Sometimes it pays to be small, or at least smaller.
L-3 Communications competes for defense contracts with companies twice its size. The New York City-based company can hang with the giants because it focuses on products that improve the efficiency of existing military projects and develops tools and services that will work for a broad range of customers.
Meanwhile, the five major defense behemoths, such as Boeing and Lockheed Martin, have to rely on concentrated portfolios of big projects. Should a giant lose a major contract, the company will take a big haircut on its sales and earnings.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
L-3, which has grown over the years through a series of acquisitions, is not dependent on a couple of major projects for its success. Instead, it earns its keep with a basket of smaller contracts.
The current demands for military equipment play to L-3's strengths, says Bob Sweet, managing editor of Dow Theory Forecasts newsletter. The U.S. Defense Department, the company's top customer, wants more guided weapons, unmanned aerial vehicles, communications equipment and missile defenses. These are niches in which L-3 has an advantage.
For example, the company develops software that relays information from unmanned surveillance planes to troops on the ground. It also provides encryption technology and manages satellite communications for the military.
Homeland security is the company's fastest-growing business. For the first nine months of 2007, sales at its specialized-products division -- the one that caters to homeland-security customers -- grew 12% year over year, to $3.4 billion. (The company had total sales of $10.2 billion in the first nine months of 2007, up 11%, and analysts estimate that L-3 generated revenues of $13.7 billion for the entire year; fourth-quarter earnings are due out on January 31.)
The budget for the U.S. Homeland Security Department rose 9%, to $35 billion, for the fiscal year that ends this September. "L-3 is a major contractor for the department and most of these organizations prefer to work with contractors they know," Sweet says. "So I expect L-3 to be a main beneficiary of the budget increase."
One drag on defense stocks may be a growing perception that the Democrats will win the White House and try to cut defense spending. Yet, L-3 is less sensitive than most contractors to declines in overall defense spending because of its smaller contracts.
"If you need to trim $50 billion from the defense budget, you're not going to try to find 100 $500 million contracts to ax," Sweet says. "You are more likely to look for a couple $20 billion weapons platforms to scale back or cut."
That's not to say L-3 hasn't experienced contracting setbacks. In December, the U.S. Army denied L-3 the opportunity to renew a contract to provide translators in Iraq. L-3 is appealing the Army's decision, but there's only a slim chance of a reversal.
"The loss of the contract is already reflected in the stock price and the shares have recovered substantially since that news has come out," Sweet says. He places L-3 stock (symbol LLL) on Dow Theory Forecasts' focus list, which includes the newsletter's top 20 picks over the next 12 months.
The stock closed at $104.03 on January 8, down only 0.2% on a day when the Dow industrials fell 1.9%. L-3 carries a market value of $13 billion and trades at 16 times the $6.49 per share that analysts expect the company to earn in 2008 (analysts estimate that the company earned $5.92 per share in 2007). "The valuation seems reasonable for the kind of growth this company should be able to put together," Sweet says.
-
Americans, Even With Higher Incomes, Are Feeling the SqueezeA 50-year mortgage probably isn’t the answer, but there are other ways to alleviate the continuing sting of high prices
-
Hiding the Truth From Your Financial Adviser Can Cost YouHiding assets or debt from a financial adviser damages the relationship as well as your finances. If you're not being fully transparent, it's time to ask why.
-
How to Manage a Disagreement With Your Financial AdviserKnowing how to deal with a disagreement can improve both your finances and your relationship with your planner.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Caterpillar Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayCaterpillar stock has been a remarkably resilient market beater for a very long time.
-
I'm a 55-Year-Old Dad. Here’s How My 28-Year-Old Daughter Showed Me That AXP Is Still a Solid InvestmentAmerican Express stock is still a solid investment because management understands the value of its brand and is building a wide moat around it.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into AMD Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayAdvanced Micro Devices stock is soaring thanks to AI, but as a buy-and-hold bet, it's been a market laggard.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UPS Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUnited Parcel Service stock has been a massive long-term laggard.
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First Year of Trump's Second TermSix months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Lowe's Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayLowe's stock has delivered disappointing returns recently, but it's been a great holding for truly patient investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into 3M Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayMMM stock has been a pit of despair for truly long-term shareholders.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Coca-Cola Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayEven with its reliable dividend growth and generous stock buybacks, Coca-Cola has underperformed the broad market in the long term.
