Advertisement
Markets

Why You Should Buy Stocks Today

Even if you buy at the market’s highest level of the year, a recent study finds that it makes little difference over the long term.

Today’s stock market exhibits plenty of worrisome signs. Stocks of small companies have been sinking, which is often a bad sign for the broader market. Economic growth remains sluggish years after the worst recession since the Great Depression. Vladimir Putin’s mischief ultimately threatens the crucial flow of natural gas from Russia to Western Europe.

 

Why buy now, when the leading market indexes are at record highs? Because a review of recent history shows that the date you pick to invest doesn’t matter that much, even if you invest at the market’s highest level of the year.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Sound crazy? Dan Wiener, editor of The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors, compared the records of two hypothetical investors over the past 30 years. Each started by investing $1,000 in Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index at the end of 1983. (Of course, you can’t buy an index, but you can invest in a low-cost index fund.) Over the subsequent 30 years, each investor put $1,000 annually into the S&P 500. But investor one bought on the last trading day of the year, while investor two bought at the S&P’s highest point each year. In other words, investor two bought on the worst possible day each year.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

Here’s the surprise: At the end of 30 years, investor one had achieved an annualized return of 9.9%, while investor two earned an annualized return of 9.5%. The difference in returns was just 0.4 percentage point per year, on average.

In dollar terms, investor one’s total contributions of $31,000 grew to $177,176, while the additions of the investor with extremely poor timing grew to $169,153. The difference is $8,023. If you’re saving for retirement, you’d hope to invest a lot more than $31,000 over three decades, which would result in a far greater dollar gap.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The difference between the two approaches is significant. But it’s not nearly as much as I would have expected, and it puts some perspective into all the agonizing many of us go through before we put new money to work in stocks.

Of course, if you could accurately time the stock market, you could enrich yourself enormously. Over the past five years through April 30, the S&P 500 returned a sizzling 19.1% annualized. But from December 31, 1999, through April 30, the index returned only 3.7% annualized. So clever market timing would have done far better than buying and holding through this period, which included two vicious bear markets. In the 2000-02 bear market, the S&P plunged 47%, and in 2007-09, it did even worse, sinking 55% (both figures include dividends). Since 1926, large-company stocks have returned an annualized 10.1%, according to Ibbotson Associates—almost three times the return so far this century.

Wiener’s study provides evidence of the merits of dollar-cost averaging—that is, investing a fixed amount at regular intervals, in this case once a year. Indeed, if you had invested $1,000 annually in the S&P on the last day of the year from 1999 through 2013, you would have earned a 7.0% annualized return by April 30—almost double what a one-time, lump sum investment at the start of the century would have produced.

The lesson is clear: Dollar-cost averaging works wonders in volatile markets. But the bigger lesson is even clearer: If you plan to buy stocks this year, go ahead and invest now—even if you think the market may be at its yearly high.

Steve Goldberg is an investment adviser in the Washington, D.C., area.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular

Turning 60 in 2020? Expect Lower Social Security Benefits
Coronavirus and Your Money

Turning 60 in 2020? Expect Lower Social Security Benefits

When you file for Social Security, the amount you receive may be lower.
July 30, 2020
These 2 Words Could Send Your Retirement Money to the Wrong Beneficiary
estate planning

These 2 Words Could Send Your Retirement Money to the Wrong Beneficiary

"Per stirpes" vs. "per capita." Making the wrong choice could cause an estate planning disaster.
July 30, 2020
Second Stimulus Check Update: HEALS Act vs. CARES Act
taxes

Second Stimulus Check Update: HEALS Act vs. CARES Act

When compared to first-round payments, the new Republican stimulus check proposal expands and protects payments for some people, but it shuts the door…
July 29, 2020

Recommended

Stock Market Today 7/31/20: Big Tech Roars, Everyone Else Snores
Markets

Stock Market Today 7/31/20: Big Tech Roars, Everyone Else Snores

Blowout earnings from Apple (AAPL), Amazon.com (AMZN) and Facebook (FB) led another charge by the Nasdaq on Friday.
July 31, 2020
Stock Market Today 7/30/20: Stocks Grind Through a Deluge of News
Markets

Stock Market Today 7/30/20: Stocks Grind Through a Deluge of News

The U.S. suffers its worst GDP drop in history, jobless claims rise and a host of other headlines converged to send the market to mixed results Thursd…
July 30, 2020
U.S. Suffers Worst-Ever 32.9% Annualized GDP Decline in Q2
investing

U.S. Suffers Worst-Ever 32.9% Annualized GDP Decline in Q2

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented collapse in economic activity.
July 30, 2020
Stock Market Today 7/29/20: Big Tech Gets Grilled; Stocks Keep Cooking
Markets

Stock Market Today 7/29/20: Big Tech Gets Grilled; Stocks Keep Cooking

Big Tech stocks pushed higher Wednesday as their CEOs were questioned on Capital Hill, and Kodak's (KODK) incredible ascent continued.
July 29, 2020