6 Health-Care Stocks That Make Sense
These companies should prosper, regardless of whether the health-care system is reformed.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Editor's note: This story was updated September 15.
A thick cloud of political uncertainty has been covering health-care stocks. At the core of the issue: Some reform of the health-care system seems likely, but will the high cost and record federal deficits keep President Obama from getting what he wants? Will some as yet unknown national health-care plan emerge to reengineer the current system?
And the big question for investors: Given such uncertainty, does it make sense to invest in health-care stocks before the dust settles? After all, any reform will likely mean cuts in prices of drugs and other health-care products and services, which would squeeze corporate profits.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Some smart buys exist, if you pick carefully. Many of the stocks are cheap, and some companies may actually benefit under any scenario. Also, global operators who generate half or more of their revenues from overseas aren't so affected by American health-care politics. Here are six health-care stocks that are reasonable values in this murky environment.
No matter the outcome of reform, generic drugs should benefit. Whether the government, employer or consumer is doing the spending, low-cost generics have an advantage. And over the next five years, $150-billion worth of pharmaceuticals are scheduled to come off patent, which means they're fair game for makers of generic drugs.
That's all good news for Israel-based Teva Pharmaceutical (symbol TEVA), the world's largest generic-drug maker. Standard & Poor's expects Teva, which generates 96% of sales outside its home country, to compound earnings by 17% annually over the next three years. Generics' share of pills is growing nearly everywhere, including key markets such as Japan and Europe. At the September close of $50.78, Teva sells for 15 times estimated 2009 earnings of $3.33 a share.
Teva's largest competitor in generics is Sandoz, a division of Switzerland's Novartis (NVS), which is also a Big Pharma heavyweight. Novartis, which books 70% of sales outside the U.S., has a particularly productive research lab (an impressive 16% of sales are allocated to R&D) and a nicely balanced product lineup that includes vaccines, diagnostics and eye-care products, along with brand-name and generic drugs. The stock of this financially rock-solid company yields 3.6% and, at $47.80, sells for almost 14 times projected 2009 earnings of $3.54 per share.
Perhaps the most diversified company in the industry is venerable Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). With J&J, which generates half of revenues abroad, you get a first-rate business in brand-name consumer products (Band-Aid, Listerine and Tylenol, to name a few) along with the patented drugs, medical devices and other health-care products whose pricing may be affected by health-care reform. J&J is a dividend-growth champ that yields 3.2%. The company is consistent, highly profitable and, at $60.15, sells for just 13 times earnings.
We know that drug makers are already under pressure to cut costs and to expedite the discovery and development of new drugs. Two beneficiaries of this industry trend to outsource are Covance (CVD) and Charles River Laboratories (CRL). Covance, which serves drug makers such as Eli Lilly, provides the laboratory work for one-third of all drug clinical trials worldwide (40% of revenues are from abroad).
Charles River is renowned for its business of breeding rats and mice for research. It produces the best lab rodents and has a 50% global market share in the business (the Food and Drug Administration and many other regulatory agencies require animal testing of drug candidates). Charles River then competes with the likes of Covance in the toxicology stage of drug testing. The stocks of both Covance and Charles River collapsed last fall, ultimately dropping more than 60%. Both have recovered a bit with the market and seem reasonably priced. At $57.55, Covance trades for 21 times 2009 earnings; Charles River, $36.13, trades at 15 times earnings of $2.41 per share.
Finally, we know that the aging and growth of the population means more prescriptions. Sales of generic medicines at drug stores such as CVS (CVS), the industry leader, are as good as -- or better than -- those of higher-priced, brand-name pills. CVS, which dispensed 729 million prescriptions in 2008, has 7,000 stores and opens 250 to 300 new ones each year. Most of the floor space is allocated to general merchandise, such as cosmetics, film processing and candy, but about 68% of the stores' revenues come from the pharmacy. Sales should reach $97 billion this year, and, at $36.44, the stock trades for 14 times the earnings forecast of $2.60 per share.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
Andrew Tanzer is an editorial consultant and investment writer. After working as a journalist for 25 years at magazines that included Forbes and Kiplinger’s Personal Finance, he served as a senior research analyst and investment writer at a leading New York-based financial advisor. Andrew currently writes for several large hedge and mutual funds, private wealth advisors, and a major bank. He earned a BA in East Asian Studies from Wesleyan University, an MS in Journalism from the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism, and holds both CFA and CFP® designations.
-
Americans, Even With Higher Incomes, Are Feeling the SqueezeA 50-year mortgage probably isn’t the answer, but there are other ways to alleviate the continuing sting of high prices
-
Hiding the Truth From Your Financial Adviser Can Cost YouHiding assets or debt from a financial adviser damages the relationship as well as your finances. If you're not being fully transparent, it's time to ask why.
-
How to Manage a Disagreement With Your Financial AdviserKnowing how to deal with a disagreement can improve both your finances and your relationship with your planner.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Caterpillar Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayCaterpillar stock has been a remarkably resilient market beater for a very long time.
-
I'm a 55-Year-Old Dad. Here’s How My 28-Year-Old Daughter Showed Me That AXP Is Still a Solid InvestmentAmerican Express stock is still a solid investment because management understands the value of its brand and is building a wide moat around it.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into AMD Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayAdvanced Micro Devices stock is soaring thanks to AI, but as a buy-and-hold bet, it's been a market laggard.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UPS Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUnited Parcel Service stock has been a massive long-term laggard.
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First Year of Trump's Second TermSix months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Lowe's Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayLowe's stock has delivered disappointing returns recently, but it's been a great holding for truly patient investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into 3M Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayMMM stock has been a pit of despair for truly long-term shareholders.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Coca-Cola Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayEven with its reliable dividend growth and generous stock buybacks, Coca-Cola has underperformed the broad market in the long term.