Markets
7 Questions You Must Ask Your Financial Adviser
Understanding your financial adviser’s motives, expertise and methods is crucial to managing your wealth.
By Bob Frick, Senior Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance
May 24, 2010
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
Smart patients don’t hesitate to ask their doctors hard questions about treatments, alternatives and prescriptions. So why do so many of us who seek advice about money shy away from asking the hard questions of financial advisers? Maybe because money is such a taboo subject -- after all, survey after survey finds that given a choice to discuss sex or money, more of us feel comfortable with pillow talk.
But understanding your financial adviser’s motives, expertise and methods is crucial to managing your wealth and will certainly help you sleep better during turbulent financial times.
First check an adviser’s qualifications and references. Then ask these seven key questions:
1. Do our goals match? If an adviser works solely or partly on commission, you may have a problem. You can never be sure whether the investments the adviser is buying for your portfolio are the best he can find or the ones that generate the largest fees. When an adviser wants to swap a few mutual funds in and a few out, is he doing so to improve your performance or because he needs to score more commissions to make a car payment?
The simplest way to unite your goals with those of your adviser is to pay a fee tied to the size of your portfolio -- say, 1% of assets per year. When your portfolio goes up, and only when it goes up, so does your adviser’s compensation. To paraphrase poet Robert Frost, your goal should be to align your wealth with his wealth, just as two eyes make one in sight.
Other methods that avoid conflicts of interest are to pay for advice by the plan, by the hour or by an annual retainer. But those don’t provide as much incentive for your adviser as a plan linked to assets does.
2. How much will your services really cost me? Your adviser’s fee is only a part of your costs. If your adviser trades securities often, brokerage commissions can add up. And maybe your adviser likes mutual funds or other investments with high annual expenses. Get an accounting of total annual fees and expenses for the adviser’s typical portfolio. A thrifty adviser can find plenty of cheap mutual funds and exchange-traded funds and won’t trade often, keeping the annual cost of your portfolio to well under 1% of assets (not including the adviser’s fee).
3. How do you measure performance? This is definitely a question to ask upfront. At your annual checkup, your adviser can pull out all kinds of measures to make his performance look better than it really is. Decide what standards you’re going to use before turning over a penny. Be sure to ask current and former clients how their portfolios performed.
Here’s our suggestion: Your portfolio should do at least as well at the market averages. So the portion of your portfolio in big U.S. companies should at least equal the performance of Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index. Likewise, the portions in small-company stocks, foreign stocks, bonds and so on should equal or better their market-average doppelganger. Equaling the averages is a no-brainer -- all your adviser has to do is invest in index funds. In fact, many advisers follow just that strategy. At any rate, studies have shown that your mix of assets is far more important in determining performance than the choice of individual funds or securities.
4. What do you know about me? Many advisers use a “portfolio in a box” approach -- that is, they figure that if you’re of a certain age and generate a certain amount of income, you should hold investments X, Y and Z. But the past decade has taught us that we all come with biases that affect our comfort level with investments and their performance. For example, some of us love risk, while some of us despise it. Plus, we put different priorities on different goals.
A good adviser will ask you a series of questions to divine your attitudes toward risk, different types of investments, your need for security and your priorities. Many will have you fill out questionnaires on these topics, although advisers should combine the surveys with heart-to-heart discussions.
The payoff for spending time on such discussions is a portfolio that reflects those variables.
5. Do you time the market? Most advisers who try to time the market won’t admit to it -- at least not in those words. Timing the market means trying to predict future movements of asset prices and moving money in and out of markets to take advantage of those predictions. Relatively few investors have done so successfully over long periods. If your adviser were one of them, she would probably be running a multibillion-dollar hedge fund.
By asking an adviser about her investment strategy and how it changes with developments in the markets, you’ll discover whether she’s a closet market timer. Watch out for an adviser who says, for example, that she thought foreign stocks were getting pricey so she shifted clients’ money from overseas shares to commodities. Wholesale changes of this sort rarely pay off, and, if they’re done poorly, your portfolio could shrink faster than an igloo on Oahu.
Of course, tweaking is fine. There are many good reasons to change from one fund manager to another, for example. And your adviser may also shift some funds to a new type of asset to increase diversification. Not too many years ago advisers rarely recommended commodity funds or foreign bonds, but today these kinds of investments have become commonplace.
6. Do you take a holistic approach? You may want your adviser just to manage your money. That’s fine. But to really take advantage of a pro’s expertise, you want someone who is versed in estate planning, insurance and a host of other areas that work best when orchestrated together. That includes estate planning, life and long-term-care insurance, and investing for college.
7. How can you help me transition to retirement? Making money grow is just half the challenge. A good adviser should lay out a strategy on how you’ll reduce risk in your portfolio as you approach retirement age, even if retirement is still years away. The adviser should have a plan for setting up various buckets of funds to meet your retirement income needs, including short-term liquid assets for immediate cash; fixed-interest investments, such as CDs or bond ladders, that you can use to replenish your cash bucket as needed and to shield you from having to sell stocks in a down market; and long-term assets invested for growth in a well-diversified portfolio.
Topics:
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy


Reader Comments (8)
Posted by: Corey Steinmetz, CIC at 05/24/2010 12:52:29 PM
Bob, I like your positions on 4,5,6,& 7, and would mostly agree with what you have said. In 7, rather than using a cd or bond ladder, you could also use fixed rate annuities, which can be purchased for 1 to 5 year periods, and beyond, they typically give you better rates than a c.d. and do not have any fluctuation like a bond would. Might consider adding that piece. There are more routes to income at retirement than the "bucket" approace, a widely known tool that can be done in other ways. In point 1 here is my conflict, you can and will find advisors who will take a fee based approach and do nothing in return, take your fees and leave you to the dogs. Many investors are not willing to pay upfront fees to "see what someone can do", they'd rather pay a commission to a broker and gie them a year or two to make things work. In the long run, a one time commission is generally much ower than the on-going fees of a fee based advisor, and there are many advisors, like myslef, who pride themselves on doing what is best for the clients they serve. That will mean making some trades to reflect change in age, status, stiutation, etc..., not for a new commission. Most competent advisors will use funds of the same family for those changes, thereby avoiding a new commission to be generated. If they don't, then yes, you are correct. In point 2, there are many funds with lowe expenses, but as the saying goes, you get what you pay for. I've used some average priced funds for years, and done very well with them, but I've also used some higher expensed funds for foreign exposures, many times you can't get to a good foreign fund without paying a higher exepense. In the long run, it really is about diversity, and sometimes diversity can cost a little more, but the benefit is there for the cost. Broker commissions rarely increase for a higher cost fund, FYI. In point 3, using an index as a guide or investment model is contrary to diversification at it's purest form. Many ETF funds are under scrutiny right now, and most index funds have under performed, making your comments somewhat misleading. A good advisor will know the client, know their tolerances for risk and their goals, and will develop a plan within a family of funds to accomplish those goals. That is how we get paid, and those satisfied referrals are where we grow our businesses. I'd appreciate some good words about advisors, as there are bad in every industry.
Posted by: John at 05/24/2010 07:16:11 PM
If my advisor provided my name (or address, phone number, email, etc.) to a prospective clients to talk to me I would accuse him/her of violation of privacy. So your statement in point #2 "Be sure to ask current and former clients how their portfolios performed" is bad advice. It might even be considered illegal by some.
Posted by: Martha M. at 05/25/2010 02:02:51 AM
Please explain about IRAs.
Posted by: Brian at 05/25/2010 04:57:01 PM
I agree 100% with the author that it's appropriate to ask a prospective advisor for a few current clients you can speak with. Understand though, that he/she will give you names of the happy clients, but still worth the effort. In fact, I would take it a step further and suggest if a prospective advisor hides behind "privacy," don't give him/her your business. Good, ethical advisors have happy clients who are willing to talk to their prospective clients. Being a good,ethical advisor ALSO means they ask the clients permission before giving out contact information to prospects (OF COURSE...isn't that assumed?). Fee-ONLY planners are the best way to go. Ask a your fee-BASED planner if you should liquidate $500k to pay off your mortgage and suddenly he has a conflict of interest.
Posted by: Bob Frick at 05/26/2010 09:06:26 AM
Hello, this is Bob Frick, the writer of this story. I'd like to address the interesting debate here about speaking to an adviser's clients. I assume that the adviser will check with clients before giving out any names -- I can't imagine an adviser would do otherwise. And, of course, the clients they give you will be the happy ones, and certainly not the ones who fired the adviser. However, you can get two pieces of useful information from clients: First, you'll get a picture of how the adviser handles clients. Style is very important, and the client you speak with may like the adviser's approach, and you may not. Second, ask the client for names of dissatisfied clients, or other clients. Now you've skipped the adviser filter. When I report a story, I often ask sources for people who disagree with their position, and usually they are happy to provide them. Hope this helps, and thanks for your comments.
Posted by: A Financial Advisor at 05/30/2010 05:11:05 PM
Let me clarify something regarding speaking to an advisor's clients. A Financial Advisor is EXPRESSY FORBID to give out the names and/or numbers of his or her clients. It is forbidden under ANY circumstance, even with the client's permission. FINRA sets this rule and every licensed securities representative must adhere to it. I don't remember the code number offhand but if you contact FINRA, I'm sure they'll find it for you.
Posted by: Brian at 06/02/2010 04:34:16 PM
Behold the power of not believing everything A Financial Advisor tells you and doing 2 minutes worth of your own homework. From FINRA website titled "SELECTING INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS": "You might also want to ASK WHETHER THE PROFESSIONAL WILL PROVIDE A LIST OF CLIENTS YOU CAN CONTACT AS REFERENCES. However, the professional is not required to do so and there may be company policies about privacy issues that prevent him or her from sharing this information." {Kiplinger won't let me paste the link, so here is the thread} FINRA -> Investors -> Smart Investing -> Getting Started -> Selecting An Investment Professional Just turn on your BS filter and you too can spot a turkey? Gobble Gobble. Happy advisor hunting all.
Posted by: Steve Juetten, CFP® at 07/08/2010 04:42:26 PM
I am a fee-only financial adviser in the State of Washington and read the article and comments with great interest. When I got to the comment about FINRA, I was amazed as well and glad that someone took the time to correct this misinformation. And to Bob's comment, when prospective clients ask me for referrals, I do exactly what he says. That is, I tell the prospective client that I'm happy to provide referrals but first have to ask permission first. I also tell them I'm giving them names of long-standing clients. If the prospective client asks for the names of anyone who I no longer work with, I provide those too. My perspective is that if I want to be trusted adviser, I need to act trustworthy from the first meeting and throughout the relationship. Providing referrals is part of earning that trust for some people.