PRINT
EMAIL
COMMENT
DEL.ICIO.US
DIGG
OUR PREMIUM CONTENT
The Kiplinger Agriculture Letter
The Kiplinger California Letter
Kiplinger's Biofuels Market Alert
Kiplinger's Retirement Report
SUBSCRIBER HELP
CURRENT LETTER
Stock Market Panic:
What Happens Next?
PREVIOUS ISSUES
Folks who move into their second homes and later sell won't get as big a tax break as they may be expecting, thanks to legislation that Congress will pass this fall. A provision in a pending mortgage relief bill blocks homeowners from excluding all of their gain on a second home, even if the home is sold more than two years after it becomes their primary residence.
Here's how the change will work: Currently, you can sell your primary residence and exclude up to $500,000 of gain ($250,000 for singles) if you lived there for two out of the past five years. Then you can move into your second home -- either a vacation property or a home that you've been renting out -- and, if you make it your main home for two years, use the $500,000 exclusion again when you sell it. A House-passed bill would change this by taxing some of the profit on that second home. The amount taxed would be based on the portion of the time during which the taxpayer owned the home that the house was used as a vacation home or rented out. The rest of the gain remains eligible for the up-to-$500,000 exclusion, as long as the two-out-of-five-year usage and ownership tests are met.
The good news: There is some transitional relief. The tightening will apply only to sales after 2007. Plus any periods of personal or rental use before 2008 are ignored for purposes of the provision.
For example, say a couple buys a second home in 2006 to use as their vacation home. Three years later, in 2009, they sell their primary residence and move into the vacation home, making it their main home. They sell that home in 2011, realizing a gain of $200,000. Under the proposal, 20% of the gain, or $40,000 (one year of nonqualified use after 2007 divided by five years of ownership), isn't eligible for the capital gains exclusion. The other $160,000 can be excluded from income because the two-year usage and ownership tests were met.
The mortgage relief bill containing this loophole closer is designed to help homeowners caught by the downturn in the subprime mortgage market: Under current law, if your lender forgives a portion of unpaid mortgage debt, you must pay income tax on the forgiven amount to the extent that it exceeds the value of your home, except to the extent you are insolvent. The pending bill would let homeowners exclude those amounts from income. The measure also extends through 2014 the tax deduction for private mortgage insurance, which is scheduled to expire at the end of this year. The loophole closer was added to offset revenue losses from the relief provisions. Because the real estate industry doesn't oppose this tax change, it's a sure bet to pass the Senate and be enacted before Congress adjourns for the year.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
POSTED BY: Joan O\'Neil (October 20, 2007 10:43 AM)
I think senior citizens should be entitled to stop paying SS and taxes after the age of 70. We can barely make ends meet much less having to pay out so much for taxes and etc.
POSTED BY: Roger Westland (March 10, 2008 11:19 AM)
Joan Pryde commented on provisions of HR 3648 that prorates the $500,000 exclusion when converting a second home to a primary residence. The bill was signed into law 12-20-07. Was this provision removed from the law? Roger Westland
POSTED BY: Joan Pryde (March 11, 2008 02:30 PM)
Mr. Westland is correct. Although Congress did approve the mortgage relief bill, a number of provisions were removed from it, including the one that would have hit taxpayers who converted a second home into a primary residence and then sold it. Since this provision is a revenue raiser, we think we haven't seen the last of it, and it may pop up in a future tax bill.
E-Mail Article
Print Article
Reprint Article
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
