PRINT
EMAIL
COMMENT
BUZZ UP
DIGGEXECUTIVE POLL
Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?
OUR PREMIUM CONTENT
The Kiplinger Agriculture Letter
The Kiplinger California Letter
Kiplinger's Biofuels Market Alert
Kiplinger's Retirement Report
SUBSCRIBER HELP
CURRENT LETTER
Overhauling
Financial Regs
PREVIOUS ISSUES
Don't stand by while health care costs keep rising -- an estimated 8% this year and next for most companies, about three times the cost of inflation. Employers and workers are finding that an aggressive, proactive approach can limit annual increases to about 2.5%.
What can you do? There's no magic bullet, no single step or trick that will work right away for all employers or workers. But a series of small, incremental steps can make a big difference, according to a recent survey by Watson Wyatt Worldwide of businesses that have limited cost increases in recent years.
Keep these basic principles in mind:
- Prevention is crucial. Be aggressive in persuading employees to get regular checkups and enroll in disease management programs. Getting workers to care for their illnesses will lower the odds of expensive complications later on.
- Give wage earners a stake in lowering costs. Financial incentives are a smart investment if they reduce the number of costly illnesses.
- Pay attention to those most at risk, such as employees who smoke, are overweight or who have chronic problems, such as diabetes or heart conditions.
More specifically, many companies are finding that it pays to provide free prevention services, such as flu shots and mammograms. Some also cover the entire cost of drugs for low-income employees with chronic illnesses so they're more likely to take medicines that can control their disease. Marriott International pays for many generic drugs and cuts the cost of many brand-name medicines in half.
Other businesses reward pregnant women for joining prenatal nutrition programs. A premature birth with complications can cost a firm millions of dollars. Fiserv Inc. offers savings bonds to women who go for regular checkups and attend classes, with a big gift certificate when the baby is born.
Also popular are plans that offer incentives for weight-loss, fitness and stop-smoking regimens. IBM, for example, pays up to $300 a year to participants. Employers should be careful, though, to reward all workers for healthy lifestyles. Otherwise, they could inadvertently create morale problems and prompt complaints of unfair treatment.
The key to all efforts is making sure workers have the tools they need, including access to information. Provide specific data on the quality and cost of doctors in your area so employees can be smart consumers. Internet-based systems let them compare the prices and success rates of specific health care providers.
Another option is to charge for spousal coverage if the spouse works and is eligible for other insurance. A typical surcharge is $100 a month.
Health Savings Accounts are also effective in cutting costs. They're tax deductible when combined with a high-deductible insurance policy.
Most of these ideas will work for all businesses, but big firms have additional options. Some provide on-site clinics to make preventive care convenient, and many mine claims data for trends on illnesses. The data can help determine which disease management plans are needed.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
POSTED BY: Not Ron (April 05, 2007 11:01 AM)
To Ron: Tripe? You obviously don't get the point of the article: employees should DO something about their health problems. Plus, this article is specifcally about people WITH jobs, so obviously those without jobs would be covered by public health care.
POSTED BY: Cornflakes (April 06, 2007 03:04 PM)
It's just more of the same "push health care cost on the employee", rather then fix the broken system.
NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE is the solution!
I don't know any employees in my company (over 300,000 of them) who aren't doing as much as they can about their various health problems. It's the cost of trying to do something that is difficult. Don't even get me started.
POSTED BY: koko (April 27, 2007 02:15 PM)
The pros/cons of this debate have led to another national epidemic; it's called inertia. Business mgs/leaders know that WORKPLACE STRESS is the biggest reason for missed work days/illness. The workforce has paid a steep personal price for fueling spectacular job productivity in this country. Now, workers are challenged to give in yet another way. When will corporate America wake up? For example, providing on-site fitness programs can work only when employees can use them without being penalized for--you guessed it--taking time away from their jobs. Same with flex time: companies are reluctant to offer this benefit, which has been proven to decrease stress, increase productivity, and lessen traffic congestion (less peak-hour commuters). Another side benefit of flex time is reduction in green-house gasses...
E-Mail Article
Print Article
Reprint Article
