Markets

Recession at the Gates

It's going to take more than Fed rate cuts to repair the economy.

By Anne Kates Smith, Senior Associate Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance

March 18, 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Investors on Wall Street have been worried about a recession for months. Ditto for the folks on Main Street -- especially if they've been trying to sell a house, or just keep up with the payments. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson stopped short of using the R-word, but admitted the U.S. economy was in a "sharp decline."

Cue another rate cut from the Federal Reserve.

For the sixth time since September, the Fed cut its benchmark rate on March 18, shaving three-quarters of a point from the federal funds rate. At 2.25%, the rate is the lowest it's been since December 2004.

The vote to cut rates wasn't unanimous, an indication that the Fed is fighting to jumpstart the economy without fueling inflation. And the cut wasn't the one-point reduction that some had expected.

Still, investors on Wall Street applauded the cut: The Dow Jones industrial average jumped 420 points, or 3.5%. Even the dollar crept a bit higher versus the euro and the yen.

But even with another cut expected in April to bring the rate down to 2%, an increasing number of economists fear it won't be enough to stave off recession. "The economy is contracting -- no one can debate that,' says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "Employment growth is slowing, retail sales are shrinking, and industrial activity is weakening. The consensus -- and there wasn't one six weeks ago -- is that this is going to be a recession."

The latest survey by Blue Chip Economic Indicators, taken in early March, found 40% of economists calling for a recession -- and that number is likely at least 50% now, editors say.

We agree that a contraction is likely in the first half of the year. The economic stimulus package enacted by Congress in February will put hefty tax rebate checks in taxpayers' pockets come summer, helping to boost growth in the third quarter.

Whether a recession remains mild or becomes painful and whether a downturn resumes in the fourth quarter are questions as yet unanswered, and policy makers hold the key.

Which key? Certainly not rate cuts alone, says former Fed governor Lyle Gramley. "In previous recessions if the Fed stomped hard on the monetary accelerator, it would stop things. But the Fed isn't gaining much traction. It's a little scary -- the negative dynamics are more ferocious and the instrument you counted on to turn things around isn't working very well."

That's why the Fed has gone outside the rate-cutting box with a series of aggressive moves aimed at putting out fires that continue to spread throughout the economy, from the housing market decline to the credit crunch to a liquidity crisis on Wall Street. The Central Bank said it would lend some $200 billion to 20 big banks in exchange for mortgage-backed debt. Then it agreed to become the lender of last resort for investment banks -- something not seen since the Great Depression. And, of course, it brokered the fire sale of Bear Sterns, rather than risk a wholesale crisis of confidence.

The focus on trying to keep markets stable and get credit flowing again shows that Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, a student of the Great Depression, has learned his lessons well, says Mesirow Financial economist Diane Swonk. "Easy money is the way to go, with a holistic approach. What matters is not what the fed funds rate is, but whether or not you can get credit."

Even an aggressive, creative Fed can't work magic, however. For the recession to remain mild -- think unemployment peaking at 6% late this year or early next, says Zandi -- further steps are needed from Congress or the Bush administration to address the tanking housing market.

Zandi would like to see the Treasury create an entity that would use taxpayer money to buy mrotgage loans and mortgage securities -- sort of like the old Resolution Trust Corp., which was set up to unwind the savings and loan crisis back in the '80s. The object would not be so much to bail out homeowners as to set a value for mortgage securities, so that the private mortgage market could function again and the housing market could stabilize.

Congress is mulling plans, too, including a second economic stimulus package. It also is considering a proposal for the government to guarantee home mortgages, albeit at reduced values, to give lenders an incentive to work with borrowers to avoid foreclosure. "It's time for the federal government to put some skin in the game and take some of these bad mortgages out of the market," says former Fed governor Gramley.

Failure to act could have catastrophic consequences, he adds. "Worst-case scenario, if Congress does nothing and the administration does nothing, no one knows where the bottom might be. It's potentially that dire."

Topics:

Discuss

Reader Comments (11)

Posted by: Zeev Reuteman at 03/19/2008 09:07:14 AM

The lack of some solid reference support of the dollar currency for decades and the sustained issuing of more money to feed Wall Street voracious speculators cannot be patched with interest rate cuts....We must pay the price; the dollar will inevitably collapse...We had been warned since 1956.

Posted by: Nomen at 03/19/2008 10:05:36 AM

Why don't the experts admit that the rapid jump in the cost of energy is the biggest wolf circling the flock. While the housing and loan problems affect a lot of people, the rapid jump in energy costs and the accompanying inflation has hit everyone. My tax rebate check will be spent on gas and utilities and then it will be gone. Then what?

Posted by: Bill at 03/19/2008 01:39:01 PM

How long is wall street going to keep saying we are close to a recession.I am here to tell you we are already there I have lost over 1/3 of my 401 and I am in a very conservative fund. This country has lost too much of its manufacturing resources...(while) making money off of money. We have just let the congress and Senate and Wall Street do as they please. Banks have bought up most of the smaller banks not a good idea. Unions have cost our manufacturing base...by asking for to much...Seams like our system is broken...Freeze the interest rates on the housing market and the credit card companies.

Posted by: Douglas A. Fraser at 03/19/2008 06:34:38 PM

All the people in Washington DC; both Dems and Repubs, don't seem to have a clue as to what is needed to stimulate the economy: Right now and for along time thereafter....Cut the fuel costs by what ever means necessary...and ethanol is not the answer in terms of fuel economy, cost of production, or the environment...WE HAVE PLENTY OF OIL IN THE USA...

Posted by: Chris B. at 03/19/2008 10:16:40 PM

The Feds will have to bail out the financial sector. Yes, the Feds will lose SOME money in the short coming. But it will payoff in just the right time when our troops come home. Also, the feds also have to come up with some creative way to lower gas prices and get Americans to work.

Posted by: Vince at 03/19/2008 10:27:03 PM

Its really hard to imagine that you lost 1/3 of your 401k in a conservative fund since the market is only down 15% off its all time high. Plus since 2003 the S and P even after this downturn is up 58%. A very conservative fund is assuming to be a mix of stocks and bonds which on avg would be down about 11% off all time highs and up 51% since 2003. Even if we just go back to 1990..the S and P is up 350+%. So when you say you lost 1/3 of your 401k did you just lose some of your gains that you wouldnt have had if you werent invested? Therefore, you really havent lost at all. System is definitely choppy...but the market is still the best way to make gains over time.

Posted by: doug hum at 03/23/2008 12:08:57 PM

...DRILL for the oil we have in abundance in this country???- time for someone to get tough!--before china gets ALL the oil!!!

Posted by: claude at 03/23/2008 11:36:58 PM

Even if congress or the administration do more to encourage the economy, no one knows wheret he bottom might be.

Posted by: James at 04/04/2008 12:02:34 PM

I wish they would quit cutting rates already. it doesn't seem to be helping and for those of us who actually save money we are getting burnt.

Posted by: Bill Warren at 08/19/2008 08:32:40 AM

...what is good for the banks, ISN'T going to be good for the TAXPAYING citizens of this country.

Posted by: jim at 10/06/2008 11:19:59 PM

james it actually is helping. its not turning things in favor for the bulls but you have no idea how bad things could be if they werent lowering rates. if saving is your goal then interest rates shouldnt affect you a whole lot right now. invest for the long term, ride the ups and downs with a diversified portfolio and forget about the day to day hooplah.. in 5 years its not going to matter what the dow did today

Today's Video More Videos >>

Extra Cash for the Holidays

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement