Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > World Trade, Sector Outlooks
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Should Congress lift the ban on drilling offshore and in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge?

Yes. America needs America's oil.
No. Oil companies have enough land to drill.
Not sure.
 
   view results
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 3, 2008
 

Big-Bank Woes
Begin to Spread

The largest U.S. banks are hurting badly, and the pain is starting to spread. Most small and midsize banks are still ready to lend to businesses, but they're getting nervous. This week's Kiplinger Letter examines the outlook.
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I am a strong believer border security, keeping track of work and student visas, etc but do you think that deportation of illegal immigrants is a waste of money?
-- Dingobiscuit
 

Rising Demand Spells Scant Relief for Food Costs

As Americans shell out more at the supermarket, more people around the world will wonder where their next meal will come from.
 
 

Food prices are going to stay high for years to come, both in the U.S. and abroad, exacerbating world hunger and political unrest. The upsurge in international support for global food aid programs won't solve the underlying problem: Worldwide demand is racing ahead of supply.

Bringing supplies in line with needs will take time. A projected 3% increase in global grain output this year will be a start. Longer-term improvement will require policy changes and technological breakthroughs that will reduce demand for food stocks being used to make fuels. A greater willingness by many countries to grow and import genetically modified foods is sure to help. And the U.S. will have to reverse a trend over the past several years of dramatically cutting its foreign aid budgets for agricultural research and development. "Unless we invest in agricultural development in the third world, no amount of food aid is going to solve this problem," says Andrew S. Natsios, formerly President Bush's administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Mid- to long-term solutions won't be much consolation to U.S. consumers, who'll see prices of eggs, cereal and other staples climb higher before gradually moderating over the next several years. Overall grocery food prices will go up 5% in 2008.

And they certainly won't ease the misery being felt by millions of people throughout the developing world today. Malnourishment leads to increased infant and child mortality as well as to increased vulnerability to infectious diseases among adults. The worst examples will occur in countries in which food or medical infrastructure has already broken down or in countries hit by additional shocks from severe weather or war. Myanmar is likely to provide a grim example in the wake of last week's devastating cyclone.

Peter Timmer, an economist with the Center for Global Development, puts the situation in stark terms. In an interview on the center's Web site, he says, "If current rice prices in world markets are actually transmitted into most Asian countries -- and this is not yet a reality, but it becomes more likely every day the world price stays this high -- then even conservative calculations suggest that upwards of 10 million people will die prematurely." Much of Africa is at equally high risk.

Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank Group, says that food inflation will push 100 million people deeper into poverty, wiping out worldwide gains in reducing poverty over the past seven years. In Latin America alone, about 16 million people face destitution. That will almost certainly boost illegal immigration to the U.S.

Will the rush to increase global food supplies stem inflation? No. At best, the aid will alleviate some immediate suffering. The U.S. and other developed nations aim to raise up to $2 billion soon for the United Nations' World Food Program (WFP) to cover the most urgent needs. The key challenge is getting food to where it's needed most. High fuel prices hike transportation costs, leaving less money for aid agencies to spend on food. Aggravating the problem, two dozen countries have imposed export bans on various food products. Such measures help hold down food costs within such countries by increasing local supplies, but they restrict food supplies and push up prices everywhere else. Even where official export bans aren't in effect, fear of inflation-driven shortages can prompt individuals to hoard food, with similar effect. The WFP strives to buy food from nations near distribution areas in order to control transport costs. Short supplies in Kenya are greatly complicating the organization's ability to obtain food for neighboring Somalia, for example.

The threat of increased food rioting is a major security worry in many countries, a big reason why food aid will be stepped up. Of special concern to U.S. officials: Food insecurity in nations that have large armies significantly raises the risk of armed conflicts. There's historical precedent for such concern -- for example, the French Revolution and Japanese imperial expansion in the 1930s.

Ironically, much of the problem stems from recent success stories of the world economy. Rapid growth in China, India and other large emerging markets is creating middle classes throughout the developing world. These new middle-class consumers have more to spend on nutrition. Increasingly, they're spending on protein, rather than just on the grains that have long dominated their diets. The combination of this new customer base with the strong demand from the developed world is pushing up global meat prices. Worse, because it takes several pounds of grain to produce a single pound of beef, chicken or pork, livestock farmers have to purchase ever larger amounts of cereal crops for feed. That, in turn, drives up the price of corn, wheat, rice, soybeans and sorghum.

Soaring energy prices constitute another major factor. Again, the greater thirst for oil in emerging markets, added to existing demand from the developed world, provides much of the explanation. Higher oil costs translate to higher costs for chemical fertilizers and pesticides, for electricity to run pumps and irrigation systems and for fuel for everything from tractors and trucks to containerships. All of that adds to the cost of the food itself. Using grain to make ethanol as a way of supplementing fuel supplies further reduces the supply of grain for the table and pushes food inflation higher still.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (4)


SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |    
ADD HEADLINES: