Give a Gift

Real Estate

Glimmers of Light on Home Prices

Sales are ticking up, but don’t expect prices to follow until the middle of the year.

By Pat Mertz Esswein, Associate Editor

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, January 2010
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Advertisement

In the second half of 2009, the housing market seemed to catch its breath after struggling to recover from the most severe downturn since the Great Depression. The first-time home buyer’s tax credit and low mortgage rates lured buyers who’d been dithering and helped move the glut of foreclosures that have been dragging down home values. Sales began ticking up, and home prices stabilized after a three-year downward spiral.

But the correction isn’t over yet. Credit is still tight, unemployment is high, and more foreclosures are coming. Even with the extension and expansion of the tax credit to include move-up buyers and an upward trend in sales, home prices will continue to edge lower through next spring. The U.S. housing market won’t begin to look healthy again until at least 2011.

Related Links


The price picture

From the beginning of the downturn in mid 2006 to June 30, 2009, the median price of an existing home nationwide fell by 30%, or 11% annualized, according to Fiserv Lending Solutions. The median home now sells for $174,000-about what it sold for in 2003. Among the cities that Fiserv tracks, Detroit-victim of subprime lending and sky-high unemployment-suffered the most, with an annualized decline of 22% in its median home price over three years and a 33% plunge in the year that ended June 30. Detroit was followed closely by Las Vegas, Phoenix, Merced (Cal.), Miami, and Modesto (Cal.)-all at the epicenter of the boom-bust quake.

Over the past year, prices dropped 15% across the U.S. and rose in only two cities: Clarksville, Tenn. (up 1%), and Johnson City, Tenn. (2%), reflecting demand for homes by an influx of retirees to the Blue Ridge Mountains.

But between the first and second quarters of 2009, the nationwide median home price rose slightly, by 1.4%, according to Fiserv. That’s the first such increase since 2006 and, says Fiserv chief economist David Stiff, “the first good news we’ve had.” But Stiff is quick to warn that one grace note doesn’t make a tune.

Given that prices tend to stabilize about a year after sales begin to recover, Fiserv expects prices to bottom out in mid 2010. It forecasts that the median home price will have fallen by 7.5% in 2009 and will drop another 9.2% in 2010, to a level not seen since 2001.

Sales have been picking up steam since April, and in July, they increased year over year for the first time since November 2005. The increase was driven by first-time buyers seeking to capture the $8,000 tax credit and by bargain hunters and investors lured by discounts of 15% to 20% from market value on foreclosed homes and short sales (properties sold for less than what was owed on the mortgage). Federal intervention in the credit markets helped shore up mortgage lending at superlow rates.

In its most recent report, the National Association of Realtors said that sales of existing homes (including single-family houses, townhouses, condos and co-ops) rose 9.4% in September compared with the year before, with the strongest rebound in the Northeast (12%) and the weakest in the West (6%). Inventory fell by 15% from the year before, to just under eight months’ supply (the time it would take to sell the current inventory at the current pace of sales). That’s the lowest level in two and a half years, but above the four- to six-month supply that indicates a market balanced between buyers and sellers. The condo market still staggered under an 11-month supply.

Introductory Offer: Get Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine for $12. Save 75%!

DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (8)

Posted by: Don at 12/15/2009 03:08:00 PM

In my area the local taxing bodies claim that home values are higher than ever and raised everyone's assessment about 7% this year even though there is no evidence to support it. How can this be? It all started two years ago when they saw the recession coming and hurriedly rammed through two very huge building projects. Within two months thousands of local workers began losing their jobs. That's OK because our local politicians keep telling us on paid TV commercials, It's better here. Then the city, county and school districts had to admit that they are very deep in red ink. But that's OK, It's better here. Not only are our assessments already higher but the local taxing bodies are now raising their taxing rates by up to 8%. That's OK, It's better here. With unemployment well over 10% and most of our skilled younger people moving away to find work, that's OK. It's better here. So when I read national stories like this article about housing sales and prices, I have to wonder.

Posted by: Steve at 12/16/2009 11:10:06 PM

Hmmm. It doesn't really matter if the prices drop much more now or even go up. The banks aren't lending money to anyone without 40% down payment and a FICO score of over 775. Even though "our" government bailed them out. And banks have been too stupid in handling foreclosures so it just prolongs our pain. But the banks are making money! High fees, hidden fees, fees to transfer your own money from your checking to your savings so you don't get charged all the overdraft junk fees.

Posted by: Pat Esswein at 12/18/2009 01:01:25 PM

Hi, Don, I'm the author of this article. I don't know where you live, but is it possible that your county reassessed home values just prior to home prices falling steeply and failed to capture that decline? Also, in California, a home's assessed value is based on its purchase price, plus increases of up to 2% annually. The house isn't revalued until it's sold again. To capture the price plunge of the past few years, homeowners must file an appeal and prove that their home's assessed value exceeds its market value. Perhaps you could appeal, too. Just be prepared to prove that your home's market value is less than its assessed value. For more information, see my article, "Lower your property-tax bill." Regards, Pat Mertz Esswein, Associate Editor, Real Estate, Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine

Posted by: Ross at 12/22/2009 12:50:50 PM

Your article says that the avg. Santa Barbara home has dropped to around $267,000. Are you kidding me? I invite you to come to Santa Barbara and try to find just one!, one!, 1 bd./1 bath condo located next to Hwy.101 for under $300,000. They do not exist. Ross, Santa Barbara, CA

Posted by: Kit at 12/23/2009 06:52:45 PM

@ Steve - which bank is requiring a 40% down payment for a mortgage loan? I have not heard of this. I know that for raw land there is an LTV requirement of about 60% but not for SFR's.

Posted by: john at 12/26/2009 02:48:07 PM

the banks are still lending to 100 percent 200,000 home govt federal housing administration FHA loan that is where 60 percent of loans are being done...Housing is being artifically held up by socialist govt...govt is even eliminating loan balances on people going into socilist jobs teachers police fireman etc I appreciate teachers fireman police however they have way too big of pension plans that are guaranteed...University of southern california as example pay 40k per yr for school on loans smake the minimum payment for 10 yrs and after 10 yrs you owe nothing...then just have the tax payers pay for it after ten yrs of making minimum payments...home loans should be minimum 20 percent down and at least 10 yr fixed loans...we borrow money monthly from chinese so that we can overspend... Pathetic...And this socilist health insurance is going to cost at least double what they say...

Posted by: Karen at 01/02/2010 10:13:26 AM

We are in the position of the sellers that reduced their price $ 300,000 so the Powells could buy a house in the Minneapolis area that otherwise they would not have been able to afford. We have moved to a higher priced market (Boston) and needed the equity on our Minneapolis house to buy a house half the size at twice the price. While we are glad the Powells have gotten such a bargin, we are feeling the pain on the other end of what to do when we have lost a large chunk of our equity. Even though my husband and I have credit scores over 800, the Boston banks refused our loan application because we only had 20% down. The seller in Boston refused to lower his price.We are now renting! Our move was prompted by my husband finding his "dream job" in Boston but it has left us feeling impoverished.

Posted by: Pat Esswein at 01/13/2010 02:54:38 PM

Hi, Karen, I'm the author of this article. Thanks for sharing your story. I can see why you feel disappointed. I'm curious: Did you try any other lenders? Are you renting a home equivalent to what you'd like to have bought? Is rent less than you might have paid monthly on a mortgage? If renting gives you any savings over buying, perhaps you can use this time to strengthen your financial position by using the difference to pay down any debt and save and invest the difference toward a future down payment. Regards, Pat



Featured Videos From Kiplinger





Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

facebook
twitter
RSS