Give a Gift

Will Clinton-Obama Be the Ticket in 2008?

They're archrivals for the Democratic nomination now -- but they could end up on the same team.

By Richard Sammon, Senior Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

August 14, 2007
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Advertisement

The possibility of a Clinton-Obama presidential ticket is growing. Yes, it is still early and much can and will change in this marathon presidential campaign. But Democratic Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois are way ahead of the pack and showing sustained strength. Unless one of them stumbles unexpectedly, it will be a two-person race. And Clinton leads by 20 percentage points or more in many polls, a lead that will prove hard for Obama to overtake.

If Clinton gets the nod, she may well ask Obama to be her vice presidential nominee, making the 2008 election historic -- with the first woman at the head of a major party ticket and the first African-American candidate for vice president.

Obama would probably agree. The barbs the two are trading now, as the campaign heats up, won't have a long-lasting effect on their relations. And at 46, Obama has plenty of time for a future bid. Being vice president would only help win over voters who aren't sure he has enough experience for the top job.

The matchup would have big advantages: Obama's fund-raising, for starters. He's already outpacing everyone, especially with his legions of small-dollar donors who can be tapped again in a general election campaign. Clinton and Obama could raise far more together than any immediate GOP ticket could hope to.

Plus Obama could increase Democratic turnout. Barely known only three years ago, he's now seen as an agent of change on the national stage, and he can excite the base in ways Clinton and others can't. That could help in states with big cities that have large minority populations, such as Ohio, Florida and Louisiana. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts failed to win these states in 2004, sealing his defeat.

But pairing a woman and a black man poses challenges. It may be too much for more-conservative Democrats and independents who might feel more comfortable voting for a moderate centrist Republican ticket. Winning any state in the South, save perhaps Florida, would be tough. There's another risk, too: Having two senators on the same ticket may not sell well. It hasn't worked since 1960 when John F. Kennedy tapped Lyndon Johnson as his running mate. Four of the last five presidents were governors.

If the Clinton-Obama teaming appears too fraught with risk, Clinton may opt instead for a governor, such as New Mexico's Bill Richardson or former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner. Such a move would allow her to argue the ticket has much-needed executive experience.

And what if Obama manages to win the presidential nomination? Would Hillary Clinton be his running mate? Not a chance. After eight years as first lady, she's not about to play second fiddle again.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (16)

Posted by: Richard Sammon at 08/14/2007 02:48:30 PM

There are several scenarios for a Democratic ticket. What do some of you think it will end up being? How about the likely Republican ticket? -- Richard Sammon, Kiplinger.

Posted by: Jeff Tuttle at 08/14/2007 03:16:42 PM

Well, we can only hope. Hillary had the experience and Barack has the charisma. Come on guys lets shake it up OK?

Posted by: a at 08/14/2007 03:19:00 PM

Clinton is a sellout that Rupert Murdoch the neo-conservative that owns Fox news has held fundraising events for. I don't see it happening.

Posted by: Greg L at 08/14/2007 03:35:47 PM

I would not vote for a ticket with Clinton on it.

Posted by: Mark in Burlington at 08/14/2007 06:02:59 PM

It is doubtful that Hillary would want Obama, or she would not have resorted to name-calling in her desperate attempt to end his chances. Nor would he likely agree to be her VP. Obama certainly would not want Hillary to turn off the many independent and GOP voters who are drawn to him. Unless he messes up his own candidacy, which he is fully capable of, I see Richardson as the most likely running mate for both front-runners. He adds legitimate executive and diplomatic clout to the ticket, as well as geographic and demographic diversity.

Posted by: Howard Hsu at 08/14/2007 06:47:26 PM

people have been buzzing about a Clinton/Obama ticket since 2004... why are people acting like it's such a big news development now? aside from ignorance? oh, that's the only reason? someone should mention as an aside that Joe Biden has more experience than both Hillary and Obama combined and would be better at finessing the political system and getting moderate republicans to play ball... otherwise they'll vote against Hillary or Obama any chance they can get just out of principle.

Posted by: Ann Rice at 08/15/2007 09:41:35 AM

Obama-yes. Hillary-When H--- freezes over. I have no problem with the Black + female thing.. I kind of like opening both of those doors at the same time. I just can't stomach Hillary.

Posted by: Chuck Watson at 08/15/2007 04:41:52 PM

They are both more likely to listen to the views of people with experience and skill in diplomacy than anyone in the current administration. Between them we might find a way out of the dreadful mess Bush has created.

Posted by: TMM at 08/16/2007 11:49:38 AM

The more likely winning ticket will be Clinton and Edwards. This allows those who hesitate about change to still see a traditional white male on the campaign trail.

Posted by: Edward H. Ward at 08/17/2007 04:53:01 PM

A more inept group, I cannot imagine. A president who cannot keep up with her case files and estranged from her husband and a vice president barely weaned who can't keep his mouth shut.

Posted by: madmilker60 at 08/20/2007 08:20:51 AM

dang! what happen to common sense? Money buys the media and the media pumps out the propagandist crap all the while the American voter is to lazy to think for them self........think "NEW"!

Posted by: chanell blue at 08/30/2007 08:49:59 AM

I don't think the U.S. is ready for change, such as a black man being president or a woman. I'm mostly concerned for Obama's safety.

Posted by: MJ at 08/30/2007 01:02:44 PM

The thought of a woman president... definitely something I thought I'd never see in my life time. Putting Obama on her ticket would definitely ruin any chance of becoming president in my opinion. ESPECIALLY him.

Posted by: Tom at 08/30/2007 03:25:00 PM

As Americans we should always be ready for change as it is the only thing that is constant. Female or African-American president. Choose the best candidate to take su to the next frontier! I would like to see even more variety.

Posted by: Chuck Pulfrey at 08/30/2007 05:02:53 PM

I think this would be the winning team, and I believe this country is ready for a change.

Posted by: Mike Robbins at 08/30/2007 05:23:58 PM

Ok all, I think it's time for a history leason. Clinton and Obama are not the first woman and black man combination. Fredrick Douglas ran for Vice-President under a woman, whose name escapes me right now. This has been a long time coming. Senator Clinton has already done a great job of running this country once, granted she had Mr. Clinton to filter some of it out. Swing for the fences Hillary, it is time



Featured Videos From Kiplinger





Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

facebook
RSS