Real Estate

Sell the House and Invest the Profits?

A couple think about cashing out to bolster their retirement kitty.

By Jeffrey R. Kosnett, Senior Editor

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, March 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

The housing slump is starting to unnerve people with oodles of home equity. John and Michelle Potocko are sitting on as much as $500,000 of it in their large home in Clarksville, Md. They have good jobs -- Michelle, 46, works in telecommunications marketing and John, 56, is a government contractor -- and no other debt. Yet they're contemplating downsizing to a townhouse.

The couple, who met when they were both professional actors, bought their house new in 1999 for $419,000. It is now worth around $850,000 to $900,000 and they owe $300,000 on the mortgage. They would presumably pay cash for the townhouse and use the rest of the gain to bolster their savings.

Their array of IRAs, 401(k) plans and assorted stocks and mutual funds is worth about $500,000. Over the years, Michelle says, she and John "made a lot, lost a bunch, got some of it back, and now we're struggling again." She fears that their savings won't last long if she loses her job or if John loses his.

Many people are asking whether they should sell their home and pocket the tax-free gains of up to $500,000 before prices sink even further. Generally, advisers say you should think of your house as shelter rather than as an investment. But housing values have gone up for so long that, even with prices down, millions of families like the Potockos have half of their net worth, if not more, tied up in their home. It wouldn't be prudent to put half of your assets in a single stock. Should the same kind of thinking apply to your house?

A stock can plunge 20% in a day, and the entire market can sink 22% in a year, as happened in 2002. Housing prices are less volatile, but a homebuilder could slash prices on slow-moving new properties, undercutting existing values in the neighborhood. It takes a lot more time and effort to sell a house, though, than to unload a stock, which you can accomplish with a single keystroke.

Touchy markets

If you do sell your house, you'll need a plan for the proceeds. Stocks have been volatile since last summer, and investors are concerned that the economy is tanking. Rather than try to time the market, it's important to know your tolerance for risk, when you'll want to tap your savings and how any new investments will fit with the rest of your portfolio.

Assume the Potockos clear $500,000 from selling their house. If they pay $400,000 for a townhouse nearby, they'll have $100,000 to reinvest immediately. They'll also save $20,000 a year (after taxes) on mortgage payments and lower property taxes, as well as upkeep. If Michelle and John work ten more years (and continue to pay in to their retirement accounts) and generate 8% annual returns overall, they'll have $1.7 million -- enough to retire comfortably.

But for this plan to work, the Potockos will have to reorganize their portfolio. The mutual funds in their retirement plans are fine, but blowups among individual stocks have hurt returns. John and Michelle should dump some of the riskier stocks and rely more on such fine growth funds as Marsico 21st Century. They should also trim their total stock allocation from 90% to 75%. Both moves will help them sleep better.

It's important to remember that selling a house isn't like unloading pesky stocks. Once you've done the deed, it's hard to turn back. And if you make poor investment decisions with your profits, you may end up working until you're 70.

Stumped by your investments? Write to us at portfoliodoc@kiplinger.com.

Get Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine for $12. Save 75%!

Discuss

Reader Comments (7)

Posted by: Mike in TN at 02/21/2008 09:40:41 AM

Your theory at the end won't work. You say they can sell for $500k, pay $400k for the townhome and invest $100k. But earlier in the article, you say they owe $300k on the home. So, if that is the payoff amount and they sell for $500k, they will walk away with $200k+/-. If they pay $400k for the townhome, then they have nothing to invest if they apply the $200k to that purchase. Also, if they wish to downsize, now is a good time to do so. Not so much because they may lose equity if their home value continues to drop (the same could happen with their townhome), but rather because interest rates are still at an all-time low and are likely to rise due to inflation in the near future.

Posted by: Mark at 02/21/2008 11:42:48 AM

Why would anyone pay $400,000 for a nearby townhouse and essentially lock those funds up (earning 0%) rather than get a new mortgage (great rates now, plus tax advantages) and invest their profits? The new townhouse will hopefully appreciate, but will do so whether they put $100K (down pymt) or $400K (payoff) into it. I would invest in add'l real estate with their profits -- pick-up a few rental properties and cashout in about 10-15 years (based on John's age).

Posted by: Editor at 02/21/2008 12:34:25 PM

Mike: The Potocko's house is worth about $850,000 to $900,000 now. So they would clear at least $500,000 after paying off the $300,000 mortgage, realtor's commission and any other costs. That's where the $500,000 equity figure comes from. The math in the article is correct -- sorry for any confusion.

Posted by: John Doe at 02/21/2008 09:44:28 PM

Not sure I agree with the 0% interest. I have an opportunity to pay off my house and I have yet to find an investment that will yield a safe 5.75% equal to my house, and as far as the deduction, it is only approximately equal to your your federal income rate. For example, if your in the 25% range you get back 25 cent for every dollar you pay in interest. 2) if your house was paid off would you borrow against it to invest in the market?

Posted by: John Doe at 02/21/2008 09:47:00 PM

Forgot to mention that if my house was paid off and needed a tax deduction I would purchase a rental property and finance it.

Posted by: Jacqueline M Muollo at 02/22/2008 06:35:24 AM

This is an absolutely crazy idea. Sure they have too much equity in the house and this seems like cash to them. But...it's a house and it's shelter. It provides them with more than equity. To think as your house as an ATM was wrong for a lot of people who took out home equity lines of credit and to think of it as a source of potential investment income is also not a smart move. The value of your house will go through ups and downs and at the end of this real estate debacle it will return and eventually within approximately 10 years begin to go up. These people are young. It makes more sense to stay where they are and just save part of their income. Investing in the market right now is dicey. Any fund or stock is not a good idea. Re-work your existing portfolio to all moderately safe and mixed funds. Then within the after 10 years if you are getting ready to retire, downsize the house and find more safe investments.

Posted by: Streetpunk at 02/22/2008 09:42:22 AM

John Doe, Regarding the rental property: If your AGI is above $150K you can't take any of the losses on it. As it approaches $150K, the losses are phased out.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Turning Allowances Into Savings

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement