Rakesh Kochhar, associate director of research at the Pew Hispanic Center, has over 15 years of research experience in the areas of labor economics and price and wage measurement. Prior to joining Pew, he was senior economist at Joel Popkin and Co., where he served as a consultant to government agencies, private firms, international agencies and labor unions. He is a past president of the Society of Government EconomistsEmployers who frequently have trouble filling jobs often marvel at the claims made in union halls, on the floors of the House and Senate and on TV shoutfests that the tide of legal and illegal immigration is costing workers born in the United States their jobs. Now their skepticism is backed up by evidence.
In a study that challenges common perceptions and could ultimately influence the writing of new immigration laws, the Pew Hispanic Center finds little or no relationship between employment prospects for American-born workers and an increase in immigrant workers. Rakesh Kochhar, the study's author, studies census employment data spanning both boom and bust years between 1990 and 2004. "No consistent pattern emerges to show that native-born workers suffered or benefited from increased numbers of foreign-born workers," he writes.
As an example, Kochhar points out that while eight states with above-average growth in foreign-born workers saw a negative impact on employment rates for native-born workers, 14 states that experienced surges in immigrant workers had better-than-average employment rates for workers born in the U.S.
POSTED BY: tm (March 28, 2007 03:51 PM)
I worked in a sign company/factory in DC for quite sometime. When I worked there most of the workers were white and americans, but after 2 years or so, they started to be replaced by latinos. I asked my boss, who is white, how he feels about this situation. he said, "it is perfectly fine!" why? before those latino workers replaced the americans, the americans did nothing but complain, take a bathroom break for 1 hour, do a lousy job, quit within 3 weeks. ... so no wonder why my boss wouldnt argue about hiring latinos.
In my opinion this problem will not be solved without a realistic solution. there's no way to deport 11 mil illegals and theres hardly a way to satisfy the cry of americans who say, "they took our jobs!(south park episode, lol)." IF we can make a realistic bill that would satisfy 50/50 of these parties, i think that's as much as our law can do.
POSTED BY: jgo (March 29, 2007 12:21 AM)
Well, the author is correct. No conclusion -- one way or the other -- can be reached from the coarse data, coarsely analyzed. The margins need to be more closely examined on a field by field basis (construction, software product development, programming services, farm-hands, bio-engineers, doctors, nurses...) and looking at more age ranges and skill ranges. Pay attention to those other studies. I suspect that a longitudinal study of just a few thousand people or families, and running from 1945 or 1960 to 2006, would have been more revealing.
POSTED BY: David (January 29, 2008 09:15 PM)
There's an interesting discussion at Google Answers on what it means to have 'difficulty' hiring US workers, and the role of immigrant labor:
answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=771850
I think it will be of interest to the readers here.