Health-Care Reform Takes Center Stage

But budget constraints will limit President-elect Obama’s options.

By Kimberly Lankford, Contributing Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance

November 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Health-care reform was one of President-elect Barack Obama's major domestic issues throughout the campaign, and his victory means that health care will be a priority.

What will Obama's plan look like? Based on his campaign proposals, people would have both private and public insurance options. They could keep their current coverage through their employer or, on their own, buy new private coverage or enroll in a public insurance plan that would be portable and provide benefits similar to plans currently available to federal employees. Small businesses and individuals could buy public or approved private coverage through a national Health Insurance Exchange, a marketplace that could make it easier to shop for insurance.

Obama's plan would expand Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program, and it would provide subsidies to make coverage more affordable for lower-income people. He would require children to have health insurance, and most employers would have to provide either "meaningful coverage" (yet to be defined) or contribute a percentage of their payroll to the public plan. Small businesses would receive a refundable tax credit as an incentive to provide coverage.

In the most significant change, people could not be rejected or charged higher rates because of existing health conditions, regardless of whether they buy private or public insurance. That would be a big boon for individuals with medical problems, but it could have unintended consequences. "It doesn't give people an incentive to purchase coverage when they're healthy because they can just sign up for care when they think they’re going to need it," says Cori Uccello, of the American Academy of Actuaries.

RELATED LINKS
Obama’s 10 Big Challenges
Blog: Now What? How Obama Will Govern
How Obama's Tax Plan Could Affect You

That's what has happened in New York and New Jersey. In those states, insurers can’t reject anyone, but residents pay some of the highest premiums in the U.S. Obama's plan will work only if the premiums end up being low enough to encourage healthy people to sign up for coverage, even if they aren't required to. That will depend on how much money the government is willing to spend on subsidies to help lower-income people.

How much will it cost?

Cost is the big question mark about any health-care plan right now. The Obama campaign estimates that his health-care plan will cost $50 billion to $65 billion per year, which he plans to fund in part by rolling back tax breaks for households with income of more than $250,000.

But coming up with the money to make big changes would be much tougher today than it was when Obama's plan was first introduced—before the government spent hundreds of billions of dollars on its financial-rescue plan. As a result, "the temptation will be to do something incremental, especially around expanding insurance for children, because the budgetary realities will be so grim," says Jonathan Oberlander, associate professor of health politics and policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "Any way you cut it, comprehensive health reform is a tough proposition in the near future."

A lot will depend on the makeup of Congress, says Oberlander. "Liberal Democrats will want to push Obama to move faster to do something more comprehensive, and they will argue this is too important to put off regardless of the fiscal situation," he says. And interest in health-care reform could increase if unemployment continues to grow and more people are left without group coverage.

Before overhauling the system, Congress could approve smaller changes to reduce health-care costs (both Barack Obam's and John McCain's plans included cost-reduction measures), such as improving health information technology, focusing on preventive care and changing the way medical providers are paid.

For more details on Obama's health plan, read the longer analysis by the Tax Policy Center, or go to health08.org, sponsored by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Discuss

Reader Comments (6)

Posted by: Mark at 11/05/2008 08:10:42 AM

As someone who has always had insurance and whose wife was recently diagnosed with cancer, it has opened my eyes as to what it means to now suffer from a "pre-existing condition". Our insurance companies are taking advantage of every loop hole they can find in the existing system, can deny coverage and force a financially stable household into bankruptcy. I am a republican, but know that as a society we have to find a way to provide AFFORDABLE medical care to everyone.

Posted by: Julian Lieb,M.D at 11/05/2008 02:22:57 PM

Innovation that reduces utilization is the only solution. Unfortunately, the opponents of innovation far exceed its supporters...

Posted by: Matt at 11/05/2008 02:34:25 PM

To make health care affordable, we need to separate the every day type visits from the catastrophic problems. I believe we need some type of government backed catastrophic insurance fund to covered the unexpected very very expensive cases such as cancer. For small stuff, let nurses or some new classification below full doctor handle the sniffles and cuts at cheap competitive clinics. And if you choose an emergency room instead of a clinic, then you should pay the difference.

Posted by: Kermit at 11/05/2008 05:44:57 PM

I have a fairly high paying job with wonderful benefits. My oldest son, however, works for a small company that does not provide any health insurance for its employees. Thank goodness for Obama. Maybe my son can afford health insurance in the near future.

Posted by: banish taylor at 11/05/2008 09:34:41 PM

I have yet to see a proposed health care plan that will not destroy current private industry coverage or they will opt out just like they are doing with defined pension plans or IRA'S. We need coverage availability for all with some sort of catastrophic coverage.A national health insurance pool made up of private companies would seem to be a place to start. We do not need bureaucrates telling us when where and what medical care we need or can get. Unless of courese the DC politicians are placed on the same plan they devise for us. Good luck on that one!

Posted by: Brian at 11/06/2008 10:08:18 PM

I think the plan should be to offer a single payer, government run and take the large amount of overhead out of hospitals and drug companies which should all be NFP. Not necesarily by importing cheap drugs from overseas, but not allowing DTC (direct to consumer) ads and the 10-year grace period. Generics can pay a fee to the developing companies.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Beef Up Your Credit Score

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement