Mutual Funds

The 25 Best Funds

Seven new names join our list of favorites.

By Andrew Tanzer, Senior Associate Editor

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, May 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

These are the times that try investors' souls. The stock market is cracking. The housing bubble is deflating. Credit markets are frozen and banks are nursing self-inflicted wounds. The economy may have lapsed into recession. Even normally dull corners of the investment world, such as municipal bonds, are jittery.

At some point the cycle will turn -- it always does -- and the future will look brighter. We can't tell you when it will occur. But we can help you meet your long-term financial goals by constructing a well-diversified portfolio of the best mutual funds.

RELATED LINKS
NEW! Visit the Kiplinger 25 Center for Year-Round Updates
Key Data for the Kiplinger 25
Suggested Portfolios Using the Kiplinger 25
What's Changed Since Last Year
Fund Rankings by Performance
Sign Up for Kiplinger 25 E-mail Alerts

To help you build your nest egg, we have surveyed the universe of thousands of funds and selected the best stock and bond funds for our annual Kiplinger 25 list. This year, we include a commodity fund for the first time.

We consider only funds that do not levy upfront or back-end sales charges (redemption fees that disappear after a month or two are okay). And we prefer funds that charge below-average annual fees.

We closely examine fund managers' track records -- the longer, the better -- and listen carefully to how they describe their investment strategy and style. We compare their performance with the risk they bear.

We look for managers who know their stocks intimately, tend toward low turnover (with certain exceptions) and have the discipline to adhere to an investment style through rocky market periods. We favor managers who care about the preservation of your capital, although we are willing to recommend aggressive funds if the returns they have produced are commensurate with the risks they've taken. Finally, we give extra credit to managers who talk freely about their investment blunders and the lessons learned.

Investors have different investment styles, needs and time horizons, too. Therefore, we suggest three different portfolios composed of funds drawn from the Kiplinger 25.

Large-company stock funds

Longleaf Partners (symbol LLPFX). Even if you're not overly confident in the stock market's immediate prospects, this is a good time to open an account with Longleaf Partners. The fund has a habit of closing to new investors when its managers think it's growing too large to invest efficiently. In fact, Longleaf recently reopened after being shut for more than three years.

Run by Memphis-based Southeastern Asset Management, Longleaf has a long history of doing right by its shareholders. Closing to new investors is one way this is manifest. In addition, SAM employees are required to put all of their stock money in Long-leaf funds.

Performance hasn't been too bad, either. Under Mason Hawkins and C. Staley Cates, who head a team of nine analyst-managers, Longleaf has returned an annualized 13% over the past 20 years to March 10, an average of two percentage points per year better than Standard & Poor's 500-stock index. But don't expect Longleaf's returns to march in lock step with the index. That's because Hawkins and his team adhere to strict value-investing principles and pay no attention to sector weightings.

When evaluating potential investments, Longleaf's managers focus mainly on three issues. First, they seek good businesses, by which they mean companies that are insulated from competition, generate strong free cash flow (the money left after making the capital outlays needed to build or maintain the business) and have plenty of growth opportunities. Next, they seek quality executive teams, preferably owner-operators and certainly managers with capital-allocation skills to maximize the use of that abundant free cash flow.

Finally, the price must be right. The fund buys a stock if it is selling for 60% or less of Longleaf's calculation of the company's intrinsic value. Once the managers buy, they hold stocks for an average of five years.

As you might expect, the portfolio is eclectic. The largest holding at last report was Dell, the personal-computer maker. The moat protecting Dell is its low costs and its unmatched direct-to-customer sales. The company generates huge amounts of free cash. In addition, founder and chief executive Michael Dell is a large shareholder and, in Longleaf's estimation, knows how to invest company cash.

Dodge & Cox Stock (DODGX). Dodge & Cox Stock made a hefty investment in Wachovia Bank in late 2006. The bank's shares sank in 2007 with the rest of the financial sector. So what did Dodge & Cox do? It doubled up and raised its stake in the bank to 4%. "We're patient and persistent," says John Gunn, one of the fund's nine managers and chairman of the San Francisco-based fund family.

Their discipline pays off for shareholders. Over the past 20 years, Stock -- which, like Longleaf, recently reopened to new investors -- has returned more than 13% annualized. Not many large-company stock funds can match that record.

Although Dodge & Cox is known as a classic bargain-hunting shop, Gunn says the managers want growing companies that sell at attractive prices. For instance, Stock has loaded up on big drug makers, such as Novartis and Glaxo, both based in Europe. Gunn says the major drug companies are selling at the lowest measures of value in 20 years. The fund's largest position is Hewlett-Packard, which, Gunn says, neatly encompasses two "tidal forces acting out the next three to five years": the swift pace of technological innovation and growth prospects for 5.5 billion people in the developing world, who are steadily plugging in to the global economy.

T. Rowe Price Equity Income ( PRFDX). Brian Rogers has run T. Rowe Price Equity Income since the fund began in 1985. So he's survived a wicked cycle or two. He sees shades of the 1990 real estate bust today, except that this time it's residential instead of commercial property. His advice: "Don't get irrationally depressed. The world doesn't end that often."

Instead, Rogers is picking up companies with strong balance sheets and staying power, such as General Electric and McGraw-Hill. The market could take a while to turn around, but Rogers reckons that if you look out three years, it's hard to imagine that a portfolio of high-quality companies paying regularly rising dividends won't beat, say, the return on five-year Treasuries.

Get Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine for $12. Save 75%!

Discuss

Reader Comments (6)

Posted by: Dennis Chrin at 05/08/2008 10:18:01 AM

In the Kiplinger 25, you've dropped the Champlain Small Company Fund because it recently closed it's doors to new investors. But you added Dodge & Cox Stock Fund to your "25", which is also closed. Thanks for a great magazine.

Posted by: andrew tanzer at 05/08/2008 03:00:03 PM

Thank you for your inquiry, Mr. Chrin. This is Andrew Tanzer, author of this article. FYI: The Dodge & Cox Stock Fund re-opened earlier this year, which is why we were able to include it in this year's Kiplinger 25. You can get more information by typing in Dodge & Cox Stock in the search field for our Web site at the top of this page, and you'll see the update. Hope this helps.

Posted by: rps at 05/22/2008 12:09:42 AM

I disagree with Dodge & Cox Stock fund in the Kip 25. It has underperformed lately because their asset size is more than the managers can handle. as of 5-22-08, it's 3 yr record is 48th percentile. Year to date is in the 78th percentile. In 2006, it was in the 48th percentile. In 2007, it was in the 62nd percentile. I believe this fund will continue to underperform until their asset size comes down to a managable level...

Posted by: Louis Wall at 06/15/2008 11:12:30 AM

I think it would be a good idea to post the funds performance since it was added to the Kiplinger 25. This way you can see how the performance really is after adding it.

Posted by: Ray at 07/28/2008 03:18:45 PM

I am OK with Dodge & Cox Stock fund because at least its 3-year and 5-year beats peers. It is not one of the best funds in my category, but at least a decent fund. But if you look at Legg Mason Opportunity (LMOPX), it is just horrible under down market, 1 year performance -35.65% vs -6.53% for peers, 3 years -2.59% vs 7.85% for peers, and 5 year is no better, how did this fund ever get into the 25 list? Same thing is probably true for FBRVX. FBRVX used to be a great fund since I owned it for several years, but the management seems to have lost touch in the last few years. Actually, if you want all the fund performance in this list, I found a site called Fund Mojo that puts all the 25 funds in a portfolio so that it is pretty easy to see. This forum does not allow url, but you can google it if you want.

Posted by: raquelita at 10/30/2008 01:57:51 PM

I would like to see Kiplinger post info about how much the managers of the Kiplinger 25 invest in their own funds. Also it's my recollection that during the past year Dodge and Cox asked its shareholders to vote on authorizing derivatives. If this is so, I think the fund has become riskier.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Extra Cash for the Holidays

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement