A predictable dispute is breaking out over whether the legalization of gay marriage in Iowa and Vermont portends a dramatic shift in the battle. Gay rights forces certainly have plenty to cheer about, but are they right, as they like to argue, that same sex marriage in America is inevitable?
If they mean inevitable as in within a few decades, they may be right. But if they mean within a few years, they need to consider the slow pace in which political, judicial and public opinion tends to change.
While no one can dispute the importance of the changes in Iowa and Vermont, there is plenty of disagreement over the broader significance. Take polls on gay marriage and civil unions. They vary widely depending upon how questions are phrased and what, exactly, is being asked. But generally opponents of gay marriage out poll supporters by 10-15 percentage points -- 55%-39% in a Newsweek poll in December last year and 55%-44% in a CNN poll the same month, for example. But when asked whether gay couples should be granted civil unions that give them most of the same rights of a married couple, those numbers flip-flop, clearly a sign that the public is generally sympathetic to the rights of homosexual couples but queasy about same-sex marriage.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Some opponents to gay marriage argue that the poll numbers have been essentially static for a number years and support for same-sex marriage is not growing. Gay rights advocates, encouraged by the feeling that the American comfort-zone on the issue is growing, don't seem concerned by that argument. They see a number of other factors, including the judicial system, on their side.It's worth noting that courts often are far ahead of the public on some issues. In 1967, the year that the Supreme Court struck down bans on interracial marriage, some 72% of Americans opposed mixed race marriages. It wasn't until 1991 that opponents of those marriages dropped into the minority.
That's a cheery statistic -- and a much cited one -- for backers of gay rights. But it does ignore a very salient fact: This Supreme Court today is far more conservative than the liberal Warren Court of the 1960s. For that reason and many other social, political and strategic factors, it may be a long time before the issue of gay marriage gets to -- and is accepted by -- the highest court in the land.
So what does "inevitable" mean in terms of time? Well, first, inevitable is a bad word when it comes to politics and public opinion -- attitudes shift and weave over time and can go down as well as up. Remember, support for same sex marriage dropped (read comments of Pew Research Center's Scott Keeter) after the Masachusetts Supreme Court cleared the way in 2003 for it to became the first state in the country to permit them.
More than any other factor, the real determinant could be demographics. Nate Silver, a polling expert who runs the astute blog www.fivethirtyeight.com (and who argues with careful numbers that support for gay marriage and civil unions is growing, but slowly), points out an important characteristic of most polling on the issue: Support for gay marriage and opposition to it is generational. He cites a CBS news poll in March that shows 64% of voters aged 18-45 supported either gay marriage or civil unions, but only 45 percent of voters aged 65 and up did. From there, the math is easy, at least for Silver: "Civil unions have already achieved the support of an outright majority of Americans, and as those older voters are replaced by younger ones, the smart money is that gay marriage will reach majority status too at some point in the 2010s."
-
December Fed Meeting: Live Updates and CommentaryThe December Fed meeting is one of the last key economic events of 2025, with Wall Street closely watching what Chair Powell & Co. will do about interest rates.
-
This Is Why Investors Shouldn't Romanticize BitcoinInvestors should treat bitcoin as the high-risk asset it is. A look at the data indicates a small portfolio allocation for most investors would be the safest.
-
I'm a Federal Benefits Pro: I Answer These 2 Questions a LotMany federal employees ask about rolling a TSP into an IRA and parsing options for survivor benefits, both especially critical topics.
-
Kiplinger's 2020 Election ForecastPolitics For nearly a century, The Kiplinger Letter has forecasted the outcome of presidential elections to keep readers informed of what's coming and what it means for them. Here's our call for 2020.
-
How the GOP Tax Bill May Affect BusinessesBusiness Costs & Regulation Corporations would enjoy a lower flat tax rate while individual owners of pass-throughs would also see a lower rate, but with more complex terms.
-
The Long Slog in Congress After Comey
Politics Trump's firing of the FBI director ruffled congressional feathers, but not enough to spur an independent investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.
-
Trump’s Tax Reform Plan Faces Tough ChallengesPolitics A one-page outline isn't enough to satisfy a Congress interested in the details — and protecting constituents.
-
Trump's Agenda and ChallengesPolitics What lies ahead for the President-Elect.
-
Clinton on Track to Win 2016 Presidential Election
Politics Trump can win the White House, but faces an uphill climb.
-
New Overtime Rules Will Hit Businesses This YearBusiness Costs & Regulation A change in salary threshold will make more workers eligible for extra pay.
-
Bumpy Road Ahead in 2016 Presidential Race
Politics Trump will get a bounce after the Republican convention, but Clinton is poised to regain ground.
