I was going to call this column "Taking a Smart Flier" until I started reading definitions of flier. Among the nicer entries was one suggesting that it was the investment equivalent of a Hail Mary pass. So forget fliers -- even though my top pick for 2008 is a stock that some might consider risky. I don't, and I want to explain how such a seeming long shot can actually be a prudent investment. Indeed, you can aim for huge gains without desperately hurling your wallet toward the end zone.
Why do so many amateur speculators come to grief? Money manager John Train knows: "In all games, the difference between the amateur and the professional is that the professional plays the odds, while the amateur, whether he realizes it or not, is, among other things, a thrill seeker."
Personally, I like prudent thrills. Buying a stock that could plunge 72% on a relatively likely event, such as an adverse regulatory ruling, would make my stomach churn. On the other hand, carefully researched speculations -- those that cost you little or no money even if you're wrong but enable you to make a killing if you're right -- can be an important part of a portfolio.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
And the pick is ... I've recommended three stocks in this column. JLG Industries tripled before it was bought in 2006. Scientific Games (symbol SGMS) and Investools (SWIM) each rose 51% in a year. And now, I like Communicate.com (CMNN.OB), which was planning a name change as we went to press.
A hedge-fund buddy says, "If I found a million dollars, I'd put it all into Communicate." Crazy? Not if you look at the math or the management. Communicate.com owns more than 1,100 domain names. About 30 of them, including Perfume.com, Body.com, Boxing.com and Cricket.com, are quite valuable. In fact, the company, which is based in Vancouver, Canada, turned down $6 million for Cricket.com because it wants to build the site itself. (ESPN paid $35 million for Cric-info.com, the leading cricket site. As for other domain names, Business.com fetched $350 million and HowStuffWorks.com went for $250 million.)
Communicate.com traded in mid January on the OTC Bulletin Board at $1.97, giving it a market value of $47 million. It is arguably worth 50% more than that right now, simply based on the value of its domain names, its $7 million in cash (it has no debt) and its most active site, Perfume.com, which has revenues of about $10 million and is thus worth, by my reckoning, at least $20 million.
Further gains in e-commerce and online advertising are inevitable, so Communicate.com benefits from a powerful tail wind. But many companies riding megatrends have plunged into the abyss, so that's no guarantee.
So why am I a believer? For a company with 2006 sales of just $8.4 million, Communicate.com has extraordinary management. Chief executive Geoff Hampson has a fine record with startups; he took one from $250,000 in annual revenues to $61 million in five years. President Jonathan Ehrlich had the unenviable task of butting heads with Amazon.com when he ran the online division of Indigo Books and Music, the largest bookseller in Canada. Indigo and Ehrlich won.
Mystery question. Why all this talent at a peanut of a company? "Our opportunity is very large," says Ehrlich. "We have Fifth Avenue real estate, and it just needs to be developed."
In the first half of 2008, the company hopes to raise $15 million to $40 million through a stock offering, preferably at a price well north of $2. With the money, it intends to turn Cricket.com into a top site (cricket, the world's second most popular sport, is especially big in India), and it will expand Perfume.com, perhaps by buying some competitors. It will develop other domain names, license them or sell them.
Insiders have been buying the stock. You should, too.
-
The Stoic Retirement: Ancient Wisdom for Today's RealityA "Stoic retirement" doesn't mean depriving yourself. It's a character-based approach to life and aging that can bring calm and clarity.
-
My Teen Crashed His Car and Now Our Insurance Has Tripled. What Now?Dealing with the costly aftermath of a teen car accident is stressful. Here are your options for navigating it.
-
11 Outrageous Ways To Spend Money in RetirementWhether you have excess cash to spend or want to pretend, here’s a look at 11 ridiculous ways retirees can splurge.
-
What the Rich Know About Investing That You Don'tPeople like Warren Buffett become people like Warren Buffett by following basic rules and being disciplined. Here's how to accumulate real wealth.
-
How to Invest for Rising Data Integrity RiskAmid a broad assault on venerable institutions, President Trump has targeted agencies responsible for data critical to markets. How should investors respond?
-
What Tariffs Mean for Your Sector ExposureNew, higher and changing tariffs will ripple through the economy and into share prices for many quarters to come.
-
How to Invest for Fall Rate Cuts by the FedThe probability the Fed cuts interest rates by 25 basis points in October is now greater than 90%.
-
Are Buffett and Berkshire About to Bail on Kraft Heinz Stock?Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway own a lot of Kraft Heinz stock, so what happens when they decide to sell KHC?
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First 6 Months of Trump's Second TermSix months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged: What the Experts Are SayingFederal Reserve As widely expected, the Federal Open Market Committee took a 'wait-and-see' approach toward borrowing costs.
-
Fed Sees Fewer Rate Cuts in 2025: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve cut interest rates as expected, but the future path of borrowing costs became more opaque.
