Give a Gift

Value Added

Robert Shiller Suggests a New Deal-Style Solution to Unemployment

This Yale economist, who has a fine record as a prognosticator, says we need massive federal jobs programs to get the economy moving.

By Steven Goldberg, Contributing Columnist, Kiplinger.com

September 21, 2010
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Advertisement

If you had acted on two of Robert Shiller’s important calls over the past decade, you’d probably have more money than you do now. His 2000 book, Irrational Exuberance, warned that stocks were dangerously overpriced. A 43% decline in Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index began the month it was published. A 2005 edition of the same book warned of a bubble in housing prices. Well, you know what happened next.

A Yale University economist, Shiller is now worried about joblessness remaining high for many years -- and he advocates New Deal–style programs as a solution. “We have to create jobs, just like Franklin D. Roosevelt did,” he says. Shiller cites FDR’s Civilian Conservation Corps, which paid three million unemployed young men to do unskilled manual labor in conservation and the development of natural resources during the Great Depression.

Related Links


Shiller also advocates resuming a federal revenue-sharing program that sent tens of billions of dollars to states and local governments from 1972 through 1987, with few strings attached. “States and local governments are shutting down important activities,” Shiller says. Because revenue sharing supported diverse activities, he says, the program didn’t fall into the trap of spending on the wrong things or focusing too much on a couple of “grand projects.”

Shiller’s proposals come at a time when Republicans are opposing new programs on the grounds that more spending would expand already-huge federal budget deficits and could eventually cause a collapse of the dollar.

Shiller argues that the debt concerns are misplaced. He agrees that the federal government needs to dramatically slow the increase in spending on health and welfare programs to put the deficit on a sustainable, long-term path. “But I don’t think dollar problems are imminent, and it would be better to stimulate the economy and put people to work than to let this prolonged period of economic weakness continue,” he says.

Fears of a double-dip recession

Shiller is more worried than most economists about a double-dip recession. He first raised his concerns in May, when the economic recovery still appeared to be gaining strength. He puts the odds of the economy falling back into recession anytime soon at less than 50/50. But he adds that a double dip “could happen in a couple of years, before we’re healed.” (The National Bureau of Economic Research, the arbiter of economic cycles in the U.S. said on September 20 that the recession that started late in 2007 ended in June 2009.)

Shiller worries that the causes of long-term joblessness haven’t been adequately addressed. Currently, a record-high 4.3% of the workforce has been unemployed for more than six months. In every recession since World War II, except the 1980 downturn, that figure dropped below 1% before another recession hit. “I’m somewhat pessimistic about the economy for the next ten years,” he says. “I think we’ll have growth, but it won’t be up to old standards.” The unemployment rate is currently 9.6%.

What about stocks? Shiller tracks price-earnings ratios by averaging earnings over the preceding ten years. Based on that methodology, U.S. stocks trade at 20 times earnings, a high figure. Cost-cutting, some of it unsustainable, has boosted earnings lately, he says. Shiller says you shouldn’t avoid stocks, but “you shouldn’t invest too much” in them, either.

With yields so low, he says, bonds “are very iffy.” He prescribes a balanced portfolio, including U.S. stocks and a big helping of foreign stocks, as well as bonds and commodities.

Shiller’s name has become synonymous with the housing bust, largely because of the Case-Shiller Home Price index, which he helped develop. He’s not sure which way home prices will go now, but he thinks the worst is over: “I wouldn’t hold off on buying a home if you’re a long-term buyer. Even if prices fall 10%, you’ll be locking in low mortgage rates today.”

Known for his accurate calls, Shiller is loath to make many predictions just now. “I don’t have a lot of certainty about the future except when things are at extremes,” he says. For now, Shiller doesn’t see any bubbles.

Steven T. Goldberg (bio) is an investment adviser.



DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (7)

Posted by: Carol at 09/22/2010 11:31:50 AM

Gee, isn't this what Obama and liberal economists have been advocating since the last Presidential election. And isn't that why Americans voted for him? Now you are publishing articles about this and you think its a "revelation" Of course from his mouth its "Socialism". Of course the Republicians, and Teabaggers and Sarah Palin and Beck won't have it. And, of course, the American people look like they will swing the votes to their crowd this November. What do Americans want? They'd rather listen to these clowns and corporate America and stay sheep--to be miserable and status quo as usual. Nothing will ever get done. The American people will get what they got coming. Like I laughed when the housing bubble bust(having predicted it years before it happened), I will laugh again at all the stupidity and selfishness that plagues this country.

Posted by: Anita Mitchell at 09/22/2010 11:36:01 AM

This proposed program would be a Trifecta for the U.S. taxpayer and citizen. American materials could be used to rebuild much needed infrastructure, employing U.S. citizens. We get jobs, we get modern transportation, bridges, water systems, roads, and U.S. corporations would get anufacturing orders for the cement, steel, paint, pipes, PVC, electrical controls, sensors, etc. How could this be a losing proposition when it has worked before? And a populace with jobs is a happy populace, and a more peaceful society.

Posted by: jimbo at 09/22/2010 10:01:37 PM

Robert Schiller and MORE Ferderal spending is completely delusional.

Posted by: Max at 09/24/2010 07:49:43 PM

My favorite memory about jobs programs came from Philadelphia. The local jobs program agency was trying to increase the amount they paid the jobless for make-work jobs because, they said, they couldn't get people to participate. The quote was something like this: As long as the workers can make more money at Wendy's and McDonalds, we can't get them to participate in our jobs program. What we need are quality private industry jobs; not dead-end, make-work government jobs that teach such high demand skills as litter control.

Posted by: Gray Fox at 09/26/2010 04:14:28 AM

I just read in the news about how the last stimulus package spent billions of dollars and created only a handful of new jobs. I think it was $2 million spent for each new job created. How is this going to be any better

Posted by: Sheldon at 09/28/2010 08:21:10 AM

Only one question: Exactly how are we supposed to pay for this proposed spending? (a) borrow money from China or (b) print the money?

Posted by: Nomen at 10/05/2010 06:49:52 PM

I agree up to a point but depression type jobs programs won't work and will only add to the deficit. What we need are tariffs on businesses outsourcing work out of the U.S. and a crack down on the employers of illegals to get Americans working again. If this doesn't happen, there will be a double dip, then triple dip recession from which we won't ever recover.




Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

Featured Videos From Kiplinger




facebook
twitter
RSS