Mortgages: How Long Till Daylight?
A long time -- certainly not before the end of 2008. And borrowers shouldn't expect easier mortgage terms until 2009.
By Jerome Idaszak, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter
November 19, 2007
Advertisement
The subprime mortgage crisis is going to take most of 2008 to clear up. Hardly a day goes by without a major lender announcing a multibillion-dollar write-down on the value of mortgages and mortgage-backed securities in its possession. The cascade of bad news spells big trouble for banks' earnings in coming quarters as well as a continuing drag on the stock market and the economy in general.
In the meantime, a huge chunk of the mortgage market -- namely, subprime and other higher-risk loans -- will be frozen, sapping demand for housing and imposing continued downward pressure on the pace of construction and sales. The risky loan category rose from only 7% of outstanding mortgage debt in 2000 to almost 25% this year.
Up to one in five risky mortgages may well go into foreclosure, meaning that these loan defaults would total about 5% of the entire mortgage market. That may not seem like a huge proportion, but it's enough to give investors and banks the jitters. Note that the total value of these defaults would be $450 billion. Investors in mortgage-backed securities stand to lose a whopping $225 billion or so, since they'd make back some cash by selling foreclosed properties.
Odds are that mortgage lenders won't start loosening up loan terms until 2009. They've got plenty to deal with until then. Banks are holding, not dumping, their mortgage-backed debt. Diane Swonk, chief economist with Mesirow Financial, says, "Some of the asset-backed securities are good, but no one knows which ones."
Given that unknown, there's no fire sale going on now. However, banks are substantially marking down the value that they expect to derive from such mortgages in the future. Some financial vultures are circling, offering the lenders 50¢ or even less on the dollar for the mortgages. But the lenders think they can get more for their assets once the subprime dust settles. After all, most of the loans considered untouchable now will actually continue to generate income. Banks figure that market hysteria will pass in a year or so, allowing sellers of mortgage-backed securities to extract more value from their sale.
In fact, most risky mortgages aren't held by the banks that originated them. The loans were securitized and sold in bundles to Wall Street investment firms, which in turn resold them to investors such as pension funds in the U.S. and foreign banks around the world. The now-infamous structured investment vehicles set up by Citigroup and others did much of the dealmaking in mortgage securities.
There are still mortgages being made and sold as securities, but their volume can't fill the void caused by the drying up of subprime loans. There are mortgages for customers with solid credit histories. Standards have been tightened, though, which further reduces the pool of buyers. Note, however, that loan requirements are tightening up from extremely lax levels during the boom years. As housing consultant Thomas Lawler says, "Lending levels were ludicrous from 2003 through 2006."
Now it's more typical for banks to require at least a 10% down payment and to not offer home buyers the option of a piggyback home equity loan to finance part of the purchase. Given the combination of fewer subprime loans and tighter standards for creditworthy customers, the tally of unsold homes in the U.S. is about 1 million, double the amount at the end of 2005.
Interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve will provide some help. The cuts will lower rates on adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) by three-fourths of one percentage point, easing the blow of higher interest rate resets for some homeowners. All told, about $1 trillion worth of ARMs will reset during 2008. How many of those homeowners choose to walk away from their houses or go into default will affect the price of securities held by Wall Street firms and other investors. Meanwhile, the supply of unsold new and existing homes will continue to rise.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


Reader Comments (5)
Posted by: Joe Honick at 11/20/2007 09:49:10 AM
Many of us warned about this several years ago, as "exotic" mortgages were being doled out to millions who were never going to be able to pay when the rates became adjusted way upward. The wonder is that many who posed as the keenest analysts of such things failed to take note of those warnings and now bring the sad news of the results.
Posted by: Peter Goldstein at 11/20/2007 03:07:47 PM
Mr. Honick: Hi. Peter Goldstein, economics editor for Kiplinger here. I just wanted to reply to your comments about why no one seemed to see this coming. In all fairness, lots of people - including us - warned that there would be fallout from subprime lending and other exotic mortgage lending. However, it was clear to absolutely no one until fairly recently just how widespread this type of lending was and the extent to which the investment community neglected to properly weigh its risks. In fact, those predicting serious fallout from exotic mortgages early on were focused almost exclusively on the demand-side impact - that is, what impact it would have on consumer demand. The logic went that the decline in spending by squeezed households would lead to a recession. Ironically, consumers have actually held up surprisingly well--even better than Kiplinger expected! And in the event, the fallout from the mortgage mess has mainly come from the opposite direction, that is, the supply-side or financial sector side. If anyone had predicted the way this actually happened, I'd be interested in reading about it. Thanks for your input.
Posted by: Darren Meade at 11/20/2007 03:17:01 PM
My heart goes out to the many borrowers and their families who are going through this reset period on "exotic' mortgages. However, in general in my opinion this is not an issue of borrowers making poor decisions. Nor of brokers taking advantage of borrowers (again in general, as there will always be exceptions) The reality is that the Senior Level Executives of companies such as New Century, Freemont Investment etc., who continually grew earnings by offering higher returns on mortgage backed securities are the true criminals, as well as the investment banks who continued to rate them as 'Good Buys' up until the day they sought BK protection or were shut down by the FDIC. They profited from options and their personal stock. Once these large players filed for protection, it had a domino effect taking out all the smaller lenders and also made the street no longer wishing to purchase this paper. While it may be standard practice (which I personally believe to unethical) in the corporate world to file for protection and not pay vendors, the leadership of these firms have caused many to lose their homes, families and cause maritial strife. It is my opinion that this is no different than the savings and loan scandals and we need to bring up on charges the executive leadership of these past firms, and also the analysts. This is not the borrowers fault that everything within the industry went upside down and all the rules changed. I believe within New Century and others they must have had a statiscal model available to predict their possible default rates. Further I believe any analyst whose job was to watch these firms must have thought when they delayed releasing earnings that something negative might be happening, yet they continued to advise people to invest. We know the news media's job is to peddle fear, but lets look at the reality of matters. Thank You Kiplinger's for doing just that. Best Regards,
Posted by: David B at 11/21/2007 08:44:15 AM
I rent out middle income homes in the Detroit suburbs. I have noticed a huge increase in calls from people who have had good credit but have decided to walk away from their homes because of rising mortgage payments and a huge decrease in the value of their houses. While this is going on in my city, every time I go to my bank and make a deposit, I am being solicited for a second mortgage offer from the bank teller. What is wrong with this picture.... The financial institutions are in for a world of hurt until they reinvent themselves and find a way to focus on healthy loan opportunities instead of picking the last bits and pieces of home equity value from vulnerable home owners. It might be time to firm up lending practices in the consumer market. The question is if our economy can survive such a huge credit shift. Ha! Maybe we can start AFTER the Christmas holidays. David B
Posted by: Ken at 11/22/2007 12:23:38 PM
With billions of dollars being spent the the sand pit of Iraq and the continuous borrowing for money by this government from china and others, can we possibly expect anything but what a mess we now find ourselves in? Until the American people wake up and find out there is no such thing as a "free lunch" inflation and the dropping of the dollar will continue. Since there is no possible chance that this generation will realize that free lunch isn't free, property values will skyrocket after this crisis passes and gold will always hold its value. I would be that the well heeled buyers will be out in force this time next year in anticipation of the next real estate value increase.