Saving for Retirement
It's Never Too Late for a Roth IRA
The prospect of tax-free income in retirement may be too good to pass up, regardless of your age.
By Laura Cohn, Associate Editor
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, July 2010
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
OUR READER
Who: Bill Segur, 60
Where: Wilmington, N.C.
Question: I've finally paid off my mortgage. What should I do with the extra cash?
Now that they've paid off their home loan early, Bill is wondering how he and his wife, Susan, should use the extra $600 a month. Bill is a registered nurse at a hospital and hopes to retire in a few years. He wants to maximize what he and Susan (also an RN) are socking away while they're still working. So their focus is on adding to their savings kitty.
Bill and Susan, 54, figure they have three options. They can increase their contributions to their 403(b) and 401(k) retirement plans, add more to their established traditional IRAs, or start up Roth IRAs. Bill appreciates the tax advantages of a Roth. Although there is no upfront tax break, all withdrawals, including investment earnings, are tax-free once you are 59 1/2 and the account has been open at least five years.
But Bill wonders whether it makes sense for him and Susan to open Roths at their age. "At this late date in our work experiences, do we start new Roth IRAs or add to our traditional accounts?" he asks. The couple have an adequate emergency savings fund and little debt, so they can comfortably bulk up their retirement assets.
Carlo Panaccione, a financial planner in Redwood City, Cal., says that Bill and Susan should pat themselves on the back for paying off their mortgage and committing to put the money toward savings rather than going on a spending spree. "People always say: "If I have money left at the end of the year, I'll save it,'" says Panaccione. "It never happens." Instead, he says, household budgets simply tend to expand whenever a family has money to spare.
Tax advantages. So, to answer Bill's question directly: It's not too late to start a Roth IRA. Because both Bill and Susan are older than 50 and their joint income is less than $167,000, each of them can contribute the maximum $6,000 (including $1,000 in catch-up contributions) to a Roth in 2010.
No matter how long you maintain the retirement account, the tax benefits of a Roth are simply too good to pass up. When you withdraw money from a 401(k) or a regular IRA, it's taxed at your ordinary income-tax rate. With a Roth, you can withdraw cash in retirement without paying Uncle Sam a penny.
And once Bill and Susan retire, they won't need to tap their Roth IRAs right away, given their modest living expenses, their income from workplace retirement plans and Social Security. Because Roths have no required-minimum-distribution rules, you can leave the investments in place as long as you like. "That money can just sit there and cook," says Larry Rosenthal, a financial planner in Manassas, Va. With income-tax rates likely to rise to offset growing budget deficits, the Roth stands out as an increasingly valuable tax shelter. In other words, it's a good way for the couple to diversify their future tax liability.
Roth accounts could also prove helpful to Bill and Susan's estate planning. They can leave the accounts to their two daughters, who would inherit them tax-free.
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy


Reader Comments (5)
Posted by: katie at 06/11/2010 12:16:08 PM
Our Roth account is the best thing that we did before retiring. It's been great for us!!
Posted by: David Walker at 06/12/2010 11:36:53 PM
Our Roth IRA has been great too. We each invested $5,000, 10 years ago and today both of our IRA's are less then half. What would you invest in today that is guaranteed to go UP ?? Think about it carefully !!!!!
Posted by: Bob Giacin at 06/14/2010 08:52:23 AM
The last sentence saying "can leave the accounts to their two daughters, who would inherit them tax free" is misleading and incorrect. Roth IRA accounts are not exempt from inheritance taxes.... period. Only if you were not subject to the inheritance tax, namely your net value of your estate is less than the exemption...$1 million in 2011 (so far) would there be no estate or inheritance taxes. Perhaps this should be clarified in you article.
Posted by: Mary Beth Franklin at 06/14/2010 11:14:03 AM
To Bob Giacin: This is Mary Beth Franklin from Kiplinger. The above story refers to income taxes, not estate or inheritance taxes. The couple could leave their Roth IRA to their daughters (or anyone else) who would inherit them income-tax free. With a traditional IRA, heirs must pay income taxes on all their withdrawals. The majority of Americans never pay federal estate taxes, which are paid by the deceased's estate. A few states have an inheritance tax, paid by the heirs.(Some states also have their own estate tax). There is no federal estate tax in 2010, as Congress allowed it to lapse. The question is whether Congress will reinstate the estate tax at 2009 levels (a $3.5 million exemption) or allow it to revert to $1 million exemption level in 2011.
Posted by: RichSeg. at 06/22/2010 01:01:21 PM
they paid off one house, let's get a second (or maybe just property).there are some incredible deals out there in the real estate market, i personally think that real estate is still a good investment.