an average lifespan, you'll receive roughly the same amount in benefits regardless of when you start them. The reasoning being that, if you take them at your full retirement age, you will receive a greater number of payments than if you wait.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
That may have been true one or two decades ago, but the formula, which was devised in 1983, doesn't take into account the current low interest rate environment or the greatly expanded life spans of today.
In today's environment, the question becomes, "Which assets should you sell off to generate income: your low-yielding assets or your high-yielding assets?" If you consider for the moment your Social Security benefit is an asset—after all, it generates an income stream, which has a present value—and it is generating an 8% return, wouldn't it make sense to keep it working for you? For high earning couples, the asset equivalent of their Social Security can be as high as $600,000 or $700,000. Even at $400,000 or $500,000, Social Security represents a sizable portion of a retirement portfolio.
In many ways, Social Security benefits function very similar to Treasury Inflation Protection Securities (TIPS), in that they have a fixed rate of return adjusted by inflation. However, in some ways, Social Security is even better because payouts are based on assumptions made more than three decades ago. As inflation increases, so too do the inflation-adjusted payments, which increases the value of the asset. The longer you live past the assumed mortality rate of 1983, the more valuable your benefits. But that won't always be the case. When interest rates increase, the value of Social Security benefits will decrease.
There may come a time when a bond portfolio will outperform Social Security, but for now, that is not the case. The growth of your Social Security asset is delivering a higher risk-adjusted return than most people generate in their investment portfolios. In the current environment, very few investments are outperforming delayed Social Security benefits. No other investment vehicle offers the following five things: inflation protection, government guarantee, lifetime income, has spousal and survivor benefits and eliminates market risk.
But return is only one part of the equation. As with any critical financial decision, there is no pat answer for this; it depends almost entirely on individual circumstances. However, in guiding my clients' decision, I do suggest that there may be only three reasons they might consider not delaying their benefits:
1. You really need the money.
If you didn't plan well and have to rely on your Social Security benefits to cover your lifestyle needs, then you may have no choice—other than, perhaps, continuing to work in some capacity. A part-time job could generate sufficient income to allow you to delay your benefits.
2. You're disabled.
If you are disabled and are claiming Social Security disability benefits, they automatically convert to a retirement benefit at your full retirement age.
3. You're sick, or you don't expect to live to your life expectancy.
This may be a good reason to start Social Security benefits as soon as possible, except if you are married.
For married couples the goal should be to maximize the lifetime income of the couple not just the individual. When you delay your benefits, they increase not only for you, but also for your surviving spouse. So the spouse with the largest social security income should wait to claim benefits until age 70, in order to maximize lifetime and survivor benefits. If you should die prematurely, your surviving spouse will receive the higher of his or her own benefit or the one you leave behind. If your spouse's earnings were significantly less than yours, he or she may benefit more from the survivor benefit.
Outside of these three reasons, everyone should consider delaying their Social Security. Of course, such a critical decision should be based on a comprehensive analysis of your retirement income need, an evaluation of your retirement portfolio and a detailed spend-down plan.
Craig Slayen is a principal at Cypress Partners., a financial planning and investment management firm in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Pete Woodring, a partner with Cypress Partners, contributed to this article.
-
The Cost of Leaving Your Money in a Low-Rate AccountWhy parking your cash in low-yield accounts could be costing you, and smarter alternatives that preserve liquidity while boosting returns.
-
I want to sell our beach house to retire now, but my wife wants to keep it.I want to sell the $610K vacation home and retire now, but my wife envisions a beach retirement in 8 years. We asked financial advisers to weigh in.
-
How to Add a Pet Trust to Your Estate PlanAdding a pet trust to your estate plan can ensure your pets are properly looked after when you're no longer able to care for them. This is how to go about it.
-
How to Add a Pet Trust to Your Estate Plan: Don't Leave Your Best Friend to Chance
Adding a pet trust to your estate plan can ensure your pets are properly looked after when you're no longer able to care for them. This is how to go about it.
-
Want to Avoid Leaving Chaos in Your Wake? Don't Leave Behind an Outdated Estate PlanAn outdated or incomplete estate plan could cause confusion for those handling your affairs at a difficult time. This guide highlights what to update and when.
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: This Is Why I Became an Advocate for Fee-Only Financial AdviceCan financial advisers who earn commissions on product sales give clients the best advice? For one professional, changing track was the clear choice.
-
65 or Older? Cut Your Tax Bill Before the Clock Runs OutThanks to the OBBBA, you may be able to trim your tax bill by as much as $14,000. But you'll need to act soon, as not all of the provisions are permanent.
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: This Is the $300,000 Social Security Decision Many People Get WrongDeciding when to claim Social Security is a complex, high-stakes decision that shouldn't be based on fear or simple break-even math.
-
4 Ways Washington Could Put Your Retirement at Risk (and How to Prepare)Legislative changes, such as shifting tax brackets or altering retirement account rules, could affect your nest egg, so it'd be prudent to prepare. Here's how.
-
Is Your Retirement Plan Built for 2026 — or Stuck in 2006?It's time to move away from the 4% rule and the 60/40 portfolio to an adaptable, tax-diversified strategy focused on reliable income and longevity.
-
Filed for Social Security Too Soon? 2 Ways to Get a Do-OverIf you've claimed Social Security too soon, two SSA rules allow a do-over. But be warned: Using them clumsily can lead to surprise repayments or lost benefits.
