On Dec. 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law H.R. 1, or The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) — the first major tax reform since 1986. With 2017's tax season wrapping up, now is a good time for Americans to see how the TCJA will affect their tax situation going forward.
The Impact of Increasing the Standard Deduction – The Diminishing Value of Itemized Deductions
Craig and Mary Smith
- Married with no children
- Live in Columbia, Missouri
- Household income of $115,000
- Own a home with a $200,000 mortgage and pay about $7,500 per year in interest
- They make deductible annual contributions to a local charity of $2,000 a year
| Header Cell - Column 0 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages/ Adjusted Gross Income | $115,000 | $115,000 |
| Deduction | $16,479 (Itemized) | $24,000 (Standard) |
| Personal Exemptions | $8,100 (2x) | N/A |
| Taxable Income | $90,421 | $91,000 |
| Row 4 - Cell 0 | Row 4 - Cell 1 | Row 4 - Cell 2 |
| Federal Tax | $14,084 | $11,899 |
| State Tax (MO) | $4,579 | $5,059 |
| Marginal Tax Bracket (Federal/State) | 25%/6% | 22%/6% |
Bottom line: Due to the substantial increase of Standard Deductions, Craig and Mary will not be able to itemize deductions, which they previously used for the 2017 tax year, reducing the value of these deductions.
The Diminishing Value of Itemized Deductions
In 2017, the Smiths itemized their deductions because they exceeded the standard deduction amount available in 2017, which was $12,700. The Smiths’ itemized deductions consisted of the following:
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
| Itemized Deductions | Header Cell - Column 1 |
|---|---|
| State Income Taxes (Wages) | $4,579 |
| Mortgage Interest | $7,500 |
| Property Taxes | $2,400 |
| Charitable Contributions | $2,000 |
| Total | $16,479 |
Due to the increase of the standard deduction to $24,000 for those who are married and file jointly, the Smiths will use the standard deduction amount, since it is greater than the their total itemized deductions. As a result, the deductions they received for items such as mortgage interest and property taxes will not be as valuable for the Smiths. Finally, would the Smiths still make charitable contributions, considering there is no tax benefit for them?
Summary
This example reflects the concerns that real estate professionals and charities have about the new tax act. If fewer people itemize their deductions, which will likely be the case with the increase of the standard deduction, will individuals still purchase homes or give to charities, since there may no longer be a tax incentive to do so?
High-Income Married Couple – Impact of State and Local Income Tax Limitation
Richard and Karen Douglas
- Married with two dependent children
- Live in San Francisco, California
- Their adjusted gross income is $1 million
- They pay $40,000 annually in mortgage interest and $20,000 in property taxes
- They also make annual charitable contributions of $30,000 per year
| Header Cell - Column 0 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages/ Adjusted Gross Income | $1,000,000 | $1,000,000 |
| Deduction (Itemized) | $159,066 | $80,000 |
| Personal Exemptions | $0 | N/A |
| Taxable Income | $840,934 | $920,000 |
| Row 4 - Cell 0 | Row 4 - Cell 1 | Row 4 - Cell 2 |
| Federal Tax | $277,791 | $279,329 |
| State Tax (CA) | $89,652 | $89,253 |
| Marginal Tax Bracket (Federal/State) | 39.6%/11.3% | 37%/11.3% |
| Effective Marginal Tax Rate on next $1000 (Fed/St) | 41.7%/12% | 37.9%/12% |
Bottom line: Even with the loss of over $79,066 in itemized deductions in 2018 due in part to the capping of state and local income tax deductions to $10,000 under the new law, the Douglases’ federal taxes increase only slightly, by about $1,538. This may be surprising given the amount of deductions lost but this is balanced out by the other favorable aspects of the law (including the lower tax rates)
Overview of 2017 Taxes – Non- capping of State and Local Income Taxes (SALT) & Phase Out of Personal Exemptions
For 2017, the Douglases’ itemized deductions would be $159,066 and are broken down as follows:
| Itemized Deductions | Header Cell - Column 1 |
|---|---|
| State Income Taxes (Wages) | $89,652 |
| Mortgage Interest | $40,000 |
| Property Taxes | $20,000 |
| Charitable Contributions | $30,000 |
| Total | $179,652 |
| Deduction Available (Pease Limitation) | $159,066 |
Under the previous law, the Douglases would be able to apply the full amount that they paid for state and local income taxes, including property taxes, to determine their itemized deduction amounts. In 2017, if taxpayers’ adjusted gross income exceeds certain levels ($261,500 for single filers and $313,800 for those who are married and filing jointly) the total amount of itemized deductions that can be used is reduced, also known as the Pease Limitation. Therefore, even though the Douglases’ total itemized deductions are $179,652, their total eligible deduction due to the Pease limitation is capped at $159,066.
The personal exemptions in place for 2017 also phase out at adjusted gross income levels similar to the itemized deduction phase-out, but unlike itemized deductions, personal deductions completely phase out when taxpayers exceed certain adjusted gross income thresholds ($436,300 for those married filing jointly). The Douglases’ adjusted gross income exceeds this amount, and therefore they will not be able to take any personal exemption deductions in 2017. In this case, the Douglases are not negatively impacted by the repeal of the personal exemption under the TCJA since they were not able to utilize personal exemption deductions in the previous year.
Overview of 2018 Taxes – Impact on the Capping of SALT Deductions
One of the major modifications under the TCJA for itemized deductions is the capping of state and local tax (SALT) deductions to $10,000. Since most of the Douglases’ deductions consist of SALT deductions, the amount of itemized deductions they can take for 2018 is significantly decreased, resulting in losing $79,066 in deductions for 2018 tax year.
Even though they lose a large portion of their itemized deductions, the Douglases’ federal tax still goes down slightly due to the lower marginal and effective tax rate for 2018 (37% and 37.9%) vs. 2017 (39.6% and 41.7%).
Summary
The capping of SALT will impact taxpayers in states with high income tax rates, such as California and New York, resulting in those taxpayers losing significant deductions that they were able to take previously. Even though their federal income taxes will generally not change significantly from previous years, they will not receive the same level of savings on their federal taxes than high-income taxpayers who live in states with lower income tax rates will.
-
Stocks Slip to Start Fed Week: Stock Market TodayWhile a rate cut is widely expected this week, uncertainty is building around the Fed's future plans for monetary policy.
-
December Fed Meeting: Live Updates and CommentaryThe December Fed meeting is one of the last key economic events of 2025, with Wall Street closely watching what Chair Powell & Co. will do about interest rates.
-
This Is Why Investors Shouldn't Romanticize BitcoinInvestors should treat bitcoin as the high-risk asset it is. A look at the data indicates a small portfolio allocation for most investors would be the safest.
-
Why Investors Shouldn't Romanticize Bitcoin, From a Financial Planner
Investors should treat bitcoin as the high-risk asset it is. A look at the data indicates a small portfolio allocation for most investors would be the safest.
-
I'm a Financial Pro Focused on Federal Benefits: These Are the 2 Questions I Answer a LotMany federal employees ask about rolling a TSP into an IRA and parsing options for survivor benefits, both especially critical topics.
-
Private Credit Can Be a Resilient Income Strategy for a Volatile Market: A Guide for Financial AdvisersAdvisers are increasingly turning to private credit such as asset-based and real estate lending for elevated yields and protection backed by tangible assets.
-
5 RMD Mistakes That Could Cost You Big-Time: Even Seasoned Retirees Slip UpThe five biggest RMD mistakes retirees make show that tax-smart retirement planning should start well before you hit the age your first RMD is due.
-
I'm a Wealth Adviser: My 4 Guiding Principles Could Help You Plan for Retirement Whether You Have $10,000 or $10 MillionRegardless of your net worth, you deserve a detailed retirement plan backed by a solid understanding of your finances.
-
A Retirement Triple Play: These 3 Tax Breaks Could Lower Your 2026 BillGood news for older taxpayers: Standard deductions are higher, there's a temporary 'bonus deduction' for older folks, and income thresholds have been raised.
-
If You're Retired or Soon-to-Be Retired, You Won't Want to Miss Out on These 3 OBBB Tax BreaksThe OBBB offers some tax advantages that are particularly beneficial for retirees and near-retirees. But they're available for only a limited time.
-
Waiting for Retirement to Give to Charity? Here Are 3 Reasons to Do It Now, From a Financial PlannerYou could wait until retirement, but making charitable giving part of your financial plan now could be far more beneficial for you and the causes you support.
