Give a Gift

Value Added

Ban Hedge Funds?

I think these barely regulated pools of money deserve far more blame for the financial meltdown than they've received -- and should be regulated out of existence.

By Steven Goldberg, Contributing Columnist, Kiplinger.com

May 19, 2009
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Advertisement

What are they smoking on Wall Street? First the bankers grouse that they need to pay multimillion-dollar bonuses to their employees with taxpayers' money. Now hedge-fund managers express outrage because President Obama slammed them as "speculators" who are "refusing to sacrifice like everyone else" by holding out for more money on their Chrysler bonds as the automaker goes through bankruptcy reorganization.

I don't want to get into a political discussion of how well or how poorly the Obama administration is handling the financial crisis. Plainly, Obama, Bush before him, and Congress under both Democratic and Republican control could have done things better. There's plenty of blame to go around.

But hedge funds, in my opinion, haven't received nearly as much blame as they deserve, both for helping to trigger the financial crisis and, subsequently, for making it much worse than it might otherwise have been.

As we all know now, derivatives were a root cause of the mortgage crisis that led to the housing and financial-system collapse. Wall Street's financial whizzes assembled these esoteric securities from slices of subprime mortgages, and investment bankers then sold them all over the world, often to clueless buyers. Much of the demand for what Warren Buffett years ago termed "financial weapons of mass destruction" came from hedge funds.

Many hedge funds have shut down of late. No complaints about that. But far too many -- with far too much leverage (borrowed money) -- are still making trouble. Hedge funds, as barely regulated pools of money, are, quite simply, dangerous.

A hedge fund amounts to a get-rich-quick scheme for a money manager. The funds typically charge annual fees of 2%, plus 20% of all fund gains. So if, in a good year, the fund grosses 20%, the manager collects a total of 6% of assets -- 2 percentage points for the management fee and 4 points for the performance adjustment. Have a couple of successful years running a big hedge fund and you're super rich -- as in rich-enough-to-buy-your-own-island rich.

To make those huge profits, many hedge funds use leverage, sometimes to the tune of 20 to 1 or even 30 to 1, just like the investment banks that crashed and burned in the past year. That is, for every dollar in assets some hedge funds had, they invested $20 or $30 in borrowed money. Leverage ratios have fallen since the crisis, but they are still too high.

What do hedge funds do with the money? They invest in all corners of the financial markets. The only common strain among most hedge funds is that they're quick on the trigger. When you're heavily leveraged, a margin call is always just a couple of points of losses away. In some corners of the hedge-fund world, "long term" is a day or two.

That means hedge funds remain a huge cause of volatility in the financial markets -- even when you're talking about normally sedate Treasuries, corporate bonds, convertible securities and blue-chip stocks. When the market began to drop in earnest last fall, hedge funds often sold blue chips -- because the managers could sell them without disrupting their prices as much as they would affect the prices of less-liquid investments had they sold them.

Lehman Brothers collapse

It gets worse. Hedge funds have been large buyers and sellers of credit-default swaps. A credit-default swap is best described as a way of buying insurance against your neighbor's house catching on fire.

Think that Bear Stearns or, for that matter, the U.S. Treasury, will default on its bonds? Buy a credit-default swap from your friendly investment banker or insurance company (read American International Group), and it will pay off should the worst happen to your bond. Don't own Bear Stearns or U.S. bonds? No reason you can't buy credit-default swaps and bet that the bond you don't own will collapse.

Credit-default swaps, of course, are hardly the only way to wager that a company won't prosper. You can also sell a stock short. That's a bet on the stock dropping.

Short selling helps keep markets honest, but Bloomberg News uncovered evidence that "naked" shorting, which is illegal, enabled speculators to build enormous bets against Lehman Brothers that probably contributed to the investment bank's collapse last September (naked shorting involves selling a stock without first having borrowed the shares). It was Lehman's bankruptcy that brought on the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Hedge funds are enormous participants in short sales.

Falling stock prices and rising prices for credit-default swaps can spur even the sleepiest credit-rating firm to lower an investment bank's bond rating. Lower credit ratings, in turn, can further drive down the price of a firm's stock -- and drive up the price of its credit-default swaps. That vicious cycle is part of what ultimately drove Lehman and other financial firms out of business.

Whom do hedge funds benefit other than their owners? Very few. Those who are well-connected enough to invest in the few good ones can, indeed, profit from hedge funds -- and diversify their investments. But most of the hedge funds available to common folk aren't worth nearly what they charge.

I don't see why anyone who wants to manage a lot of money for a lot of people can't simply open a mutual fund. No, they wouldn't be able to take 20% of the profits. And no, they wouldn't be able to leverage up their portfolios. Yes, they would have to submit to -- gasp -- regulation.

But the 1% or so in annual fees that mutual funds charge have enriched a lot of money managers and fund executives. And people in the mutual fund business have done pretty well for themselves without helping to bring the global economy to its knees.

Steven T. Goldberg (bio) is an investment adviser.


DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (31)

Posted by: DIANE at 05/19/2009 05:20:36 PM

Great article....you're right on....Greedy politicians let their hedge fund friends get rich at the average working man's expense.

Posted by: mary at 05/19/2009 06:35:58 PM

Thanks for this article, great read. The hedge funds have been bailed out too many times. Greenspan started their bailout (1998)and they have only been emboldened by fed action. They are a classic example of "moral hazard" - until this current episode they have not had to take their losses. First quit bailing them out,then enforce the naked short rule. They would probably disappear on their own.

Posted by: Lauren at 05/19/2009 06:53:30 PM

Thanks for printing the truth. Can we get this on the front page of national newspapers?

Posted by: Ayn Thrope at 05/20/2009 09:51:55 AM

Hedge funds provided much of the liquidity that helped keep the markets from collapsing even further, you know? There are 2 sides to every trade. To assume that hedge funds are the cause of our financial (crisis) is to express a thinly veiled one sided view of history. What about the hedge funds that do not charge a fee? What about the hedge funds that only take a percentage of profits and take NOTHING if the fund doesn't profit? There's a lot of assumptions made, but no facts to back up this story.

Posted by: Louis at 05/20/2009 10:52:39 AM

This is old news. The blame should be directly on the politicians that forced the mortgage lenders to OK sub prime as well as the...rating firms. That is where the blame should be.

Posted by: Kurt at 05/20/2009 11:07:34 AM

GREAT article! We get rid of as many cheats and low-life hedgers by new legislation and new rules plus ENFORCEMENT! What good are rules, etc without enforcement?...

Posted by: doodad at 05/20/2009 12:14:58 PM

Who convinced hedgies to withdraw capital from Bear Stearns prime brokerage accts? Who then handled the orders for naked short sales in Bear Stearns? Who got counter parties to refuse to accept Bear Stearns after destroying their capital position? Who started and perpetuated rumors about Bear and Lehman? Who had former execs in position at NYSE, NASD,SEC and Treasury to ignore the felonies committed? Does the name Goldman Sachs strike a familiar note?

Posted by: mark schug at 05/20/2009 12:28:31 PM

too bad this can't be put on a national T.V. station so everyone can hear it. Hedge fund managers I am told do not have to pay a high income tax on their obscene profits.

Posted by: Madison at 05/20/2009 03:23:59 PM

You're full of it. Just because hedge funds manage money in the markets does not mean that they control the markets. You're giving them too much credit. These Credit Default Swaps were banking products developed by banks and mortgage companies. A ton of hedge funds owned these products (i.e. why more than 10% of the industry is out of business). You're just looking for a scapegoat in all the wrong places.

Posted by: Ben Shoval at 05/20/2009 06:39:31 PM

The notion that "many hedge funds use leverage, sometimes to the tune of 20 to 1 or even 30 to 1" is simply untrue. It is contrary to prime brokerage data and research from the Fed, Bank for International Settlements, and others. The typical fund is leveraged in the 0:1 to 4:1 range. Since the near-debacle of LTCM in 1998, there have been zero margin calls that lead to systemic problems. It may be reasonable to argue that there is an incentive problem between hedge fund managers and their investors, but there is no serious argument that hedge funds have negative effects on the larger landscape. I would love to address each of the author's points, but it's rather difficult to write in this little box.

Posted by: Bob at 05/20/2009 08:27:59 PM

i can't believe this guy is a "investment adivsor." The guy...has few facts to back up his claims....I'm almost laughing at how clueless this (column)...is about what a hedge fund really is and how one operates and functions in the capital markets.

Posted by: Limoman at 05/21/2009 06:20:44 AM

Well, From Little I know of them? I think Hedge Funds Just exposed and accelerated Problem Firms' demise. It can be said, Why is their any kind of leveraging allowed in the first place? Be it a 2-1 shorting or going long? Let alone a higher leverage...pay off. It's like betting on a horse at the race track with 10-1 odds. Of course, do hedge funds expose what Wall Street Is really all about? Gambling... and It's like hiring a professional handicapper to bet on the right horses. Thus the pay offs should be according to the risk. Not this nickel & dime stuff that most Mutual Funds pay, or the stock market with its ave of 9% APY? For using your $ to Make 10x more...I ran a Limo Business for 30+ yrs.. For every Limo I could get a loan to buy, it made me An (average) of $10,000 yr Profit! But I could only get loans to own 10 of them.. and no more..If I could have gotten the Loans to own 100? I could have employed 10x more people and made alot more $ in the process... Making $10k Net Profit on a $50k Cost is = 20% Net Return and I'd been happy to pay even 25% of that to a Creditor..

Posted by: Luscinus at 05/21/2009 07:12:02 AM

Fairly extraordinary to find such an ill-informed rant under the heading 'value-added'. Wonder how his clients did last year ?

Posted by: Alan at 05/21/2009 08:15:21 AM

Hedge funds and derivative products are beyond the comprehension of most investers. What is understandable however is that financial management of itself produces nothing. Goods and the services associated with them -- not financial management -- produce true wealth. All that too many so-called financial managers do is take a slice of the money -- buy or sell -- as it passes through their hands. There would be fewer needs for their "services" if investing was more clear cut and transparent. Fund managers, bankers, etc., have roles -- but not people who seem to do little more than "give and take odds" on the success of people who produce goods and serve customers. I'm probably too simplistic, but watch what this year's crop of new MBAs garner in the job market. Markets may come to value the talents of people who actually know how to create goods and provide them to consumers (vs.) simply telling people what to do with their money.

Posted by: Bryan Goh at 05/21/2009 08:42:17 AM

Who bought bank shares without knowing what banks do? Who bought CDO's without knowing how they work? Who bought RMBS without knowing how they work? Who invested in private equity, real estate, hedge funds, long only equities, commodities, FX, corporate bonds, sovereign bonds, CDS, ABS, structured products, without understanding their markets, their fundamentals, their payoffs under different scenarios, having an exit strategy, having a disaster plan, having the holding power, the stability of funding? Banks, bankers, investment managers do what they are paid to do. Investors didn't do what they were rewarded to do, which is to be diligent and vigilant. When demand for loans, for credit is created by the lender and not the borrower, something fundamental has changed, something fundamental has broken. Homeowners want homes, they need credit to be able to buy them, they turn to mortgage lenders. They want loans, mortgages. Lenders are diligent in their underwriting standards. When CDO investors want CDOs, then CDO managers want (to buy) loans and mortgages and asset backed securities, then ABS managers want (to buy) loans and mortgages (for their ABSs), then lenders want to make loans and mortgages to borrowers. Then that fundamental relationship is broken. Underwriting standards become lax. Agency issues arise since risk is passed on instead of retained by the loan originators. Investors are at the heart of the dislocation, the crisis, the recession. For our ignorance, sloth, negligence, we are paying. We taxpayers and investors, are paying...

Posted by: bd at 05/21/2009 10:33:14 AM

Hedge funds are not all alike - there is extreme diversity. Most hedge funds do not use large amounts of leverage, some do. Many hedge fund managers have skills learned prop trading or otherwise. These are in short supply in the world. Most managers have a substantial portion of their own net worth in the fund. That plus incentive fees tends to get the manager to work for the best interest of the investors. Academic studies show that HF alignment incentives dominate, and that it is rare for managers to take excessive risk in order to take advantage of their implicit call option. Investors are willing to buy the diversification and return benefits they get from hedge funds and can't get from other asset managers. If it's overpriced, then why so popular? Per the next to last paragraph, why should a company who innovates in any field charge more than a commodity price for their product or service? Let's regulate all the car companies and price all cars equal to the Yugo. Let's regulate all computer companies and price all computers at the cost of the cheapest one. Makes sense everywhere, right?

Posted by: Bob at 05/21/2009 12:03:14 PM

While all this is interesting, I still haven't read where anyone comprehends what $4/gal. gas did to the economy while we were supposed to be distracted by the Wall Street fiasco. A huge reorganization and devastation of auto worker and supplier wages and benefits is going on which will have a much longer and more negative effect than anything on Wall Street. That Congress did absolutely nothing about the price of oil last year shows that they were completely complicit in this. Opening a couple offshore drilling areas could have prevented much of the price increases that happened. Higher energy prices are just another tax on the poor and gift to the oil companies. If Congress really cared about CO2 or diminishing oil supplies and had acted in the nation's interest , they would have mandated higher fuel mileage ratings years ago. Why are contacts on Wall Street sacred and those in Detroit must be crushed? Will there ever be an economic recovery or just one final big theft of wealth from what remains of the middle class? If you can't afford $4 gas to get to work, you sure can't afford a new $30,000 hybrid or a $20,000 solar panel or a $15,000 windmill. Banning hedge funds won't do much unless you also ban lobbyists and unlimited terms for Congressmen. Better yet, simply ban political parties and make everyone run as an independent with a limit of two terms in any office.

Posted by: HJ at 05/21/2009 12:56:05 PM

Am I unAmerican to suggest that the Securities and Exchange Commission or a related body(ombudsman),screen and approve any new investment formula(derivitives etc),strategy or product before it is allowed to be traded or sold on any stock exchange?

Posted by: LP at 05/21/2009 08:32:16 PM

I agree with you on the hedge funds not being blamed enough for the crisis. Also these are the same ones driving up the price of oil and gasoline.

Posted by: Knowledgeable Hedgie at 05/21/2009 10:43:32 PM

You're so misinformed it's ridiculous. The Republican Congress and Bush administration have more culpability in this crisis than hedge funds ever will have. Do us a favor and learn about the topic you're going to post about. Driving traffic to your site by misinforming the uninformed everyday investor...is pretty low.

Posted by: Mike at 05/21/2009 11:58:15 PM

Steven... Your uneducated and incorrect view of hedge funds role in the crisis is laughable. Take a deep breath, put aside your jealousy and educate yourself before writing such harmful words...

Posted by: Mark at 05/22/2009 11:17:30 AM

The next obvious step after banning hedge funds is to ban stock sales of course! :/ Google the excellent article written by Benjamin N Dover III to see my point.

Posted by: jesterboomer at 05/22/2009 12:01:42 PM

Hedge funds are essentially parasitic in nature. In good years they 'take' a fraction of the investors 'profit' and in bad years they give back at best nothing or, at worst, continue to charge fees. Assuming that hedge funds are good at what they do, the real losers are all other investors. I suspect if short sales were banned, hedge funds and their fees would mostly cease to exist. I would ban all short sales.

Posted by: JR Cash at 05/22/2009 01:01:08 PM

"Funds available to common folk?!"... Hedge funds are NOT for common folk, hence the income and net worth restrictions to get in. Most SEC enforcement focus on the industry is to prevent just that kind of mom 'n pop investor getting their feet wet. And yes, managers have made substantial sums in mutual funds... and some guys run delis, too, don't they? And to argue that there's virtually no regulation in the industry is either ignorance on your part or proof of intent to deceive your readers....There's a ton of existing regulation and red tape that frankly didn't prevent anything. Regulate the industry into extinction, you say? Oh, I'm sure Wall Street and Greenwich aren't capable of devising equal industries around your 'regulation'. I wish we'd 'regulate' bad columnists out of existence...All this really thin reasoning on your part just fuels the populist, "let's get 'em" schlock...Know your subject pre-diatribe, next time.

Posted by: Joe Leandri at 05/22/2009 03:49:10 PM

Mr. Steven Goldberg's article "Ban on Hedge" funds is right on message. With cheap and an abundant money supply allowing financiers to be speculative, profit taking could be done in a day, or in many cases, huge losses incurred. I'll go one step further than Mr. Goldberg; place a ban on hedge funds, derivatives, and credit-default swaps. Business Week is reporting that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is proposing reigning in the pay of investment bankers, traders, and other financial players. “Financial services executives have had every incentive – through rich option plans, bonuses, and other compensation – to take the maximum risk for the maximum profit, whatever the long term consequences. These practices (and products) contributed to the biggest Wall Street crisis in decades.”

Posted by: Charlie Faux at 05/24/2009 10:54:55 AM

You have very little understanding of the crisis.

Posted by: allan at 05/24/2009 06:54:25 PM

When I buy a stock for the long term I then place a limit sell order for twice the price I paid on it. This prevents my BKR from loaning out my shares against my long position. I love the way BKRs make $$ loaning out borrowed shrs. If every one did this & the naked short selling rules were enforced we would not have to worry about SHORTY or the HEDGE FUNDS.

Posted by: Chris at 05/26/2009 08:52:32 AM

It's quite clear that (Steve Goldberg) has no clue about hedge funds and how they operate. Steve, feel free to reach out to me if you want a real education on alternative investing, otherwise do your homework before you spew garbage like this.

Posted by: Richard Whaley at 06/08/2009 05:20:00 AM

Hedge Funds did not create the esoteric subprime securities, and its news to me they invested heavilly in them - more likely they speculated in them. Selling short has been going on for a long time - selling a firm's shares does not bankrupt the firm.

Posted by: WTF? at 06/09/2009 01:05:14 PM

SIGH.....Yet another...rambling from someone who clearly has no idea what they are talking about. If you are such a fan of Mutual Funds, Steve-o, i suggest that you stick to writing about them instead...you are unable to understand the Massive complexities and diversity of Hedge Funds. Articles like this do a serious injustice to the investment community and scare away an already vastly uneducated public...Sigh....

Posted by: Ally at 06/18/2009 03:57:26 AM

Unfortunately we only have this little box to respond in so I will keep it brief. What a load of rubbish...



Featured Videos From Kiplinger





Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

facebook
twitter
RSS