China's Currency Move Eases Tension
But doing more to raise the yuan's value and rebalance trade could create thousands of American jobs.

China’s announced change in exchange rate policy is just a start, though it does mark an important step in the direction of a more balanced economic relationship with the United States. Even if the same 18% appreciation achieved from 2005 to 2008 -- before the global economic downturn prompted the Chinese government to put a halt to the policy -- were duplicated in the next three years, the imbalance would remain. And that’s both damaging and dangerous.
China’s undervalued yuan clearly provides the country with a huge competitive advantage. In a 2007 survey of estimates, all but one of 18 studies concluded that the yuan was undervalued vis-à-vis the U.S. dollar, with an average undervaluation of 40%. More recently, the conventional wisdom puts the yuan’s undervaluation today at 24% to 30%.
Regarding merchandise trade, America ran a $231-billion deficit with China over the past year, accounting for 42% of the $547-billion U.S. total. But the impact of China’s exchange rate policies stretches beyond that, because some of China’s neighbors manage their exchange rates to preserve their competitiveness against the Asian giant’s exports in third markets. So their currencies are also undervalued relative to the American greenback. U.S. trade with Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia and China together accounts for fully half of America’s trade deficit.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
The undervaluation isn’t, of course, entirely a bad thing. After all, cheap goods from China lower living costs here, stretching the value of the dollar. But there are reasons China’s undervalued currency is especially problematic right now.
Cheap goods aren’t a big priority for America at present. Thanks to the resource slack created by the Great Recession, inflation is already low, at around 1%, and further declines wouldn’t be especially welcome.
And the trade deficit with China directly translates into lost output and jobs. When unemployment was under 5%, that wasn’t a pressing issue. Now that the jobless rate is closer to 10%, it’s a political and economic albatross. Given a rule of thumb that says each $1 billion of net exports creates 7,000 jobs, trimming the Chinese trade deficit in half would create roughly 800,000 desperately needed jobs.
This brings us to the second aspect of the unbalanced economic relationship with China: investment. In the absence of Chinese intervention, the Asian country’s trade surplus with the U.S. would naturally lift the value of the yuan as U.S. demand for yuan-based merchandise vastly exceeded Chinese demand for dollar-based merchandise. Since that’s antithetical to China’s export-based economic growth strategy, Beijing limits the yuan’s appreciation by recycling its trade dollars back into U.S.-denominated assets, especially Treasury securities. This, too, isn’t altogether bad; it helps keep our interest rates low and buoys the sluggish U.S. economy.
U.S. dependence on large, persistent investment flows from China is scary, however. Any abrupt cessation of Chinese investment (if not offset by larger inflows from elsewhere) would drive up U.S. interest rates, presenting a menacing economic risk. Just as Greece had to scramble to appease foreign investors losing their confidence, so, too, might the U.S. become beholden to China if it quit the market for U.S. assets.
Fortunately, the risk isn’t entirely one-sided. China owns more U.S. securities than any other foreign investor, and it has an enormous pile of foreign exchange reserves to show for it. The precise value of dollar based assets in this stash isn’t known for sure, but it’s easily around $2 trillion. So China has a huge stake in the American economy, and any fiscal problems of ours are major concerns of theirs. That’s why, for example, the People’s Bank of China was among the first phone calls then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson made when nationalizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In addition, any appreciation of the yuan also translates into direct losses on China’s portfolio of U.S.-denominated assets. A 20% appreciation translates into a loss of $400 billion, for example.
The good news is that China has nothing to gain and a lot to lose in this complex and unhealthy relationship -- a relationship sometimes described as MAD, an acronym borrowed from the nuclear doctrine of mutually assured destruction. The blowback from an “attack” by one on the other would be severe enough to act as a deterrent.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

-
Amazon Ends Free Shipping Benefit Sharing with Non-Household Members
Starting October 1, Prime members will no longer be able to share shipping perks with those outside their household.
-
Big Tech Names Rise Above Broad Weakness: Stock Market Today
Some familiar names enjoyed solid rallies on the resolution of outstanding questions, but macro uncertainty hangs over the broader market.
-
AI Start-ups Are Rolling in Cash
The Kiplinger Letter Investors are plowing record sums of money into artificial intelligence start-ups. Even as sales grow swiftly, losses are piling up for AI firms.
-
What is AI Worth to the Economy?
The Letter Spending on AI is already boosting GDP, but will the massive outlays being poured into the technology deliver faster economic growth in the long run?
-
Kiplinger Special Report: Business Costs for 2026
Economic Forecasts Fresh forecasts for 2026, to help you plan ahead and prepare a budget on a range of business costs, from Kiplinger's Letters team.
-
How to Adopt AI and Keep Employees Happy
The Kiplinger Letter As business adoption of AI picks up, employee morale could take a hit. But there are ways to avoid an AI backlash.
-
AI-Powered Smart Glasses Set to Make a Bigger Splash
The Kiplinger Letter Meta leads the way with its sleek, fashionable smart glasses, but Apple reportedly plans to join the fray by late 2026. Improved AI will lure more customers.
-
Breaking China's Stranglehold on Rare Earth Elements
The Letter China is using its near-monopoly on critical minerals to win trade concessions. Can the U.S. find alternate supplies?
-
What New Tariffs Mean for Car Shoppers
The Kiplinger Letter Car deals are growing scarcer. Meanwhile, tax credits for EVs are on the way out, but tax breaks for car loans are coming.
-
AI’s Rapid Rise Sparks New Cyber Threats
The Kiplinger Letter Cybersecurity professionals are racing to ward off AI threats while also using AI tools to shore up defenses.