The Secret Is Out on Social Security

Readers say they hit the jackpot by using our little-known strategies to boost benefits.

By Mary Beth Franklin, Senior Editor

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, October 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Donald McCarren knows a thing or two about money. After all, he directs the MBA program at Lincoln Memorial University, in Harrogate, Tenn. But he didn't know that his 5-year-old daughter, Alexa, was entitled to Social Security benefits worth up to half of his monthly check until she reaches age 18.

Nor did his accountant, his estate attorney or "a very successful money manager," who happens to be his son. But then McCarren read Secret Ways to Boost Your Social Security.

RELATED LINKS
Secret Ways to Boost Your Social Security
Three Ways to Boost Your Benefits
Calculate the Retirement Savings You Need

The article noted that minor children of older men such as McCarren, 68, are entitled to monthly benefits when a parent begins collecting Social Security. "I went to the Social Security office," he says, "and was told that my daughter was entitled to $1,068 per month and that the benefit was retroactive."

McCarren and his wife, Anoula, 42, have already received a check for more than $40,000. He estimates that over the next 12 years, the added benefits, which he plans to invest for Alexa's college education, will be worth more than $250,000. "We were just amazed," he says. "It's almost too good to be true."

Claiming spousal benefits. Many two-career couples assume they will claim Social Security based on their individual work records. They tend to dismiss spousal benefits (worth 50% of the worker's benefits) as a throwback to the good old days of Leave It to Beaver. But several readers of the July story -- among them Tom West of Minneapolis -- were astonished to learn that if they applied for benefits at their normal retirement age (which is 66 for anyone born between 1943 and 1954), they could restrict their application to spousal benefits and delay collecting on their own record until later, when their benefits would be worth more. Depending on your birth year, your retirement benefit increases by 7% to 8% for every year you delay collecting, until age 70.

For Tom and his wife, Kathleen, the surprise benefits translate into nearly $700 a month in extra income. Kathleen, a former nurse, started collecting at 62. But Tom, 66, a theology professor, plans to keep working for at least four more years. "Until I read the Kiplinger's article, I never dreamed that I could draw spousal benefits," says Tom. "I submitted my application, and within ten days I had received a check for $2,760 retroactive to February, when I reached my full retirement age."

By the time Tom applies in four years for his own retirement benefits, they will be worth about $2,300 a month -- 28% more than what he could collect today. "That's like earning 7% a year on an investment, and it's hard to get 7% a year anywhere else," he says.

And by waiting until age 70 to collect a larger retirement benefit, Tom also dramatically increases the survivor benefit that his wife would receive. Although Kathleen began collecting at 62, which reduces her retirement benefit by 25% for the rest of her life, she would still receive a full, unreduced survivor benefit -- worth 100% of what Tom receives -- if he dies before her because she has now reached her normal retirement age.

Tom is thrilled with his windfall, but it didn't come easy. When he applied for spousal benefits online at the Social Security Web site (www.ssa.gov), the agency misinterpreted his request and processed his claim for benefits on his own record. So he withdrew his application and tried again in person at the local Social Security office. "You have to be persistent," Tom warns. "Three SSA agents gave me totally wrong information. If you're not well informed and certain you are correct, you can easily be defeated after a few phone calls." Our article also brought peace to the Barra household in Dania Beach, Fla.

"My wife was pressuring me to collect Social Security so she could collect her spousal benefits," says Gerald Barra, 66. But Gerald, an engineer, would like to delay collecting benefits until 70. Normally, you can't collect spousal benefits until the primary worker files for Social Security. But after reading the article, Gerald realized that he could "file and suspend" -- apply for retirement benefits now, allowing his wife, Patricia, to collect spousal benefits, and then immediately suspend his own application so he can accumulate delayed-retirement credits. As a result, the Barras will boost their household income by about $12,000 a year.

Get Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine for $12. Save 75%!

Discuss

Reader Comments (12)

Posted by: B. Fitzgerald at 09/10/2008 08:18:37 PM

According to what I was told at the SSA 1-800 number, children's benefits are only retro-active for a year from date of filing. Did you get retro-active benefits for your daughter from the date she was born?

Posted by: Jim at 09/11/2008 08:03:04 AM

I believe ALL federal, state and local governments have to "invest" more training resources in this and other areas affecting the growing number of retirees who will have 20-30 years before some ailment befalls them.

Posted by: ron at 09/12/2008 06:37:31 PM

Does anyone know if a window can collect any SSN dollars from their deceased spouse? She is already collecting her own SSN benefit. Ron

Posted by: Ellie at 09/13/2008 02:13:50 AM

Does this mean if I take my SS money out at 66, my husband can apply for 1/2 of the amount? When he reaches 70 could he then tap into his own SS and then I would do the same b/c it would be more moneY and both of give up mine? Would we have to pay what we have taken out thorough me? Thanks, Ellie

Posted by: John at 09/13/2008 08:26:16 AM

As an Employee of SSA if Mr. McCarren mentioned his daughter on his Retirement Application but a claim was never taken for his daughter was never taken then she would be due benefits back to his date of entitlement. This is considered a "protective filing" by SSA. Otherwise, there is only retro and she would be paid back one year if she was not mentioned on his claim. It gets very complicated so now you know why we make the "big bucks"....lol.

Posted by: S.M. at 09/16/2008 08:44:51 AM

It's no wonder Social Security is going bankrupt when there are all those extra payments to spouses and dependents. I believe only the persons who paid into it should receive the benefits.

Posted by: B. Fitzgerald at 09/16/2008 10:53:42 AM

John, thanks for the feedback. My late husband was on SSD for an accident in the military which left him paralyzed. He was unmarried at the time, so the application would have been filled out "no" for children. Luckily, after we married he was able to father two children. I was told by my sister to file for children's benefits. I did and got them but retro for one year.

Posted by: Dawby at 09/16/2008 07:28:44 PM

Would you believe that SS told a twice widowed, disabled woman, nearly 66 yrs old, that she could not get survivor benefits because she was not married to either spouse 10 years and because she does not have enough SS credits on her own record, she was told she qualifies for nothing?

Posted by: S.M. at 09/17/2008 02:16:41 PM

Dawby: the 10-year rule is a bummer but that's why there's life insurance. Apparently the woman's two husbands should have purchased some to care for her. So if a women is married twice for 10+ years each, can she collect survivor benefits for both husbands?

Posted by: e.mcpherson at 02/10/2009 10:34:17 PM

I was married for 25 years. I am entitled to 1/2 my ex-husband's benefits. I am 67 and do not want to collect my own unil 70. Can I now collect on my ex-husband's benefits until mine start?

Posted by: cgtoscano at 06/11/2009 02:36:23 PM

I am 64 years old and I have a 16 yr old daughter. If I apply for benefits is she entitled to monthly benefits equal to 50% of my benefits retroactive to when I turned 62? What happens if I suspend my benefit payments until I'm 70 to get a higher rate? Does my wife have to wait until she is 62 to receive spousal benefits?

Posted by: Irene at 09/23/2009 09:01:14 PM

I have contacted Mr. McCarren and he verified he had no trouble getting all the retroactive backpay. However, I am in a similar position and SSA tells me I can only get 6 months retroactive benefits. Although they tell me I can appeal after I get the 6 months. My husband was 73 when we adopted our son(then 11)and were not aware this benefit existed. It was not until my husband died 2 months ago and the social security agent handling the death benefits asked why my son had not been receiving the payments. I have written to both US senators in hopes of getting help.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Turning Allowances Into Savings

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement