Value Added
What Sparked the Selloff
Heavy forced selling by highly leveraged hedge funds is partly to blame for the recent market bloodbath.
By Steven Goldberg, Contributing Columnist, Kiplinger.com
November 13, 2008
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
A bunch of high-profile hedge-fund managers came to Capitol Hill on October 13 and testified that they and their funds were not to blame for the current financial mess. Maybe. But hedge funds are hardly innocent bystanders.
Whenever there's a bear market, the so-called experts usually blame individuals -- or "retail," as they call rank-and-file investors. Indeed, individual investors have beaten a hasty retreat from stock funds, selling an estimated $68 billion in October, or 1.4% of total stock-fund assets, according to TrimTabs Investment Research. That's a one-month record.
But the real blame for this bear market belongs with the professionals. First, of course, investment banks poured hundreds of billions of dollars into subprime-mortgage securities and other toxic paper. They magnified their bets as much as 30-fold by investing borrowed money. The industry essentially destroyed itself.
But investment bankers aren't the only culprits in the market tragedy. When the history of this era is written, hedge funds will merit a few chapters, too. Hedge funds are virtually unregulated investment pools intended only for wealthy and supposedly sophisticated investors. Like investment bankers, they love borrowed money, often leveraging their bets by 5-to-1 or 10-to-1.
Hedge funds were allowed under the laws enacted after the 1929 stock market crash. But they were restricted to individual investors with substantial assets -- at least $1 million -- and to institutional investors, such as pension funds. What's more, they were originally designed to "hedge" investors' exposure to stocks. That is, a classic hedge fund might have 50% of its assets in stocks and the other 50% in short sales -- bets that certain stocks would fall in price.
But all that changed. Near as I can tell, David Swensen, who has done a superb job managing Yale's endowment, played a big role in their transformation. So did the disastrous 2000-02 bear market, which prompted pension-fund managers to look elsewhere for healthy returns.
In his 2000 book, Pioneering Portfolio Management, Swensen said his success involved surrendering the ability to sell securities easily (liquidity) and, instead, investing in such assets as commodities, real estate, private equity (as opposed to stocks traded on exchanges) and hedge funds.
Like lemmings, pension funds and other institutional investors followed his lead, hoping to garner the stellar returns he achieved. But while Swensen is a gifted investor and a clear writer, his methods were not easily learned. Any pension-fund manager can invest in private equity and hedge funds, but few can do it with the success Swensen achieved. Most lost their shirts.
Like a cancer, hedge funds spread to other investors. "Funds of hedge funds" enabled almost anyone, regardless of net worth, to gain exposure to hedge funds.
What were they buying? Few hedge-fund investors knew. Several factors distinguish hedge funds from ordinary mutual funds. First, they're almost completely unregulated. Disclosure is sketchy, at best. Second, they often employ exotic and high-risk strategies. They may, for instance, speculate in currencies or commodities, or execute complex options strategies. Third, they often employ leverage.
And then there are fees. Hedge-fund managers are paid unconscionable sums of money. While the typical mutual fund may charge annual expenses of 1% -- which generates a fortune for a fund of any size -- hedge funds cost much more. They typically charge "two and twenty"--that is, 2% annually of the assets under management, plus 20% of any profits. (Of course, they don't share in a hedge fund's losses.)
I talk to mutual fund managers all the time. Three good years' worth of returns running a hedge fund, many say, and you'd have enough money to buy anything you wanted for the rest of your life. You'd have tens of millions of dollars -- at least.
No wonder managers with good records flocked to hedge funds -- and investment bankers, brokerages and others devoted major efforts to marketing them. The few truly talented hedge-fund managers were vastly outnumbered by the marginally qualified and the incompetent. By last summer, some $2.8 trillion was invested in hedge funds, according to the best estimates. Because they are so lightly regulated, no one really knows how much is invested in them.
Nor does anyone truly know how hedge funds are investing or what their returns have been. There's no question, however, that performance has been dismal. A Morningstar hedge-fund index reports average returns of -13% for the year through September 30 -- before the stock market really collapsed.
As their own businesses fell apart, investment bankers and brokerages called in loans to many hedge funds. When stocks plunged, hedge funds got more and more margin calls, forcing them to sell more and more stocks -- setting off a vicious cycle.
How much of October and early November's market breakdown had to do with forced selling by hedge funds? We'll never know precisely, but my guess is that it was a major contributor. As the market decline became more intense, correlations between different kinds of investments increased markedly. Thus, hedge funds that invest in commodities or real estate suffered as badly as did hedge funds that invest in stocks. Everything went down -- and forced selling by hedge funds fueled the conflagration.
What of the future? Many hedge funds have already folded, and more will follow. I, personally, see no reason for the industry to continue to exist. Alan Greenspan argued years ago that hedge funds would bring more liquidity to the markets -- that is, make it easier to buy and sell securities without disturbing their prices. In fact, they did exactly the opposite. They brought record volatility and helped spark a market implosion that imperils our financial system and our economy.
Steven T. Goldberg (bio) is an investment adviser and freelance writer.
Topics:
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy



Reader Comments (9)
Posted by: Bookdiva at 11/14/2008 09:19:44 AM
Doesn't anyone realize that the professionals wouldn't do these things if individual investors weren't always clamoring for higher return. Just as employers wouldn't outsource jobs and cut benefits if individual investors weren't pressuring them for higher dividends. Individuals wait too long to save and then want huge returns to build a retirement nest egg in a decade or two. Individuals spend more than they make and opt for a mortgage that they know they can't pay. (Do you really thing that all the mortgage brokers and realtors out there failed to explain what percentage or your income you should spend on a home?) Individuals push employers for higher wages, guaranteed life-time employment and fabulous pensions, until the cost of wages and benefits to fabricated a car, by high school graduates, is so prohibitive that the car makers are now reeling. Individuals use their insurance benefits like they are a bottomless pit of funds. Individuals indulge in bad health behavior like drinking, smoking sedentary lifestyles and overeating to the point of obesity so that the health system and insurance are taxed past the bursting point. We need to stop pointing fingers and all do our best to behave more responsibly. We need to stop asking for bailouts and allow the system to self-correct. Yes, some people will pay the price for their actions, but is that not what being a responsible adult is about? With the entire country having access to the internet (all the public libraries have internet access) I just don't believe it when all these people say they were duped into mortgages they couldn't afford and debt they couldn't handle. We need to stop searching for the next whipping boy and pay the piper.
Posted by: MrDeeds at 11/14/2008 11:19:08 AM
Hedge funds need regulation and the same degree of transparency as mutual funds. Large investors (presumably those for whom hedge funds were created) are free to execute any strategies in private, individually. But when assets are combined a thousand-fold, they provide the same impact on financial markets as a batch of C-4 versus a firecracker. The public interest requires reasonable monitoring of this activity.
Posted by: SteveTheHawk at 11/14/2008 11:31:06 AM
Bookdiva: The reason they are called "professionals" is because they are supposed to know what they are doing. Also, since they are investing other people's money, they should be held to a higher standard than Joe Schmoe investor who often has no clue. Your rant on all the things you view as wrong with the world aside, you can't hold individual investors responsible for much as it pertains to this market meltdown. It was the professionals that brought us to this. The banks/lenders ("professionals") that gave out 10 times the number of mortgages that they should have. The investment houses, mutual funds and hedge funds that went WAY beyond any level of reasonableness when it comes to leverage. Why did all these "professionals" do this? It's called GREED! They wanted to fatten their accounts to increase their commissions and fees, pure and simple. They clearly should have known better. I'll grant you that we are surrounded by morons that signed for mortgages that had no basis in reality. But those, for the most part, are people that often aren't well equipped to analyze this type of transaction. A much better question would be, "Why would any lender have given them the loans?". Again, the answer is greed. Now of course, the lenders are groveling for money from the public trough. Either that or they were mortgage brokers that wrote the paper, sold it, took their cut, and have now left town, leaving others to hold the bag. All of the "professionals". Yes, those losing their homes due to idiotic mortgages should have been more prudent, but the plain fact is that they never should have been granted the mortgage in the first place.
Posted by: Madaboutbailout at 11/14/2008 12:18:02 PM
I couldn't agree more with Bookdiva, we have gotten ourselves into this mess and we have to figure out a way out it. The problem is mankind will always be out for himself and so, greed will always rule the day. Make no mistake, mankind will eventually destroy mankind because of this undesireable trait.
Posted by: Fletch at 11/14/2008 06:14:17 PM
Bookdiva - WHAT? Employers don't outsource to pay dividends - they outsource to give better profits and bank higher bonuses. Individual investors are mostly people who don't know how to invest, let alone demand a particular rate of return. Professionals wanted the field to themselves - no regulators, no 'dumb' money to show them up and fees plus percentage. And yes, absolutley brokers and realtors told people that they could get into homes without worrying about the rates 4 years down the road and that refinancing would take care of future problems. What does internet access have to do with a mortgage? Have you ever tried to buy property? It's all done on paper, not the internet. The DOW has been oversold for years - stock prices have been pushed to the max and it was the result of professionals, not individuals. The health system is broken because of the amount of money they spend on everything besides paying for people's health care - ever seen the bonuses, payroll, advertising budget, printing costs, travel expenses and other budget items on a health insurance company? It's outrageous. You need to graduate and get into the real world to figure out how the money works, individually and corporately. In the meantime, as a self-insured, self employed, individual investor paying capital gains taxes this year, I need to figure out how my clients are going to survive after paying their health insurance for years and having been fired from their jobs before being vested in the non-pension defined benefit retirement plan that lost over half of it's value. Good thing I never trusted someone else to manage my money - I don't need to look for a whipping boy.
Posted by: Deano at 11/15/2008 09:03:36 AM
I just read the comment by Bookdiva. Isn't common sense refreshing? Why can't the elected officials in Washington see the light? They continue to bumble around trying to force the square peg in the round hole. Everything they have done so far has only complicated the problem lengthend the correction time and funneled tons of money into the hands of the people that should be punished for what they have done. We must assume a lot of the blame. If we were not as a whole so greedy, lazy, ignorant and selfish this cound be a pretty nice world. Maybe we could all change a little?
Posted by: wayakin at 11/15/2008 03:56:14 PM
The post by Bookdiva is exactly what I have felt but could not articulate to that extent. It is only in the last generation that the notion of a life of luxury, without equal output in terms of education or plain hard work, seems to be so widespread that it has become expected. To not understand that you should not buy a house you cannot afford, buy luxuries that are out of all context and believe it should be a given, have put us as a nation at risk. It probably is time for an moral accounting and realize our place on this planet. To claim ignorance is not an excuse.
Posted by: mike bauer at 11/15/2008 10:01:05 PM
so i guess the professionals dont have a problem with greed just the high school grads i like some of your points but tring to make fund managers victims of anything to do with the market is laughable
Posted by: Frosty at 11/20/2008 02:56:16 AM
So investors shouldn't be "always clamoring for higher return" or "pressuring them (the companies they're invested in) for higher dividends"? Wow. Sounds like they're merely pursuing their own best interests, a basic tenet of capitalism (apologies to Karl Marx). Perhaps we'll one day be able to depend on an All-Powerful State to place a 'reasonable' cap on our gains.