How Obama's Tax Plan Could Affect You

The President-elect will likely demand quick action on a new round for stimulus checks, tax reflief for the jobless, and easier access to retirement plans for emergency cash.

By Mary Beth Franklin, Senior Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance

November 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Even before President-elect Barack Obama is sworn in as the 44th president of the United States in January, his transition team and congressional leaders will be working on ways to stimulate the economy and provide taxpayers with some relief to cope with the most challenging economy in more than 80 years.

With Democrats controlling both houses of Congress, lawmakers are likely to approve a new round of economic-stimulus checks during an expected lame-duck session, says Clint Stretch, director of tax policy for Deloitte Tax. But more-comprehensive changes , such as boosting income-tax and capital-gains rates on the wealthiest Americans, may have to wait until the economy strengthens, Stretch predicts. Growing federal budget deficits will make it difficult to fulfill many expensive campaign promises. And Congress will have significant influence over whatever proposals are ultimately enacted into law.

Lame-Duck Priorities

No one knows for sure what might happen during a post-election session of Congress, but there are three likely targets for quick action: a new round of stimulus checks for taxpayers to grease the wheels of the economy, a move to suspend income taxes for the growing number of Americans collecting unemployment benefits, and temporary changes in tax rules affecting retirement-plan distributions.

During his campaign, Obama proposed adding a refundable tax credit of up to $500 per person ($1,000 per family) to offset payroll taxes on the first $8,100 of wages. That credit could be made retroactive to January 1, 2008, and is a likely vehicle to deliver another round of economic-stimulus checks, says Stretch.

RELATED LINKS
Obama’s 10 Big Challenges
Blog: Now What? How Obama Will Govern
Health-Care Reform Takes Center Stage

Temporarily eliminating the annual required minimum distributions from IRAs for Americans 70 and older was one of the few proposals on which Obama and Republican presidential candidate John McCain agreed. Both said it was unfair to force seniors to sell investments in the current bear market in order to fulfill their annual distribution requirements by December 31. Although suspending mandatory withdrawals would allow some investors to avoid selling stocks hammered by the market, it would help only those people who could afford to skip their annual required minimum distribution. Seniors who need the money will have to tap their IRAs regardless of whether they are required to do so. Obama has suggested that withdrawals up to the amount that would normally be required under minimum-distribution rules should be tax-free.

Obama also proposed that workers, many of whom are grappling with job losses and home foreclosures, be allowed to tap up to $10,000 of savings in their 401(k) or similar workplace-based retirement plan penalty-free in 2008 and 2009. Withdrawals would still be subject to the usual federal and state income taxes. Under current law, workers can borrow up to half of the balance in their 401(k) or similar workplace-based retirement plan up to $50,000. In some cases, they can qualify for a hardship withdrawal, subject to taxes and early-distribution penalties. You can't borrow from an IRA, but you can take early withdrawals that will be taxed and penalized. Roth IRA contributions (but not earnings) can be withdrawn any time tax-free and penalty-free.

Discuss

Reader Comments (19)

Posted by: Jasmine at 11/05/2008 11:25:55 AM

YYYYEEAAAAHHHH! FOR OBAMA

Posted by: Chrissy at 11/05/2008 11:55:43 AM

I believe the 250,000 threshold is too low. There is a giant difference from someone making $250,000 per year to that of someone making $10,000,000 a year. Also, I knowand understand the Laffer Graph regarding income vs. taxes paid. Wealthy people can decide when they pay taxes. If they don't like how high the tax rate is, they can delay paying themselves or receiving capital gains until the rate is lower. More taxes are not generated by increasing the rate. In knowing that my rate will be higher, I have cut back on a lot of my luxuries, which affects others: dining out, vacations, shopping, movies, getting my house cleaned... If I have to reduce my budget by 5%- it is felt by everyone I no longer employ.

Posted by: S Knight at 11/05/2008 12:24:52 PM

Is he going to cut spending to pay for all of his tax cuts?

Posted by: Roger at 11/05/2008 12:25:04 PM

...This guy and liberal left wing will spend us into an abyss that will be an anchor on us for generations. Socialism does not work.

Posted by: reader at 11/05/2008 01:47:59 PM

I will believe it when I see it.

Posted by: dan stark at 11/05/2008 02:01:15 PM

God help us all

Posted by: Warden at 11/05/2008 02:20:35 PM

Anyone who expects a tax cut under Uhhhbama is a fool. He's already promised more than $1 trillion in goodies that he can't pay for. I wonder how happy all these voters will be when their energy costs double or triple after Uhhhbama forces us away from coal AS HE PROMISED.

Posted by: LindaM at 11/05/2008 03:22:19 PM

Holy cats, Jasmine! How can you possibly cheer for more government? Social security will not be around forever and Obama wants to nationalize our 401ks as well! I think a lot of people voted for what they THINK he can do for them instead of the good of the country...

Posted by: camino kid at 11/05/2008 08:13:40 PM

he needs to eliminate all taxes we pay on social security benifits. Just because I have income off my investments my social security bennies do not need to be penalized by being taxed.

Posted by: athomeintexas at 11/05/2008 11:33:29 PM

Pray for him to have clear thoughts and actions and quick ones. What are they going to do with all those unemployed millitary people when they get home? Wont that add to the unemployment problem? What about allowing us to invest our own money from social security? Why not allow us to short sale our homes and let us also write off the losses, We lost our butts in the real estate crisis, not just the banks, why do banks get to write off losses and we have to pay them back sounds like a double whammy to me?

Posted by: Chris at 11/05/2008 11:59:56 PM

The ESTATE TAX - The BIGGEST TRAVESTY in American history. The estate was taxed originally and then they tax it again at nearly 50% when the person dies. WOW is all I have to say. Elect the first person to drop this tax.

Posted by: tallman 58r at 11/06/2008 07:40:49 AM

-NOTHING GOING TO CHANGE, ITS JUST GOING TO GET WORSE.

Posted by: Phillyl at 11/06/2008 09:58:53 AM

His tax plan is penalizing (for) married filing jointly. If the individual limit is $200K then married filing jointly should be $400k. My husband & I have "struggled" for 34 years to build a small business, pay for college, & save for retirement. We have always lived modestly, in the same home we purchased 30 years ago for $75k. Our 401K has lost 1/3 of it's value & we are now in our 50's. We are not "rich".

Posted by: JD at 11/06/2008 03:30:03 PM

I still don't see how Obama can justify a "windfall profits tax" on oil companies. As a percentage of revenue, oil company profits are not high. It is very mathematically unsound to say that a raw number should be the limit on a company's profit without regard for company size. If a one-man operation makes $900 million/quarter, should it be exempt from windfall taxes while oil companies pay? No one man is getting nearly so rich in oil.

Posted by: Mialyn2 at 11/06/2008 09:22:14 PM

I am just 1 of many older Americans, praying they don't take our Social Security and Medicare from us, am 75 years old. Too old to work because of health problems. I am just a old lady asking and praying we still have that little amount of money to carry us through in our older days. TY for listening , God bless America Mia

Posted by: George at 11/06/2008 09:39:47 PM

It's my understanding that 40% of Americans do not pay any income tax. How, then, is it possible to give a tax cut to 95% of Americans?

Posted by: Brian at 11/07/2008 12:47:23 PM

I agree, something must be done to eliminate this estate tax. My parents dreamed of handing over peace of mind to the next generation when they passed. With the increase of job losses and uncertainty of the economic future, the inheritance is the only peace of mind that some have. The tax is unfair.

Posted by: Fred at 11/07/2008 05:51:45 PM

People wake up I work for a large company, They dont pay winfall taxes. They increase the cost of their benefits on their employees and raise the rates on the goods they provide. End result middle class person pays more for those goods thus paying the windfall taxes for the company...

Posted by: sam at 11/17/2008 08:09:14 PM

Bottom up economy is smart. Look, I understand if you're rich ... or wealthy, you've worked hard to get there and now you feel you have to share with the "poor" or whatever ... much like Robbin Hood. But here's the deal. Top to bottom economy hasn't worked. Greed is greed, simply put. There are more people working just as hard as most of you who have struck it big and they just cannot lift themselves from their sticky situations ... NO MATTER HOW HARD THEY WORK ... which is, respectively, probably harder than those who are "bawlin'". Obama's a smart man. I'm confident he'll do better than 10 McCains could ever attempt to be because Obama understands that the majority of America is struggling. I'm sorry guys, but if you're rich, you're a minority. And America runs on its everyday men.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Extra Cash for the Holidays

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement